Skip to comments.How Is The Meeting Innocent If Clinton/Lynch Met On a Different Plane Than Either Had Arrived On?
Posted on 07/01/2016 1:05:26 PM PDT by xzins
Rush Limbaugh revealed something that no one else has mentioned.
But first off: "Amid an ongoing investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of email and hours before the public release of the Benghazi report, US Attorney General Loretta Lynch met privately with former President Bill Clinton. The private meeting took place on the west side of Sky Harbor International Airport on board a parked private plane," that was being used by Loretta Lynch and her husband. They're traveling around doing appearances on how the Justice Department's taking over local police departments.
Now, neither Clinton nor Loretta Lynch actually arrived in Phoenix on that plane. Did you know that? You didn't know that? The plane on which they met is not the plane either of them used to get there. It looks like somebody put that plane there so nobody would see the meeting. And again, as I say, if it weren't for this local ABC affiliate, for some reason had a camera crew out at Sky Harbor, we wouldn't know that this meeting had taken place. http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2016/06/30/what_i_think_bill_told_loretta
I have not heard Limbaugh back off of that factoid, but it is possible it is in error. Factual errors are possible for anyone. Limbaugh doesn't often make them.
What does it mean that Lynch arrived on one plane but switched to another for her meeting with Clinton? What does it mean that this was not the plane Clinton had used?
It seems to mean that someones were trying hard not to be detected. If just an innocent run-in with one another, why the elaborate scheme? Wouldn't it actually have made more sense to meet in the lobby of the airport, exchange French cheek insincerities, and then talk about messy grandkids? Wouldn't that have taken the need for 'deniable' out of 'plausible deniability'?
Finally, why is Rush Limbaugh the only human being on the planet on top of this angle? If it is in error, then Rush has some serious penance at his next confession to perform.
However, if he is correct, then this story has quid-pro-fingerprint all over it, and the media silence is beyond sycophantish toadyism. It goes all the way to co-conspirator. And that should make us fear for the future of the republic.
So, with all due credit to Rush Limbaugh, how does an accidental meeting on an entirely different plane go about happening?
Saudi owned Plane ?
I heard that. But the reporter who broke the story says it was on the AG’s plane. I’d like to know where Rush got the story. The reporter was not on the ground - this is what he was told from his sources.
I haven’t heard anyone report on it other than Rush.
The media is absolutely stunning in its lack of interest in this story.
Sorry to rain on your parade, but Limbaugh is the only person to make this claim.
I wouldn’t make much out of it until someone corroborates it.
Who owned that plane? And wouldn’t the SS have to sweep hours before Clinton got on?
Bubba had the third plane checked for bugs before being rolled in to position.
Any sweets or bling for the guests on plane #3?
If there were another plane, not government owned, the possibility of a camera or other recording device is minimized................
Apparently, BJ heard she was arriving and met her plane, reportedly a federal Gulfstream. The feds in attendance ordered no pictures, etc.
Where was the Lolita Express on the day in question?
We’re talking about the third plane being devoid of surveillance equipment... But what if the third plane would be chosen because it WAS bugged ?
What does court admissible evidence look like if you bug your own plane, versus bugging a third plane ?
If you’re going to go after the DOJ then the evidence you need may in fact be different than what you would need in a normal court.
Think of trying to get evidence on someone who “owns the judge” then remember that Loretta literally OWNS the judges.
If we’re going to think that the third plane was chosen because it wasn’t bugged, then we would need to see who could deliver a plane that would be neutral or otherwise guaranteed of it ? IS this why Hillary leases Dan Bilzerian’s jet ?
Actually, I think I wrote that Limbaugh is the only one I’ve heard it from.
However, it is such a curious detail to be WRONG on. One would naturally assume either his plane or her plane.
That would be an interesting twist.
The entire event was coordinated at the highest levels. Nothing happens by chance with players at that level.
We’re only aware of this meeting because they want us to be aware of it.
Somehow, some way, this meeting will prove to be part of a delicately planned chain of events which have been engineered to protect and benefit the major players, the Democrat party, and their globalist agenda.
Plus, Clinton delayed his takeoff so he could be there when Lynch landed.
It wasn’t. Bill was given a heads up that Hellary was going to be prosecuted and told about the 27 month reprieve on the foundation. Can’t see it being unpleasant, maybe jovial.
The bent one was lookin fo some brown sugah ... Horn dog....
Don’t think for a moment that hadn’t occurred to me....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.