Karlie Kloss did it better.
Posted on 05/15/2016 9:36:38 AM PDT by Helicondelta
GOP presumptive nominee Donald Trump referred to Sen. Elizabeth Warren (d-ma) as "Pocahontas" in an interview with New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, she wrote in a piece published Saturday.
Trump told Dowd that he had not been asked by House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) in his meeting with him last week to tone down his rhetoric directed at women.
Dowd also asked him if he had been criticized by Republicans for his Twitter feud with Warren.
"You mean Pocahontas?” Trump shot back.
Trump and Warren have engaged in a long battle on Twitter, trading barbs over his rhetoric toward women and her Native American heritage.
(Excerpt) Read more at talkingpointsmemo.com ...
Well, I don’t know what the issue is as I’m not a member of that group. But, there does seem to be a problem with his unfavorable rating with women that could turn the general election very very bad.
That is perfect. Love the new tone!
Pray America wakes
Karlie Kloss did it better.
That’s hilarious!
If Trump kept up to date with online memes like you do, he wouldn’t be a billionaire or the presumptive president.
Trump is getting in their face and they don’t get it.
“But, there does seem to be a problem with his unfavorable rating with women that could turn the general election very very bad.”
I think you are succumbing to being spun. This is a media that is dominated, as Ben Rhodes said, by 27 y/o know nothings. These opinion polls, we know, have decreasing validity in an era where every exiting technology is failing in predictive power.
I am not telling you I can predict the future any better than anyone else. The people who are so polarized over this single-issue “woman” thing are hard-wired HRC voters almost certainly not susceptible to voting for Trump. If they vote with their genitalia, then that’s their story. These same people are thus simultaneously ratifying accepting HRCs behavior protecting Bill, a known rapist, but you NEVER HEAR A WORD about that.
I for one do not think women are so stupid that this is how they vote. Some are, of course, but lots of Dem voters operate at these bumper-sticker levels of mental dimness. After they themselves this story 573 times like the media is going to tell them to do, some independent-thinking neurons may work themselves free. But you cannot help (nor educate) folks who are beyond help.
Is there some good polling that indicates Trump is doing well with women?
He cracks me up!
She claims her high cheekbones prove she’s a Native American. Heck, I have high cheekbones. Can I get in on the gravy train? My DNA test says I’m 100% European, Ashkenazi Jew. But what’s a DNA test when you have high cheekbones?
Do a quick scroll through all three pages for great graphics.
I don’t know. I don’t pay attention to polls, they have mis-called virtually every race so far. But notice how rarely they say “we were wrong”?
I do not know what “good polling” is. Logically, there must be “good” (I will assume you and I both mean “accurate”) by that term and “bad”, or inaccurate polling.
But without any question if we believe in nature and natural phenomena, there absolutely MUST be a gaussian distribution of “good” and “bad” polls.
Yet almost ALL polls say the exact same thing, which is what you posit, that Trump is not doing well with women.
So my conclusion is: There is or must be plenty of BAD polling that says he’s doing poorly with women, but whatever we might decide is GOOD polling says exactly the same thing. The fact that this is endlessly repeated by the media is why I think it has zero validity, and is an attempt at spin and nothing more.
I also believe this multisex bathroom thing is going to swamp, obliterate genitalianism when it comes to women worrying about their feewings getting hurt.
“Oh, my gosh. What a rube. It’s Fauxcohantas. The learning curve is steep with this one.”
Yeah, what a clod. Not like those smart sixteen people he just mud stomped.
Stop paying attention to libtard pundits.
Hillary is doing as badly with men as Trump is with women.
Why not post that the election could turn “very very bad” for her?
I hope you are not a lib plant.
I predate you here by over 16 years, who the hell planted me then to oppose DT today?
The graphics are priceless !
Subject is just open for ridicule.
She may pass mustard in Mass
But elsewhere she’s just showing her azz
A good move. Helps to remind those who may NOT know just how phony she is.
What r ya? Some kinda genitalianismphobist?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
