Breaking: Hillary Clinton Sent Information Marked Classified (Fox News report)

The Observer/Fox News ^ | 06/11/16 10:15a | By Austin Bay

[blueyon]

Not a lawyer but what about this https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071 (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 795; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, § 552(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1566; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.) NOTE: "and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States"

[Scutter]

Yep, but the rules that apply to you and I never seem to catch up with the Clintons.

[davandbar]

I guess the only question I have is:

It looks like it was marked “Classified” on 1/29/2016 but the email seems to have been sent on 4/9/2012.

Isn’t Hillary going to claim that it wasn’t “Classified” on the send date?

I thought that was the excuse she has been using all along or am I reading this incorrectly?

[Carl Vehse]

What did FBI Comey know about this and when did he know it? And now that it’s public, why hasn’t he done anything about it.

President Trump will need to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Comey and other FBI agents to see what crimes, malfeasance, misfeasance, or nonfeasance they may have committed.

[Windflier]

It convenient fiction that the Clinton’s are “husband and wife”

Yes, I know. I'm nitpicking the fact that the MSM has lately gotten into the habit of using the suffix, Ms, to label married women.

If you ask me, they're embarrassed to call any woman a 'Mrs', lest they violate the doctrine of political correctness. Oh, the horror!

[Logical me]

The fix is in. Nothing will happen to Hillary. King Obama has thrown the protection umbrella over her. And when the King speaks, the communists black Muslim terrorists, you better listen. She is free.

[HiTech RedNeck]

So is the Magic Negro that magic?

Such a structure bodes to be cumbersome, and cannot keep up with the relatively agility of Trump’s.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Versus Trump And The Angry White Men...

this will get interesting.

[HiTech RedNeck]

It’s hatred of a caricature of the idea of the husband owning the wife as property.

[HiTech RedNeck]

The fox will just have to see who it is that has raided the henhouse.

[Seven_0]

Hillary will NOT be Bill’s “Third Term” —she will be OBAMA’s.

If this take Hillary down, it would take Obama down too. Obama's conflict of interest is getting more obivious.

[9YearLurker]

Neither is “Ms.” a suffix nor does it denote an unmarried woman.

[CatOwner]

In the 30 years of working with classified information, I would have lost my job (at a minimum) for doing less than what Hillary has done. Instead, half this country supports this traitor. Sigh.

[mrsmith]

Supposedly it’s a copy of the email she received.
I don’t understand either how an email sent in 2012 could have a classification date of 2016 on it at the time!

Something is amiss.

[RockyTx]

is this story for real?

why wasn’t this spotted earlier?

[OldSmaj]

More BULLSHIT that will go NOWHERE...again.

C'mon guys...she ain't going to jail, she'll never be prosecuted.

Barky will protect her 'til the bitter end.

Let's concentrate on getting out the Trump vote...whip her considerably wrinkled old ass at the ballot box, 'cause she will be the nominee and she will be on the dimrat ballot.

Let's work on the voting against her, 'cause she will never be prosecuted, she'll never answer for her lies, Benghazi, TravelGate, CattleGate...Vince Foster, you name it...she will always walk free, let's make sure the bitch doesn't walk in the White House.

[davandbar]

Isn’t Hillary claiming that she never sent or received emails that were marked classified “at the time?” My understanding is that the State Dept. can mark something classified at any time. It just seems like this is one of those times.

Unfortunately, I don’t see any smoking gun on this one—it just looks retroactively marked classified—which fits into her convenient excuse (or am I still missing something?).

[Windflier]

“Neither is “Ms.” a suffix nor does it denote an unmarried woman.”

Sorry, I meant prefix, and yes, the term was coined in the 1970s to denote an unmarried woman who is too old to be considered a Miss.

I’m old enough to well remember the introduction of that term.

[uncbob]

C'mon guys...she ain't going to jail, she'll never be prosecuted.

Without the constant drumbeat from the MSM night after night you are correct she Skates

Sad to say but even today with the internet and Talk Radio the MSM ABC-CBS-NBC WAPO and NYT still control the issues

[PrairieDawg]

The Portion Marking was in the original email (which meant that the email was classified when sent). The 2016 marking is from where the FBI or State reviewed the email and marked it. But the portion marked with a C was classified as confidential when it was sent in 2012. Clear as mud?