Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP rep: Trump’s Muslim ban ‘unconstitutional’
The Hill ^ | June 03, 2016 | Mark Hensch

Posted on 06/03/2016 10:56:00 AM PDT by McGruff

Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) on Friday said Donald Trump’s temporary ban on Muslim travel into the U.S. would not survive Constitutional scrutiny.

“If I had to pick a particular position that would concern me the most, it would be the ban on Muslims,” Cole, a lawmaker close to GOP leadership, said Friday on MSNBC. "I think it’s clearly, you know, unconstitutional, it’s ill-advised, it would really hurt the U.S.

“We need a lot of Muslim friends to deal with what we’re dealing with overseas, and we have some great Muslim friends. And we ought to recognize that and be sensitive.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; foreigners; immigration; muslims; nationalsecurity; terror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: McGruff

would not survive Constitutional scrutiny.

What is this “Constitution” everyone speaks of?? I know way back when we had a Book of Rules for Government, but the Supreme Leader issued an executive order banning it’s use many years ago. The Supreme Leaders two Advisory Boards, the Senate and House have also been ordered to stop referring to it, in which they happily agreed to do nothing but follow the Supreme Leaders orders. I remember not too long ago the Supreme Leaders Legal Team on the Supreme Leaders Court concurred with the Supreme Leader and Banished the Book of Rules permanently. So once again, What is this “Constitution” you speak of???


41 posted on 06/03/2016 11:12:03 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
So the president has the power to restrict the admission and presence of aliens as he sees fit. No wonder the open borders crowd is terrified of Trump. Very interesting!
42 posted on 06/03/2016 11:13:25 AM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Islam is a “religion” that regularly practices human sacrifices, and yet it is accepted as a “mainstream religion”. WHY?


43 posted on 06/03/2016 11:13:53 AM PDT by r_barton (GO TRUMP!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Under U.S. Code, the president does have the statutory authority to keep anyone out of the country, for any reason he thinks best. Per 8 USC §1182

“Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”


44 posted on 06/03/2016 11:14:02 AM PDT by Carriage Hill ( "If it takes a bloodbath, let's get it over with. No more appeasement." - RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Absolutely, on both accounts.


45 posted on 06/03/2016 11:14:15 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

If begun today, tha case would not be heard for at least 18 months and then be under appeal for at least 2 years.

by that time the vetted muslims like the King of Jordan and new diplomats and businessmen and such will be admitted and those not admitted would mostly be radicals


46 posted on 06/03/2016 11:14:43 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Freedom of religion has nothing to do with regulating entry into the country by foreign nationals, who have no constitutional rights in this country until they are allowed to enter.


47 posted on 06/03/2016 11:15:02 AM PDT by Genoa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

I didn’t know the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution with some ‘mooooslem “friends”’ in mind.


48 posted on 06/03/2016 11:15:24 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (qq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

It’s only until we figure out what the hell is going on.


49 posted on 06/03/2016 11:15:53 AM PDT by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

“unconstitutional” my arse! They aren’t citizens in the first place


50 posted on 06/03/2016 11:16:25 AM PDT by gljones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

MACCARRAN WALTER ACT OF 1952


51 posted on 06/03/2016 11:17:16 AM PDT by MichaelRDanger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

I don’t recall the US letting in even POTENTIAL NAZI’s or JAPPANESE immigrents during the 1940’s.
In fact I believe it was a Democrat President who had a whole bunch of both locked up; even the ones who were born citizens.


52 posted on 06/03/2016 11:18:18 AM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
And internment of Japanese American citizens during WWII was? I can't think of anything in the Constitution barring a president from selecting who and who not the State Department, a department that reports to him directly, will issue visas to, nor on what basis that selection might be made. Otherwise how could we refuse to issue visas to anyone? That has nothing to do with formally establishing any specific religion as the official state supported faith. The former is a negative action directed at foreigners, the latter a positive and proscribed action.
53 posted on 06/03/2016 11:18:21 AM PDT by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lodi90
It is not unconstitutional. We are talking about foreign citizens wishing to enter the US. We can decide who can and cannot come into the country. Those wishing entry have no rights under the Constitution.

During the Cold War, we prohibited people from coming into the country who had ties to the Communist Party. We don't allow now people who have terrorist ties. Cole doesn't know what is and is not constitutional. Idiot.

54 posted on 06/03/2016 11:19:14 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

It is not a constitutional matter.


55 posted on 06/03/2016 11:20:10 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Maybe San Bernardino would not have happened, had we been more careful about the woman in particular.


56 posted on 06/03/2016 11:20:38 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

There are two kinds of Muslims. Those who wish to kill you today and those who will wish to kill you tomorrow. All in the name of Allah who wishes all non-Muslims dead.


57 posted on 06/03/2016 11:20:55 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Early life, education, and educating career[edit]
Cole was born in Shreveport, Louisiana, the son of Helen Te Ata (née Gale) and John D. Cole.[1] He is a fifth-generation Oklahoman, having been raised in Moore, Oklahoma. He graduated from Grinnell College in 1971 with a B.A. in history. His postgraduate degrees include an M.A. from Yale University (1974) and a Ph.D. from the University of Oklahoma (1984), both in British history. Cole’s PhD thesis was entitled Life and labor in the Isle of Dogs : the origins and evolution of an East London working-class community, 1800–1980. Cole did research abroad as a Thomas J. Watson Fellow and was a Fulbright Fellow (1977–78) at the University of London. He was a college professor in history and politics before becoming a politician.

Early political career[edit]
Following his mother Helen, who served as a state representative and senator, Cole served in the Oklahoma Senate from 1988 to 1991, resigning mid-term to accept a job in Washington. From 1995 to 1999, he was Oklahoma’s Secretary of State under Governor Frank Keating, and assisted with the recovery efforts following the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. He has also served as Chairman of the Oklahoma Republican Party.

Cole has been heavily involved in national politics as well, having served both as Executive Director of the NRCC and as Chief of Staff of the Republican National Committee (RNC).

Cole spent two years working as a paid consultant for the United States Chamber of Commerce, but his primary involvement in politics was as a political consultant for candidates. Along with partners Sharon Hargrave Caldwell and Deby Snodgrass, his firm (Cole, Hargrave, Snodgrass and Associates) played a large part in the reconstruction of Oklahoma’s political landscape, and backed a number of candidates that took office during the Republican Revolution of 1994. Among their clients have been Keating, J.C. Watts, Tom Coburn, Frank Lucas, Mary Fallin, Wes Watkins, Steve Largent, former Mississippi congressman Chip Pickering, and Hawaii governor Linda Lingle.

Comes from a LONG line of Government LEECHES! FUCK you Cole!


58 posted on 06/03/2016 11:21:05 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (I am "Chump" for Trump,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Sorry but your Muslim terrorist pals that you are using to overthrow legitimate governments, do not count as friends


59 posted on 06/03/2016 11:21:17 AM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

More dead wood to clean out.


60 posted on 06/03/2016 11:21:57 AM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson