1 posted on
03/26/2016 4:36:39 PM PDT by
Hojczyk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: Hojczyk
2 posted on
03/26/2016 4:38:03 PM PDT by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west))
To: Hojczyk
We should stop buying from the Saudis out of principle. We need to be energy independent, period.
4 posted on
03/26/2016 4:38:36 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: Hojczyk
5 posted on
03/26/2016 4:39:10 PM PDT by
onyx
(You're here posting, so sign-up to DONATE MONTHLY!)
To: Hojczyk
The elite vested PTB are going to be PISSED at this kind of talk.
6 posted on
03/26/2016 4:39:28 PM PDT by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: Hojczyk
HOW ABOUT JUST BECAUSE THEY FUND TERROR, LIKELY 9/11!!
Great Idea!
7 posted on
03/26/2016 4:39:51 PM PDT by
dp0622
To: Hojczyk
Trump hits another one out of the park.
8 posted on
03/26/2016 4:40:13 PM PDT by
Leaning Right
(Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: Hojczyk
Great idea. Just what we need - higher gas prices. That’ll show ‘em! /sarc
10 posted on
03/26/2016 4:41:43 PM PDT by
Forgotten Amendments
(Nessie ... Sasquatch ... The Free Syrian Army ...)
To: Hojczyk
The Department of Energy was established with the intent of working towards energy independence. As with any other bureaucracy, it was determined that it would not be able to justify its existence if it solved the problem it was established to solve, so it became a matter of its own survival to manage the problem rather than actually do anything about it.
Establishing energy independence would not only be a good thing in and of itself, but would also make it much harder for a big chunk of the bureaucracy to perpetuate itself.
13 posted on
03/26/2016 4:42:54 PM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
To: Hojczyk
Great idea. When the House of Saud falls to Islamic extremists, life will be good again. I can’t imagine what extremist would do with billions of dollars. Probably they will use it for humanitarian projects.
16 posted on
03/26/2016 4:45:38 PM PDT by
Starstruck
(I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
To: Hojczyk
BOOM!
17 posted on
03/26/2016 4:46:28 PM PDT by
McGruff
(Ted. You got some esplainin to do.)
To: Hojczyk
The ONLY thing that Trump would have to do is trash the Low-sulfur requirement, that FORCES American Companies to import Saudi/Venezuelean oil instead of using American oil for gasoline.
End of Saudi oil purchases....
18 posted on
03/26/2016 4:48:04 PM PDT by
tcrlaf
(They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
To: Hojczyk
Golly gee whiz, doesn't he know how much better off we are exporting our oil and buying Saudi oil?
He must have missed yet another memo.
19 posted on
03/26/2016 4:49:04 PM PDT by
Rashputin
(Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
To: Hojczyk
"Consider it."
Well played.
Mr. niteowl77
To: Hojczyk
Another great move by Trump!
To: Hojczyk
25 posted on
03/26/2016 4:54:12 PM PDT by
JPJones
To: Hojczyk
I thought that it had been shown on FR in the past that there is no way to effectively do that because unless every other country stopped purchases of Saudi oil it would still end up in the world market and in American purchases.
And what would Trump do about oil the Refineries that the Saudis own, nationalize them? I am all for holding the Saudis accountable, but is this just more attractive talk from Trump that really hasn't a chance in reality?
28 posted on
03/26/2016 4:55:14 PM PDT by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: Hojczyk
About FREAKIN’ TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To: Hojczyk
We've got a lot of sweet shale oil in this country, so why are buying oil from our enemies? Put American oil producers, American royalty owners and their American workers back to work, help spin-off American business that depend on them. Just buy enough from the bedouins to keep gas prices affordable.
GoTrump
34 posted on
03/26/2016 4:57:01 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: Hojczyk
There was a news article last week about the Saudis (Saudi Aramco)and Shell ending a partnership in which they had a couple of refineries here in the US. The Saudis took control of a refinery that processes mostly imported oil.
It said they are interested in buying more refineries here in the US. What are the chances they try to use oil from the United States at these refineries, and why would we allow Saudi Aramco to have a refinery here in the first place? Crap like this has to stop.
40 posted on
03/26/2016 4:59:44 PM PDT by
rwh
To: Hojczyk
Amen!
That said he’d need to also couple it with offsetting the balance between the shia and Sunnis...dear leader 0bama has altered that.
42 posted on
03/26/2016 5:00:42 PM PDT by
CincyRichieRich
(Trump is the ticket or the republic ends.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
