The rules are that the delegates elected, no matter who they are “loyal” to, MUST vote for whom they were elected on the first ballot!
First, explain to me, given what I wrote above, how that is “subverting my will”? Then and only then will I address the rest of your post, because with all due respect, I don’t think you’re understanding my point here.
Then and only then will I address the rest of your post, because with all due respect, I don’t think you’re understanding my point here.
I understand perfectly what you’re saying...but the entire concept of a ‘bound delegate’ reverting to ‘free agency’ in the event of an artificial threshold (which is the topic being discussed here, is it not?) is subversive to your original vote..and we know there are delegates who intend to do just that, should the occasion arise, because they know better than you or I...
what I don’t get is why you would support a system that, however infrequent, would allow for your original vote to be voided...?