Posted on 05/16/2016 7:54:23 AM PDT by Sybeck1
Donald J. Trump plans to throw Bill Clinton’s infidelities in Hillary Clinton’s face on live television during the presidential debates this fall, questioning whether she enabled his behavior and sought to discredit the women involved. Mr. Trump will try to hold her accountable for security lapses at the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and for the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens there. And he intends to portray Mrs. Clinton as fundamentally corrupt, invoking everything from her cattle futures trades in the late 1970s to the federal investigation into her email practices as secretary of state. Drawing on psychological warfare tactics that Mr. Trump used to defeat “Lyin’ Ted” Cruz, “Little Marco” Rubio and “Low-Energy” Jeb Bush in the Republican primaries, the Trump campaign is mapping out character attacks on the Clintons to try to increase their negative poll ratings and bait them into making political mistakes, according to interviews with Mr. Trump and his advisers.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
There just needs to be a long article, in which the reporter presents the results of an investigation into how much money the NYTimes is in hock for to Carlos Slim, Carlos Slim’s investments in the Mexican economy, and how Donald Trump’s policies would affect Carlos Slim’s investments.
We can provide these questions re Clintoon and her rapist husband:
Why Bill Clinton’s 26 Trips on the Lolita Express Child Rape Jet Matter
FrontPage Magazine ^ | May 15, 2016 | Daniel Greenfield
Posted on 5/16/2016, 8:42:37 AM by george76
We don’t know what Bill Clinton did or didn’t do in company with Jeffrey Epstein. But we certainly know what Epstein did and, almost as outrageously, what he got away with doing.
Some of the most shocking allegations against Epstein surfaced only after the conclusion of an FBI probe, in civil suits brought by his victims: for example, the claim that three 12-year-old French girls were delivered to him as a birthday present.
...
Sex crimes of the kind Roberts alleges took place typically carry a term of 10 to 20 years in federal prison. Yet when all was said and done, Epstein served his scant year-plus-one-month in a private wing of the Palm Beach jail and was granted a 16-hour-per-day free pass to leave the premises for work.
In short, Epstein was never actually in jail. During his “house arrest,” he flew around the country on his jets from his New York City place to his private island. At least one of Epstein’s victims claimed to have met Bill Clinton. And it turns out that Bill Clinton was a much more regular passenger on the Lolita Express.
...
Clinton’s presence aboard Jeffrey Epstein’s Boeing 727 on 11 occasions has been reported, but flight logs show the number is more than double
...
It doesn’t help that the Democratic establishment seems to have played a role in getting Epstein a pass on child rape, that Bill Clinton already had rape accusations in his past or that the Clintons had become notorious for their willingness to do favors for criminals in exchange for money.
Either way we’ve come a long way from Gary Hart being bounced for “Monkey Business” to Bill Clinton flying around on a child rapist’s plane without anyone in the media seeming to care much about it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3431041/posts
I don’t understand this emphasis on “decades of experience and qualifications” stuff. What good does “decades of experience and qualifications” do if you’re always screwing up? People get fired for screwing up, despite “decades of experience and qualifications.”
Why doesn’t some reporter bring up results, like management by results? (Guess because the results of Hillary’s “management” are always some gigantic debacle.)
I can assure you - hell would freeze over before the New York Times would do that story...
Exactly because neither Hillary nor her supporters can bring up her decades long result.
Therefore her qualification is she’s in public’s eyes for decades, plenty of titles, lots of speeches, and that’s enough for them. Like a participatory trophy is good enough for a POTUS position.
Thanks for brining this up, I need to correct my spelling in #57 - “Guffaw, guffaw, ....”
When Cruz announced, in his piercing, nasal voice, that Bill Clinton’s rapes, sodomy, etc., and Hillary’s enabling terror activities, were “off the table,” he unmasked himself as an establishment sock puppet. He was announcing that he intended to lose, like Bush 41, Dole, McCain, and Romney.
Bill Clinton Caught In ‘Epic Corruption’ Scandal Involving His Alleged Mistress!
Radaronline.com ^ | Posted on May 14, 2016 @ 10:22AM | By Sharon Churcher
Posted on 5/16/2016, 10:19:51 AM by b4its2late
‘It is just too much to ignore,’ blasts Washington insider of Hillary’s husband.
It’s Bill Clinton’s most outrageous sex scandal yet! Anti-corruption campaigners are demanding a fraud investigation into nearly $3 million in grants arranged by his charity and the federal government to a company co-owned by a beautiful divorcee identified by RadarOnline.com as his alleged “on-off” secret mistress.
The ex-President’s Clinton Global Initiative — run by the charitable foundation he heads with presidential hopeful Hillary and their daughter Chelsea — pledged a staggering $2 million to an obscure Nebraska private company, Energy Pioneer Solutions.
The company’s co-owners notably include Julie Tauber McMahon, a blond stunner with whom Bill was reportedly spotted sneaking around with in his hometown of Chappaqua, New York, durring Hillary’s first White House campaign.
Two other Clinton pals — the Democratic National Committee’s treasurer, Andrew Tobias, and Mark Weiner, who makes souvenirs for Hillary’s campaigns — also own a stake in the firm. Besides potentially profiting from the grants to Energy Pioneer Solutions, Radar has learned they made six-figure tax-deductible donations to the Clinton charity!
About $500,000 of the $3 million was pledged by another shapely blond, Kim Samuel, a Canadian steel and racing heiress. Bill, 69, additionally arranged in 2010 for $812,000 of taxpayers’ money to be given to the company by the Energy Department.
Samuel’s donation initially was logged in a database on the Global Initiative’s website. But the entry was removed a few months later. The reason reportedly was “to avoid calling attention to Mr. Clinton’s friendship” with his alleged mistress, McMahon, and to protect his charity’s reputation.
A Washington group that monitors political corruption, Judicial Watch, told Radar the entire situation stinks! The group’s president, Tom Fitton, explained: “Typically, when an entity deletes records like this, it is an indication of fraud.”
“The second issue is that this contribution was arranged by the charity to a company owned by friends and donors,” noted Fitton. “It raises the question of what the purpose was. Was it to take care of a Clinton ‘friend’ who published reports say was tied to him in a relationship? And was taxpayer money also used to take care of donors and this ‘friend’?”
“Reportedly there already is a criminal investigation into the Clinton Foundation as well as Hillary’s emails,” continued Fitton. “I think she’ll be prosecuted. It is just too much to ignore – classified emails on her private server, the contributions to the foundation by companies with business before her at the State Department and now this shell game with the charity. It’s epic corruption.”
A family who lived near McMahon’s mansion in the Clintons’ hometown of Chappaqua saw Bill pull up to her driveway in 2008, flanked by Secret Service SUVs.
McMahon is known as “Energizer” to Bill’s protection agents, according to former Wall Street Journal reporter Ronald Kessler’s tell-all book, The First Family Detail: Secret Service Agents Reveal Hidden Lives of the Presidents.
Though McMahon denied having a sexual relationship with Bill, an insider revealed in 2011 that “it became a running joke in the family.” The same source, who passed a polygraph test, also noted, “If Clinton traveled to London, we’d learn Julie was also visiting London. When Clinton went to France, we’d discover Julie was also in France.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3431080/posts
<> There needs to be a long article, in which the reporter presents the results of an investigation into how much money the NYT is in hock for to Carlos Slim, Carlos Slim’s investments in the Mexican economy, and how Donald Trump’s policies would affect Carlos Slim’s investments.<>
Clinton Foundation donors include dozens of media organizations, individuals
Politico ^ | 5/15/15 | JOSH GERSTEIN, TARINI PARTI, HADAS GOLD and DYLAN BYERS / FR Posted by Second Amendment First
NBC Universal, News Corporation, Turner Broadcasting and Thomson Reuters are among more than a dozen media organizations that have made charitable contributions to the Clinton Foundation in recent years, the foundation’s records show.
The donations, which range from the low-thousands to the millions, provide a picture of the media industry’s ties to the Clinton Foundation at a time when one of its most notable personalities, George Stephanopoulos, is under scrutiny for his previously undisclosed $75,000 contribution.
The list also includes mass media groups like Comcast, Time Warner and Viacom, as well a few notable individuals, including Carlos Slim, the Mexican telecom magnate and largest shareholder of The New York Times Company, and James Murdoch, the chief operating officer of 21st Century Fox. Both Slim and Murdoch have given between $1 million to $5 million, respectively.
Judy Woodruff, the co-anchor and managing editor of PBS NewsHour, gave $250 to the foundation’s “Clinton Haiti Relief Fund” in 2010.
The following list includes news media organizations that have donated to the foundation, as well as other media networks, companies, foundations or individuals that have donated. It is organized by the size of the contribution:
$1,000,000-$5,000,000
Carlos Slim Chairman & CEO of Telmex, largest New York Times shareholder
James Murdoch Chief Operating Officer of 21st Century Fox
Newsmax Media Florida-based conservative media network
Thomson Reuters Owner of the Reuters news service
$500,00-$1,000,000
News Corporation Foundation Philanthropic arm of former Fox News parent company
$250,000-$500,000
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publisher
Richard Mellon Scaife Owner of Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
$100,000-$250,000
Abigail Disney Documentary filmmaker
Bloomberg Philanthropies
Howard Stringer Former CBS, CBS News and Sony executive
Intermountain West Communications Company Local television affiliate owner (formerly Sunbelt Communications)
$50,000-$100,000
Bloomberg L.P.
Discovery Communications Inc.
George Stephanopoulos ABC News chief anchor and chief political correspondent
Mort Zuckerman Owner of New York Daily News and U.S. News & World Report
Time Warner Inc. Owner of CNN parent company Turner Broadcasting
$25,000-$50,000
AOL
HBO
Hollywood Foreign Press Association Presenters of the Golden Globe Awards
Viacom
$10,000-$25,000
Knight Foundation Non-profit foundation dedicated to supporting journalism
Public Radio International
Turner Broadcasting Parent company of CNN
$5,000-$10,000
Comcast Parent copmany of NBCUniversal
NBC Universal Parent company of NBC News, MSNBC and CNBC
Public Broadcasting Service
$1,000-$5,000
Robert Allbritton Owner of POLITICO parent company Capitol News Group
$250-$1,000
AOL Huffington Post Media Group
Hearst Corporation
Judy Woodruff PBS Newshour co-anchor and managing editor
The Washington Post Company
Good news. This will be an entirely different campaign that what McCain, Romney and what Cruz would have run. Remember Ted said that Bill was off limits.
“There just needs to be a long article, in which the reporter presents the results of an investigation into how much money the NYTimes is in hock for to Carlos Slim, Carlos Slim’s investments in the Mexican economy, and how Donald Trump’s policies would affect Carlos Slim’s investments.
I can assure you - hell would freeze over before the New York Times would do that story... “
Well, considering that Carlos Slim lent the NYT 250 million on what lenders commonly refer to as a “Mickey Finn” a couple of years ago, I wouldn’t go after Slim either....LOL!
I doubt it, they will allow here to play the sexist card, and say this is why we can’t have a person in the WH who verbally abuses people etc.
Then he will say, are you denying any of what I say?
Quite a résumé
Are you Leb Christian descended?
“The mistake in the Clinton impeachment in 1999, was that the Republicans went after him for private conduct”
It wasn’t private conduct.
Using the authority of your office to gain sexual favors from staff members is by definition sexual harassment in the workplace, the very issue for which he was being sued in federal court. He lied about this conduct to a federal judge in order to impede a civil rights lawsuit, and this was public conduct.
For this, Bill Clinton became the second president to be impeached.
I am wondering why the NY Slimes thinks this is a BAD thing. Hillary is a crook.
It wasn't a "mistake" either; it was quite deliberate.
The idea that the Government can define consensual conduct between adults as "sexual harassment," because of a Feminist theory that demonizes male advances, does not change the issue. (Now, do not get this wrong. When Bill Clinton exposed himself in a public setting, as an intended come on, he should have been arrested for lewd behavior, and taken into custody. That is not the Monica issue.)
But my point was really neither of those. The point of Abuse Of Power, was that Clinton should have been impeached for a very clear dereliction of his public duty; that his actions using his position of "Commander In Chief," to push an asexual agenda in the Military, at the expense of the effectiveness of that Military was indeed a grounds for impeachment. One many times more serious than simply yielding to temptation in private.)
If you want to go after some body, it is well to pick their most vulnerable point, not something much of the public will not consider serious.
That all being said...and I've said this for a while, I don't think Hillary will be the candidate. I think the poll numbers will tank and either Hillary chooses Sanders or Warren to try and increase the numbers but fails and withdraws due to health reasons. Warren/Sanders?
According to several leaked sources, she and Bill are planning to announce that Bill has a fatal disease. She will use that to insulate herself from criticism and claim that Trump is attacking a sick man who can no longer defend himself. She can then play the role of loyal wife, rather than her true self: child murderer (she had abortions), lesbian, liar, Marxist, pagan, and evil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.