There’s no usurping of the people’s will here.
You are joking, right...? You as a voter have no problem with a delegate who subverts your will by resorting to arcane subterfuge in order to impose his ‘superior’ political will on you, by voting for someone other than you did...?
You’re OK with tactics designed to bring such subterfuge into the process, so as to acheive the goal of the minority, and to rub your political insignificance in your face...?
The rules are that the delegates elected, no matter who they are “loyal” to, MUST vote for whom they were elected on the first ballot!
First, explain to me, given what I wrote above, how that is “subverting my will”? Then and only then will I address the rest of your post, because with all due respect, I don’t think you’re understanding my point here.