Skip to comments.
USS Zumwalt, DDG-1000, complete 2nd US Navy acceptance Trials
FR
| May 11, 2016
| Jeff Head
Posted on 05/11/2016 9:06:31 AM PDT by Jeff Head
This is one of the best pictures of the new USS Zumwalt destroyer yet.
width=1000>
There she is on her second (very successful) US Navy acceptance trials and will soon be turnd over to the US Navy soon.
They will put her through her paces for the next 18 or more months before commissioning in late 2017 or so. Beautiful and very powerful, modern vessel. The second will launch soon.
See my Flickr Album on this Ship for much more information
TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: boondoggle; ddg1000; pos; steathdestroyer; usnavy; usszumwalt; wasteofmoney; worthless; zumwalt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Thought a lot of FR military and naval enthusiast would enjoy this.
1
posted on
05/11/2016 9:06:31 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
To: LS; Jim Robinson; Squantos; Travis McGee; The Shrew; joanie-f; BETTY BOP; Alamo-Girl
FYI...beautiful, powerful ship.
2
posted on
05/11/2016 9:07:50 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Semper Fidelis - Molon Labe - Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: Jeff Head
It’d pretty naked. No gun turrets?
3
posted on
05/11/2016 9:10:35 AM PDT
by
refermech
To: Jeff Head
Awesome ship, but who gets to clean the whale blubber and guts from the bow when it reaches port?
4
posted on
05/11/2016 9:11:11 AM PDT
by
CivilWarBrewing
(Females DESTROYED America.)
To: Jeff Head
LOL, thanks for the thread, JH. I must admit to being a traditionalist, and while she might be quite powerful in many respects, I have always thought she had a face only a mother could love!
Now, after chewing on it for a bit, I thought some dazzle cammo might make her appear more war-like:
5
posted on
05/11/2016 9:12:07 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
("Irrational violence against muslims" is a myth, but "Irrational violence against non-muslims" isn't)
To: Jeff Head
Ironclad designers from the Civil War seem to have had the right ideas in this regard.
6
posted on
05/11/2016 9:13:48 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: rlmorel
Can’t see it due to the camo.
7
posted on
05/11/2016 9:15:12 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: refermech
Concealed Carry on a very large scale :)
8
posted on
05/11/2016 9:15:42 AM PDT
by
katana
To: Jeff Head
What a weird bow wave. That can’t be good from a hydrodynamic standpoint.
9
posted on
05/11/2016 9:16:50 AM PDT
by
DaxtonBrown
(wrote Harry Reid.s only biography www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
To: refermech
Those two triangular structures forward are 5 inch gun mounts, the barrels are covered for stealth purposes.
They are gun mounts which are set into a gun ring and would fall off if the ship rolled over too far. Turrets are an integral part of the ships structure and extend down to the keel.
10
posted on
05/11/2016 9:17:59 AM PDT
by
GMMC0987
To: Jeff Head
As an ex-squid and maritime enthusiast, I have to say that this is the ugliest ship I have ever laid eyes on. That said, I imagine the same thing being said by sailors on their first glimpse of the USS Monitor.
But yeah, I really hate the modern world.
11
posted on
05/11/2016 9:19:28 AM PDT
by
NRx
(Self Censored)
To: Jeff Head
I wonder when the Chinese will roll out their copy.
To: GMMC0987
They are 155mm. Some pretty interesting engineering on those guns and the rounds they will be shooting.
13
posted on
05/11/2016 9:21:47 AM PDT
by
USNBandit
(Sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: USNBandit
Yup. Very advanced gun system. Impressive range and accuracy.
Plus its got missiles.
Plus its got lots of power for a railgun.
This is a destroyer which is pretty much a stealthy battleship.
14
posted on
05/11/2016 9:29:10 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Nation States seem to be ending. The follow-on should not be Globalism, but Localism.)
To: Jeff Head
The ugliest ship I have ever seen. Lord pray for fast exponential increases in computing processing power so this stealth design craze passes.
15
posted on
05/11/2016 9:29:16 AM PDT
by
DesertRhino
("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,)
To: Jeff Head; FRiends; Jim Robinson
Call me old-fashioned, but I like the
ship that JimRob served on better.
The times they are a-changing.
Click the Pic
Support Free Republic
16
posted on
05/11/2016 9:29:38 AM PDT
by
deoetdoctrinae
(Donate monthly and end FReepathons)
To: ClearCase_guy
Evidently, it has some interesting electrical advances, as well.
17
posted on
05/11/2016 9:31:08 AM PDT
by
USNBandit
(Sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: rlmorel
How to annoy your neighbors:
18
posted on
05/11/2016 9:35:41 AM PDT
by
PLMerite
(Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
To: DaxtonBrown
It may be an unfamiliar bow wave to you or many but that does not necessarily translate to being inefficient hydrodynamically. As a very simplified rule of thumb, if a hull is producing a large bow or stern wave, that is a indicator of inefficiency in that lots of water is being brute force pushed around at the expense of the hull propelling forward.
The Zumwalt type hull is a wave piercing design closer to what is common for a catamaran hull than to the typical semi displacement traditionally used for warships.
To: USNBandit
Remember on Star Trek when Kirk would say, “All power to forward shields”?
My understanding is that the Zumwalt puts out enough energy to power a small city and if it comes to a stop it can divert all that power to a railgun. If it had a railgun.
Additional tidbit: the Zumwalt is skippered by Capt Kirk. Seriously.
20
posted on
05/11/2016 9:42:25 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Nation States seem to be ending. The follow-on should not be Globalism, but Localism.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson