Posted on 04/12/2016 12:02:01 PM PDT by GilGil
Conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly says six state leaders are ousting her from the Eagle Forum organization she founded because of her support of Donald Trump, and five of them support Sen. Ted Cruz.
Schlafly released a statement Monday claiming the group is trying to take over the organization by controlling bank accounts, firing employees and hiring their own.
“I think it’s an attempt to vote me out,” Schlafly told the conservative World Net Daily. “It’s disloyal, and it’s terribly shocking, and I’m completely depressed about it.”
Among those Schlafly called out by name Monday was Cathie Adams, who served as Texas Eagle Forum president for the last 23 years.
(Excerpt) Read more at trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com ...
You characterize the Reagan administration as "failed?" I think you are on the wrong forum.
Conservative principled need to be overhauled.
As in "fundamentally transformed?"
Trump properly analyzed, truly is A Mataphor For American Conservatism.
I am truly sorry--as one who was until recently neutral between Trump & Cruz, to see the Texas Senator encouraging his supporters to misrepresent Trump's position. Surely, he is betraying his very clearly avowed Faith in encouraging such tactics, and that is terribly sad.
Where, exactly, do you get that Cruz would “take from the wealthy and redistribute to the faithful?”
Seriously?
Reagan was not president 20 years ago last I checked. Conservatives have failed the country for 20 years!
This is just like the case of Obama sitting in Rev. Wright's church for 20 years and saying that none of what was preached was the way he thought. Just sayin'
I think personal belief is sacred and whether I find it savory or not is irrelevant.
But for a person applying to take on the awesome responsibility of President, it is of concern to me when he has a belief system where his religion gives him the role of stripping the wealth from the people that hold it and giving it to the members of his church. The rights of those not of his faith are not held as valid. I think a voter would have to be very naive to put in power a person who professes these beliefs unless they were set to be on the receiving end.
Schaffly is 91 years old her daughter was allegedly in on the coup, perhaps Mom is a few cans short of a 6 pack these days and her daughter is trying to keep her from being exploited?
In a couple of weeks, these Cruzies may be changing their tune.
Don't be an idiot. You know Donald the Duck contributed to the Hillary for President run. Supported Hairy Reed. Schummer. All the progressives
Stop lying to yourself and others.
Why do you say untruths. Trump has gone on record multiple times saying he would defund PP as long as they are in the Abortion business. The clip is even linked on Life Site News website.
If you do not want to vote for Trump knock your socks off but if you haven’t actually read his website position statements and listened to full interviews instead of misleading gottcha clips you should realize that you may be being played.
Trump has been Conservative about Trade, Immigration, the Wall, eliminating Common Core and devolving the responsibility to the States, ending Obama care and substituting HSA and competition for Private plans across State lines.
People have lied repeatedly about his statements of Government Healthcare. In 2000 Trump said single payer had worked for some countries and the Senate had a plan with many choices that could be adapted. Within a couple of years he siad the time for single payer had passed in America and perhaps it never would have worked. His references to Government paying for healthcare are restricted to the indigent and Medicare.
Trump loves our country and wants to return jobs and create a climate that will attract & return industries. He has a common sense approach to closing down Government over reach. Listening to his interviews from 1980 until the present the same themes emerge. Trump was not a politician and was not then nor is he now ideologically pure. But contrasted to the slick politicians that know the buzz words he actually believes the things he says and is committed to bringing American prosperity back rather than giving lip service and keeping his mouth to the political/lobbyist teat.
GilGil, you brute! You bruised this dude's petals .....
Tells me that not only is the Republican Party tearing itself apart over this election, the entire Conservative Movement is in the process of doing so.
I don’t know, many of them are sites I haven’t been to before, so I don’t really know their positions on the spectrum.
I tried to pick several different ones from a religious one to the Washington Post so people could decide themselves. I thought that the sites were useful because they provided links to Cruz and his father speaking themselves about their beliefs. There is a 20+ minute video of a service that bothe Cruz’s participated that really opened my eyes to Dominionism, which I had never even heard of before.
Quite possible. But, maybe he does what he says he’s gonna do with the border and jobs. Frankly the 2 most important issues and the only ones that will effect a change of direction in this country.
We know how the Rino/GoPe will govern, fade to collectivism.
We know how the Hillary/Obama/Dems will govern, rammed down our throats collectivism.
We have no history of how Trump will govern, but he has won the hearts and souls of millions with his border and jobs promises.
.
Comparative analysis. Clearly he is not worse than Hillary, and at least as equal to any of the Cruz/GoPe types in policy. If he turns out to be a bald face liar, does a 180 on his campaign promises, are we worse off than with a Dem or GoPe type. No.
THerefore ;
Possible, having few strings attached from the global lobby that we can see, maybe, just maybe he will do policy as he promises.
Now is that not worth the risk, given the other alternatives.
Plus, Trump is the only R who can win FL at this point. Simple math.
Without FL the Dems win.
Inside the Christian Right Dominionist Movement That's Undermining Democracy
Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin have all flirted with Christian Right Dominionism, but there's lots of misinformation about just what that means. Dominionists want to impose a form of Christian nationalism on the United States, a concept that was dismissed as eroding freedom and democracy by the founders of our country. Dominionism has become a major influence on the right-wing populist Tea Parties as Christian Right activists have flooded into the movement at the grassroots.
At the same time, legitimate questions have been raised about whether or not potential Republican presidential nominees Rick Perry, Michelle Bachmann, or Sarah Palin have moved from a generic form of Christian Right Dominionism toward the more totalitarian form know as Dominion Theology.
Clueless journalists and crafty Christian Right pundits have mocked the idea that Dominionism as a religiously motivated political tendency even exists. Scholars, however, have been writing about Dominionism for over a decade, some using the term directly, and others describing the tendency in other ways. Many articles on Dominionism can be found on Talk to Action, especially by authors Rachel Tabachnick, Bruce Wilson, Frederick Clarkson. Several of the authors who pioneered the discussion of Dominionism have written for the Public Eye Magazine.
Dominionism is a broad political impulse within the Christian Right in the United States. It comes in a variety of forms that author Fred Clarkson and I call soft and hard. Fred and I probably coined the term "Dominionism" back in the 1990s, but in any case we certainly were the primary researchers who organized its use among journalists and scholars.
Clarkson noted three characteristics that bridge both the hard and the soft kind of Dominionism.
Dominionists celebrate Christian nationalism, in that they believe the United States once was, and should again be, a Christian nation. In this way, they deny the Enlightenment roots of American democracy.
Dominionists promote religious supremacy, insofar as they generally do not respect the equality of other religions, or even other versions of Christianity.
Dominionists endorse theocratic visions, believing that the Ten Commandments, or "biblical law," should be the foundation of American law, and that the U.S. Constitution should be seen as a vehicle for implementing Biblical principles.
At the apex of hard Dominionism is the religious dogma of Dominion Theology, with two major branches: Christian Reconstructionism and Kingdom Now theology. It is the latter's influence on the theopolitical movement called the New Apostolic Reformation that has been linked in published reports to potential Republican presidential nominees Perry, Bachmann or Palin. All three of these right-wing political debutantes have flirted with Christian Right Dominionism, but how far they have danced toward the influence of hard-right Dominion Theology is in dispute. It would be nice if some "mainstream" journalists actually researched the question.
"While differing from Reconstructionism in many ways, Kingdom Now shares the belief that Christians have a mandate to take dominion over every area of life," explains religion scholar Bruce Barron. And it is just this tendency that has spread through evangelical Protestantism, resulting in the emergence of "various brands of `dominionist' thinkers in contemporary American evangelicalism," according to Barron.
The most militant Dominion Theologists would silence dissenters and execute adulterers, homosexuals and recalcitrant children. No...seriously. OK, they would only be executed for repeated offenses, explain some defenders of Christian Reconstructionism. Even most Christian Right activists view the more militant Dominion Theologists as having really creepy ideas.
Much of the controversy over the issue of Dominionism is caused by writers who use the term carelessly, often conflating the broad term Dominionism with the narrow term Dominion Theology. Some on the Left have implied that every conservative Christian evangelical is part of the Christian Right political movement; and that everyone in the Christian Right is an active Dominionist. This is false. Some critics even state that the Christian Right is neofascist. Few serious scholars of fascism agree with that assessment, although several admit that if triggered by a traumatic societal event, any contemporary right-wing populist movement could descend into neofascism.
Advocates of Dominion Theology go beyond the democracy eroding theocracy of Dominionism into a totalitarian form of religious power called a "theonomy," in which pluralistic democracy and religious tolerance are seen as a problem to be solved by godly men carrying out God's will. Karen Armstrong calls Christian Reconstructionism "totalitarian" because it leaves "no room for any other view or policy, no democratic tolerance for rival parties, no individual freedom." Matthew N. Lyons and I call Christian Reconstructionism a "new form of clerical fascist politics," in our book Right-Wing Populism in America, because we see it echoing the religiously based clerical fascist movements that existed during World War II in countries including Romania and Hungary.
According to Fred Clarkson:
Reconstructionists believe that there are three main areas of governance: family government, church government, and civil government. Under God's covenant, the nuclear family is the basic unit. The husband is the head of the family, and wife and children are "in submission" to him. In turn, the husband "submits" to Jesus and to God's laws as detailed in the Old Testament. The church has its own ecclesiastical structure and governance. Civil government exists to implement God's laws. All three institutions are under Biblical Law, the implementation of which is called "theonomy."
Christian Reconstructionists believe that as more Christians adopt Dominion Theology, they will eventually convert the majority of Americans. Then the country will realize that the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights are merely codicils to Old Testament biblical law. Because they believe this is God's will, they scoff at criticism that what they plan is a revolutionary overthrow of the existing system of government. Over the past 20 years the leading proponents of Reconstructionism have included founder Rousas John (R.J.) Rushdoony, Gary North, Greg Bahnsen, David Chilton, Gary DeMar, and Andrew Sandlin. Kingdom Now theology emerged from the Latter Rain Pentacostal movement and the concept of Spiritual Warfare against the literal demonic forces of Satan. It has been promoted by founder Earl Paulk as well as C. Peter Wagner, founder of the New Apostolic Reformation movement.
For many, President Obama and the Democratic Party are among these "demonic forces." This has real world consequences.
In 2006 former Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris told thousands of cheering Christian Right activists that beating the Democrats in the upcoming elections was a battle against "principalities and powers," which many in the audience would hear as a Biblical reference to the struggle with the demonic agents of Satan. Harris (who played "ballot bowling" in Florida to elect George W. Bush in 2000) told the audience at the annual Values Voter Summit in Washington DC that she had studied religion in Switzerland with the godfather of the Christian Right, theologian Francis A. Schaeffer. Her speech there, which I witnessed and wrote about, qualifies her as a Dominionist.
In 2004 Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, another Dominionist, oversaw the election apparatus giving his favored candidate George W. Bush a boost into the Oval Office.
Religion scholar Bruce Barron explains that "unlike the Christian Right, Reconstructionism is not simply or primarily a political movement; it is first and foremost an educational movement fearlessly proclaiming an ideology of total world transformation." According to sociologist Sara Diamond, Christian Reconstructionism spread the "concept that Christians are Biblically mandated to `occupy' all secular institutions" to the extent that it became "the central unifying ideology for the Christian Right."
William Martin is the author of the 1996 tome With God on Our Side, a companion volume to the PBS series of the same name (Martin and I were both advisers to the PBS series). Martin is a sociologist and professor of religion at Rice University, and he has been critical of the way some critics of the Christian Right have tossed around the terms "dominionism" and "theocracy." According to Martin:
It is difficult to assess the influence of Reconstructionist thought with any accuracy. Because it is so genuinely radical, most leaders of the Religious Right are careful to distance themselves from it. At the same time, it clearly holds some appeal for many of them. One undoubtedly spoke for others when he confessed, `Though we hide their books under the bed, we read them just the same.' Martin reveals that "several key leaders have acknowledged an intellectual debt to the theonomists." The late Christian Right leaders Jerry Falwell and D. James Kennedy "endorsed Reconstructionist books" for example. Before he died in 2001, the founder of Christian Reconstuctionism, R. J. Rushdoony, appeared several times on Christian Right televangelist programs such as Pat Robertson's 700 Club and the program hosted by D. James Kennedy.
"Pat Robertson makes frequent use of `dominion' language," says Martin. Robertson's book, The Secret Kingdom, "has often been cited for its theonomy elements; and pluralists were made uncomfortable when, during his presidential campaign, he said he `would only bring Christians and Jews into the government,' as well as when he later wrote, `There will never be world peace until God's house and God's people are given their rightful place of leadership at the top of the world.' "
Martin also pointed out that Jay Grimstead, who led the Coalition on Revival, "brought Reconstructionists together with more mainstream evangelicals." According to Martin, Grimstead explained "`I don't call myself [a Reconstructionist]," but "A lot of us are coming to realize that the Bible is God's standard of morality...in all points of history...and for all societies, Christian and non-Christian alike....It so happens that Rushdoony, Bahnsen, and North understood that sooner."
Then Grimstead added, "there are a lot of us floating around in Christian leadership--James Kennedy is one of them--who don't go all the way with the theonomy thing, but who want to rebuild America based on the Bible."
So let's choose our language carefully, but let's recognize that terms such as Dominionism and Theocracy, when used cautiously and carefully, are appropriate when describing troubling tendencies in the Christian Right that are helping push the current political scene toward confrontation and intolerance.
Cruz dropped Palin when he he found out she wouldn't dress up as a blind chick for him...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.