Posted on 05/11/2016 1:19:02 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
South Carolina senator and former Republican presidential candidate Lindsey Graham has been a sharp and frequent critic of his partys presumptive presidential nominee, Donald Trump, but on Wednesday he changed his tune slightly. While saying that he still cannot support Trump for president, Graham however said that he sees some good ideas in Trumps proposals and believes the former reality television star could win the White House in November.
But it wont happen unless he changes the way he presents himself to the public, Graham added, because crazy loses to crooked.
(Excerpt) Read more at thefiscaltimes.com ...
Nobody wants. doublegaited!
Hey Lindsay, and RINO loses to Real. Lindsay, I’m quite sure south Carolina is done with reelecting you.
Seriously, Graham sounds unhinged lately.
He’s being a real Jag-off.
Strange is it not that Lindsey Graham is the only surviving elected politician that wrote the ‘articles of impeachment’ for bjClinton? How did that happen?
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0504.earle.html
But when the votes were taken in committee on four separate articles of impeachment, Graham voted against one count dealing with whether Clinton had perjured himself in his deposition in the Paula Jones civil lawsuit, making him the only Judiciary Committee Republican to oppose an impeachment article. Graham’s reasoning was that all kinds of people might be tempted to lie about their sex lives in a civil case. “He was looking at the constitutional standard and taking it seriously,” said Craig. Graham’s opposition, Craig believes, is the reason the article later failed on the House floor. “That was Lindsey Graham,” he told me. “I’m sure it’s [because of] Lindsey Graham.” Ironically, Craig said, that article would have been among the most difficult for Clinton’s team to defend against because of some of Clinton’s statements during the civil deposition. “Some people might say that Lindsey Graham, because of his opposition to the Paula Jones article, was responsible for saving the president a good deal of trouble.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.