How Is The Meeting Innocent If Clinton/Lynch Met On a Different Plane Than Either Had Arrived On?

Opinion | 1 Jul 16 | Xzins

[xzins]

Rush Limbaugh revealed something that no one else has mentioned.

But first off: "Amid an ongoing investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of email and hours before the public release of the Benghazi report, US Attorney General Loretta Lynch met privately with former President Bill Clinton. The private meeting took place on the west side of Sky Harbor International Airport on board a parked private plane," that was being used by Loretta Lynch and her husband. They're traveling around doing appearances on how the Justice Department's taking over local police departments.

Now, neither Clinton nor Loretta Lynch actually arrived in Phoenix on that plane. Did you know that? You didn't know that? The plane on which they met is not the plane either of them used to get there. It looks like somebody put that plane there so nobody would see the meeting. And again, as I say, if it weren't for this local ABC affiliate, for some reason had a camera crew out at Sky Harbor, we wouldn't know that this meeting had taken place. http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2016/06/30/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta

I have not heard Limbaugh back off of that factoid, but it is possible it is in error. Factual errors are possible for anyone. Limbaugh doesn't often make them.

What does it mean that Lynch arrived on one plane but switched to another for her meeting with Clinton? What does it mean that this was not the plane Clinton had used?

It seems to mean that someones were trying hard not to be detected. If just an innocent run-in with one another, why the elaborate scheme? Wouldn't it actually have made more sense to meet in the lobby of the airport, exchange French cheek insincerities, and then talk about messy grandkids? Wouldn't that have taken the need for 'deniable' out of 'plausible deniability'?

Finally, why is Rush Limbaugh the only human being on the planet on top of this angle? If it is in error, then Rush has some serious penance at his next confession to perform.

However, if he is correct, then this story has quid-pro-fingerprint all over it, and the media silence is beyond sycophantish toadyism. It goes all the way to co-conspirator. And that should make us fear for the future of the republic.

[YogicCowboy]

I think you are entirely correct.

Communists are by nature devious and duplicitous; they are never candid and innocent.

[umgud]

Yes, ditto, etc.

[dearolddad]

No reporter on the ground thought to check flight logs and tail no,s. on the planes.

[Grampa Dave]

In his new book Crisis of Character: A White House Secret, Gary Bryne tells about another secret service agent’s private encounter with the God Father, Bill Clinton, during the hearing, starting on page 166-167.

Clinton approached the agent and after some small talk, he asked the agent how his wife and kids were…...They had never actually talked before.

“Nothing about that was normal. It was obviously a subtle form of intimidation. The president was sending a message that he knew of the officer’s recent testimony,---and perhaps was sending a more sinister message.”

[hecticskeptic]

Perhaps Billy Jeff's intent was to compromise the AG so thoroughly that she feels obliged to appoint a special prosecutor.

That makes it sound like LL truly didn’t know that Billy boy was showing up until he knocked on the door of the plane. It seems to me that both sides had something to gain here…..What if they tried to get to Lynch earlier and she said “well, the absolute farthest that I would go is recuse myself but I’m not doing that on my own volition.” And the Clintoons said “no problem, how about we create the situation that lets you do that”? The thinking by the Clintons was that Billy Boy just gets to look reckless and stupid for 24 hours and then they are back in the saddle again.