Posted on 04/25/2016 11:33:19 AM PDT by Red Steel
The idea was floated over the weekend by Jon Karl on ABC, as youll see below, and started some conservative tweeters chattering. I think theres more upside to it than downside, but there are downsides.
Cruz needs media oxygen in the next week, a way to have the story not just be Trump's NE sweep. Not a lot of ways to get that.
Ross Douthat (@DouthatNYT) April 25, 2016
Picking a running mate now could limit his dealmaking options at the convention. But first you gotta get to the convention.
Ross Douthat (@DouthatNYT) April 25, 2016
Cruz is going to get blown out again tomorrow night, which raises the question of how he wants to spend the next week ahead of the big vote in Indiana. If he does nothing, hell spend most of his time fielding questions about collusion with John Kasich and whether his wipeout in the northeast proves that the party has come around to Trump. If he names a VP, hell spend most of his time talking about his veep pick and how it fits into his vision for America. Thats a move a would-be nominee makes, not an also-ran. Karl suggests, probably correctly, that Carly Fiorina is the frontrunner. Not only was Fiorina the first former candidate to endorse Cruz, she was the first big name to support him after various Washington Republicans had signed on with Rubio. If Cruz were to name her this week, hed got a ton of buzz for putting a woman on the ticket and Fiorina would instantly be elevated to a super-surrogate who could barnstorm Indiana and other states as a draw in her own right to turn voters out for Cruz. Fiorina was also the most effective attack dog in the field against Trump during the debates. If you wanted someone on the trail on your behalf making the case for why a contested convention, with all the chaos it entails, is a better option than nominating Donald Trump, thats who youd pick. And dont forget the regional play at stake: Fiorina graduated from Stanford and ran for Senate in 2010 in California, by far the most important state left on the board. If she can help Cruz hold Trump down there, thats reason enough to pick her given its role in deciding the eventual nominee. And Fiorina helps in the general election too, of course, blunting Hillarys pitch to women voters. There are lots of advantages in naming her.
So what not do it? The risk you run in naming a VP when youre not the nominee yet is that voters will see it as a stunt, which is what it is, and stunts smell of desperation. Thats extra risky for Cruz given that hes just pulled another stunt in colluding with Kasich in Indiana. Instead of seeing him as more presidential, some voters may view the veep pick as a gimmick by a fading candidate to try to revive his campaign. On top of that, it would limit Cruzs strategic options later. Cruzs chances at the convention may turn on his ability to horse-trade more effectively than Trump. If Trump offers Kasich the VP slot, what does Cruz counter with if that positions already been filled by Fiorina? In fact, notes John McCormack, if youre all about consolidating anti-Trumpers and winning California in June, wouldnt it be smarter for Cruz to offer Kasich the VP slot now? No alliance will unite the two camps voters like that would. And if Kasich wont accept the offer now, wouldnt it be better to wait a few weeks and try again than to appoint someone now in case he becomes more amenable in mid-May? To paraphrase Rod Blagojevich, the vice presidency is a f***ing valuable thing.
I dont think Cruz can wait for Kasich to figure out what he wants, though. Indiana is must-win. If picking someone this week would help win it, do it and worry about Cleveland the day after Indianas in the bag. Exit question: Is there any VP pick who might end up being blocked at the convention? Patrick Ruffini raised that possibility last night in contemplating the possibility of a Trump/Kasich ticket. What if, Ruffini wondered, Kasich made a deal with Trump to endorse him, all but handing him the nomination in exchange for the VP slot, and Cruzs delegates responded by refusing to vote for Kasich for vice president? Remember, theres no such thing as a bound delegate when it comes to the VP race; the delegates can vote for whoever they want. Ttypically the nominees choice is rubber-stamped, but since many (if not a majority) of delegates at the convention will be pro-Cruz, theyd be free to block Kasich even if Trump picked him. In reality, I doubt theyd have the nerve: Having been forced by the rules to nominate Trump on the first ballot, theyd support whoever Trump wanted for vice president before washing their hands of the general election. But they have the power to block if they choose to exercise it.
.@jonkarl says Ted Cruz may name a running mate soon to shake up the raceand he has a guess as to who that might be https://t.co/c7VhTPFe0V
This Week (@ThisWeekABC) April 25, 2016
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
It is a stunt and would be seen as such, especially if Cruz selects someone like Carly Fiorina.
See, MailmanJr is going to announce as VP. Anybody's VP that will have him lol.
Haha!
Yep, noticed that. And Carly was annoying and obnoxious as usual in that instance too.
That picture screams: “A bottom that needs to be slapped, but not too much, I’m very {insert Savage voice} sennnnnsitive!”
I agree.
Go Cruz/i-carly!
Why do the Germans use so many letters for a word!?
Diarrhea of the letter!
Very cool language though, don’t get me wrong.
“Ted Sleaze and Snarly Carly.”
Can you Trumpheads do anything beside call names?
I don’t know.
My only German ancestors had a 4 or 5 letter surname, depending on how the guys at Ellis Island spelled their surname.
We win.
Should Cruz pick who will never be his VP this week?
“I actually like Carly... Shed make a killer VP. “
She would eat chew up Hillary and spit her out.
KSuck & Crucifer
“Can’t think of a more off-putting set of physiognomies (”faces” to those of you in Rio Linda).
They say that in this visual TV age, Abe Lincoln couldn’t be elected...and that’s probably true.”
Are you Trump’s hairdresser?
How about this one!
You have had some really great ones as this race rolls on!
Thanks for your talent and humor!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.