Posted on 07/17/2016 5:13:04 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
The 28-page section of the 9/11 report detailing Saudi involvement in the September 11, 2001 jihad attacks have finally been released (albeit with substantial portions still redacted), and it is now clear why one President who held hands with the Saudi King and another who bowed to him worked so hard all these years to keep these pages secret: they confirm that the 9/11 jihad murderers received significant help from people at the highest levels of the Saudi government.
The report states that Omar al-Bayoumi, who may be a Saudi intelligence officer, gave substantial assistance to hijackers Khalid al-Mindhar and Nawaf al-Hamzi after they arrived in San Diego in February 2000. Al-Bayoumi met the hijackers at a public place shortly after his meeting with an individual at the Saudi consulate. Around the same time, al-Bayoumi had extensive contact with Saudi Government establishments in the United States and received financial support from a Saudi company affiliated with the Saudi Ministry of Defense. That company reportedly had ties to Usama bin Ladin and al-Qaida.
Another possible Saudi agent, Osama Bassnan, who has many ties to the Saudi government and was also a supporter of Osama bin Laden, boasted that he did more for al-Mindhar and al-Hamzi than al-Bayoumi did. He also reportedly received funding and possibly a fake passport from Saudi government officials. The report says that at one point, a member of the Saudi Royal Family provided Bassnan with a significant amount of cash, and that he and his wife have received financial support from the Saudi ambassador to the United States and his wife. That ambassador was Prince Bandar, about whom the New York Times later noted: No foreign diplomat has been closer or had more access to President Bush, his family and his administration than the magnetic and fabulously wealthy Prince Bandar bin Sultan of Saudi Arabia.
Then there was Shaykh al-Thumairy, an accredited diplomat at the Saudi consulate in Los Angeles and one of the imams at the King Fahad mosque in Culver City, California, who also may have been in contact with al-Mindhar and al-Hamzi.
Saleh al-Hussayen, reportedly a Saudi Interior Ministry official, stayed at the same hotel in Herndon, Virginia where al-Hazmi was staying. While al-Hussayen claimed after September 11 not to know the hijackers, FBI agents believed he was being deceptive. He was able to depart the United States despite FBI efforts to locate and re-interview him. Who got him out of the country?
There is much more. The report redacts the name of another Saudi national with close ties to the Saudi Royal Family, but notes that he is the subject of FBI counterterrorism investigations and reportedly was checking security at the United States southwest border in 1999 and discussing the possibility of infiltrating individuals into the United States. There is no telling who this could have been, but Prince Bandars unlisted phone number turned up in a phone book of Abu Zubaida, a senior al-Qaida operative captured in Pakistan in March 2002. Abu Zubaida also had the number of a bodyguard at the Saudi Embassy in Washington, DC.
The report also mentions a CIA memorandum that discusses alleged financial connections between the September 11 hijackers, Saudi Government officials, and members of the Saudi Royal Family. This memorandum was passed on to an FBI investigator; yet despite the clear national implications of the CIA memorandum, the FBI agent included the memorandum in an individual case file and did not forward it to FBI Headquarters. Why?
There is still more, and with this much smoke, there is almost certainly fire: the Saudi connection to 9/11 goes to the highest levels of the Saudi government. And as I detail in my new book The Complete Infidels Guide to Iran, a U.S. District Judge ruled in 2011 that the Islamic Republic of Iran was liable for damages to 9/11 families because of Irans role in facilitating the 9/11 attacks. The judge found that Iran and its proxy Hizballah had cooperated and collaborated with al-Qaeda before 9/11 in planning the attacks, and continued that cooperation after the attacks.
After 9/11, the U.S. declared war on terror and entered Iraq and Afghanistan. But if Bush had really been serious about attacking jihad terror at its root, he would have invaded Saudi Arabia and Iran instead. Under Obama, the betrayal has gotten exponentially worse. There needs to be a full Congressional investigation now into why these 28 pages were kept secret for so long, with those responsible punished accordingly. And above all, the next American administration must make a searching reevaluation of our relationship with Saudi Arabia, and stop treating enemies as allies.
I remember reading something about how the Bush family actually allowed the departure of the Bin Laden Family from the US very shortly after 9-11, like within a couple of days.
So I did a quick search, a came up with these results:
Bin Laden Family Members Evacuated from US in Wake of the 9 ...
Bin Laden Family Members Evacuated from US ... “the Bush administration allowed a jet to fly ... it could be argued that having these two men fly out ...
Search domain www.globalresearch.caglobalresearch.ca/bin-laden-family-members-evacuated-from-u...More results
Bin Laden Ties - TvNewsLIES.org
Bin Laden family fled United States - Two dozen members ... Bush, the bin Ladens are not the ... were permitted to fly into, out of, or within the United States ...
Search domain www.tvnewslies.orgtvnewslies.org/html/bin_laden_ties.html
Bin Laden Family ‘Evacuated’ From US - Sky News
Bin Laden Family ‘Evacuated’ From US. 10:11, ... Share by email; Members of Osama bin Laden’s family were allowed to fly out of ... but sources told Vanity Fair the ...
Search domain news.sky.comnews.sky.com/story/209876/bin-laden-family-evacuated-f...
The Secret Saudi Flight on 9-13 Could be the Key to the Bush ...
The Secret Saudi Flight on 9-13 Could be the Key to the Bush-Saudi-Al Qaeda Connection. ... out of the United States ... Bush, James Baker, and the Bin Laden family ...
x
It’s jawdropping.
Ma and pa seem like such down home folk.
Hundreds of thousands of lives destroyed and trillions spent to basically let the muslim hordes loose, which lead to obama and the arab spring.
If the aim was to secure a base in Iraq, it failed. Obummer is responsible for a lot of trouble when he pulled all of the troops out. No doubt.
But they’re were going to be constant attacks on US Troops by suicide bombers and other nuts.
I know saddam supported terror to an extent, but he also squashed any fanatics.
He was a 2 cent dictator.
“If Saudi Arabia objects or hinder this - carpet bomb them.”
Better still, have all those fat rug riders over for dinner and have Polonium on the menu. Having the “royal family” all die a slow aggonizing death would bring us a modicum of satisfaction that justice has been done.
“President Bush. What did he know and when did he know it?”
Pi$$ on that worthless bastard. He was in the tank for the Saudi’s from day one. I rue the two times I voted for him!
“if Bush had really been serious about attacking jihad terror at its root, he would have invaded Saudi Arabia and Iran instead.”
Ya think? But think of all those petrodollars that would not have lined his family’s pockets.
American Soldiers, Airmen, Sailors, and Marines lost their lives in Iraq on Bushes orders.
TREASON IS PUNISHABLE BY DEATH.
bookmark
I wouldn't say they were "dimwits". They were criminal conspirators who belong at the end of a noose.
Bush’s fault.
No, it really IS Bush’s fault.
PING!
There are only two ways to think about this in that context. One, that Bush knew the day of the attack, because he knew before the attack - and I reject that. Two, Bush had a good idea who was behind the attack (after the attack), primarily because it bore the trademark of bin Laden (lots of people thought this at the time) and because of the intelligence that was given to him after the attack. The documents themselves state that the intelligence agencies didn't consider the Saudis as exporters of terrorism at the time of the 9-11 attack, and thus IMHO it is doubtful that Bush was given definitive intelligence at the time stating that the Saudis were complicit in the attack.
Plus, I don't think of the Saudis as a monolithic entity. I don't trust them in the slightest, but don't think that the entire family is in the business of exporting terrorism. IMHO there are factions within the Saudi family that are more problematic than others, and that the Saudi right hand and left hand don't always play in concert. I also think that the Saudis hold on power in SA is fragile, and that the US government and intelligence agencies don't know sometimes which is the worst scenario - the continuation of the nefarious state of SA, or what would replace it if the Saudi family lost control.
While I agree with the premise of your comment, we went after the wrong places, and my regiment mates died to help cover up for the Sauds.
I get that the situation is complicated in SA, but I would still like to see Medina and mecca with mushroom clouds overhead.
I’m very sorry about your regiment mates. Very, sincerely. I think too many young men and women have died while fighting (or while deployed and not allowed to fight) in a war that has not been declared, and against an enemy that our own ‘leaders’ won’t name. Frankly, too many of those in politics don’t deserve to have our sons and daughters fighting for them. I’m beyond ‘draft’ age, but it would be much more appropriate for me, and my generation, to go and fight the mess that many of us helped create by looking the other way and by voting in many people who never should have been allowed leadership roles.
“All cruelty springs from weakness.” - Seneca
Obola and Kerry let the Orlando terrorists' team LEAVE.
Meanwhile, the treasonous GOP continues as THE GiveObamaPower party.
Bush had to know this...
After the fact. Probably fairly long after the fact. The redacted pages themselves state multiple times that the CIA and FBI weren't treating the Saudis as a potential terrorist threat prior to 9-11, and could not produce definitive evidence after 9-11, so I highly doubt Bush or anyone else in the White House or Congress knew the score.
I'm not exonerating Bush from any responsibility, but I'm also totally unwilling to proclaim Bush was a traitor on the basis of some redacted pages of speculation that were
selectively released by an administration that would just love to rekindle the anti-Bush, it's all Bush's fault rhetoric just before a major US election.
What we should all keep in mind is that the Clintons have received millions from the Saudis, and the Saudis have been contributing heavily to Hillary.
The Clintons have absolutely no excuse for doing this, as the nefarious role of Saudi Arabia in global terrorism has become much more a concern in recent years, and Hillary would have had access to all things Saudi while she was SOS.
>>>>Let's not fall into the trap of letting the left provoke a response that distracts from their role.
“...What we should all keep in mind is that the Clintons have received millions from the Saudis, and the Saudis have been contributing heavily to Hillary. ...”
$audi hu$h money paid to the klintoons...
If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Related threads
Congress to release 28 redacted pages on '9/11 Saudi connection' as early as Friday
Congress releases secret '28 pages' on alleged Saudi 9/11 ties
TWO words you ONLY need to know: Sandy Burglar !!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.