Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should Trump and Cruz unite with we the people against the establishment uni-party?

Posted on 03/16/2016 1:31:00 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

The biggest plus is a Trump/Cruz ticket would immediately secure the nomination for us (the majority of the right-leaning grassroots voters), end any possibility of a GOPe betrayal at the convention, and would ensure the Republican party is finally with we the grassroots people (tea party, conservatives, religious people, economic conservatives, business people, middle class, blue collar, national security patriots, etc, ie, a rebirth of the Reagan Coalition) and against the globalist GOP big government establishment. It’d be a yuuuge middle finger to the elite ruling classes of both parties.

And it would have coattails guaranteeing a pro-America landslide against the America-hating Marxists and a strengthening of the Republican majority in the congress and in local and state governments. And finally begin a return to constitutional, pro-America, pro-free-market government and a reversal of the slide into godless socialism and globalism.

A mandate from we the people to secure the borders, enforce the law, deport the illegals, end sanctuary cities, end the war on Christianity, cut the taxes, cut the government, cut the regulations, end the war on American industry, end the war on coal gas & oil, bring back a growing economy, bring back manufacturing and jobs, and rebuild the military.

Unlike the GOPe, this is what real Americans want and what both candidates propose doing.

So let’s quit bickering, join forces, and make it happen.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; FReeper Editorial; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: america; americafirst; blessingsofliberty; conservativesunite; cruz; elections; gope; hosereh; posterity; reconciliation; trump; uniparty; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 481-482 next last
To: altura; Jim Robinson
Great idea, Jim. I am all in, but I think you struck out with this delusional crowd here.

I guess I'm one of the "delusional" ones. I've never been against Trump for personal reasons even though I've been unimpressed with Trump since I first looked at "The Art Of The Deal" when I was in high school. I'm also not against Trump for emotional reasons although I've chaffed at his personal attacks on Cruz and others. I'm against Trump because of what I perceive to be his humanist, statist, nationalistic and authoritarian worldview as opposed to Cruz's Christian, Constitutional, liberty loving, small government and free-market worldview. I also believe that Trump has a dangerously volatile demeanor that could get us into perilous trouble.

Both men could prove my perceptions and opinions wrong. Cruz could do it in a second by compromising or being co-opted. Trump could do it in about four years if he wins and his record bears good fruit.

I would be in favor of them collaborating to ensure that the GOPe does not steal the nomination. The will of the people must not be violated even if that means Trump is the nominee because he gets the most votes/delegates.

I would heartily join the Trumpsters in looking for a third party candidate (not Cruz or Trump) if the GOPe does manage to steal it.

261 posted on 03/16/2016 3:00:35 PM PDT by Theophilus (Always vote. Always vote your conscience. God wins every election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

From the vast majority of posters I see here on Free Republic, Bernie Sanders would make a more acceptable VP than Ted Cruz.


262 posted on 03/16/2016 3:00:48 PM PDT by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

That’s where you need to try to think as a non-Trump supporter. Cruz never “blamed” Trump for the riot. He blamed the protesters. He then made a broader point, which is very reasonable, that candidates have a responsibility to be careful about not saying things that could contribute to a climate of violent rhetoric, as Trump has done repeatedly.

It’s like when you have a couple of kids, and the older one is always teasing the younger one. Eventually, the younger one punches the older one in the eye. The answer is to tell the younger one “that was wrong” and punish him for it, but you’d be remiss in your duties as a parent if you didn’t tell the older one “and stop teasing him.”


263 posted on 03/16/2016 3:01:02 PM PDT by RightFighter (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thanks For The

264 posted on 03/16/2016 3:01:39 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter
There were a lot of people on this board who said they’d never vote for McCain. That all changed when he picked Palin.

And I swore I'd never do it again. And I couldn't be tempted. I don't have the slightest inclination.

265 posted on 03/16/2016 3:03:14 PM PDT by Theophilus (Always vote. Always vote your conscience. God wins every election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

It’s about COMPROMISE!

And I didn’t sign on for that!


266 posted on 03/16/2016 3:03:57 PM PDT by Guenevere (If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

No possible way. Too late. Trump and his dirty tricks can fight it out on his own.


267 posted on 03/16/2016 3:04:07 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

No, heck no, he!! no.


268 posted on 03/16/2016 3:04:41 PM PDT by sockmonkey (Donald Trump will ban auto-correct with an Executive Order. Go Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

They should team up and fight this BS together. Boehner was out there calling him lucifer today. Ted better wake up.


269 posted on 03/16/2016 3:07:12 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey; Jim Robinson

No, heck no, he!! no.


DITTO!!

cRuz brings nothing to the table.


270 posted on 03/16/2016 3:07:58 PM PDT by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

You don’t think our Founding Father compromised with each other?

It’s about uniting to stop the planned GOPe treachery at the convention and about defeating the godless Marxist democrats in the general.

It’s about securing the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity!


271 posted on 03/16/2016 3:09:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

No, they can’t technically pool their delegates.

Cruz can though, issue a statement saying he is (1) dropping out of the race for president (which frees his delegates to vote for anyone) and (2) say he wants all of his former delegates to vote for Trump.

They will probably go into the convention with over 80% of the delegates between them. For grins, let’s say Trump has 45% and Cruz 35%. Trump’s 45% are bound on the first ballot. That means they only need enough of Curz’s delegates to go along with the plan to add 5% + 1 to Trump’s totals to secure the nomination.

I’m not sure how loyal Cruz’s delegates are to Cruz. But I suspect there will be enough delegates loyal to Cruz (over the party machinery) to make the plan work.

And, the plan will be out in the open. Vote for Trump to ensure a Trump/Cruz ticket vs a non-Trump/non-Cruz ticket.


272 posted on 03/16/2016 3:10:46 PM PDT by Brookhaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

I don’t care who Trump would put on his ticket. Just having him at the top is enough to turn off enough people that it goes nowhere.


273 posted on 03/16/2016 3:12:12 PM PDT by mak5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: austingirl
Looks like more Cruz supporters are for this idea than Trump supporters given the comments.

Maybe it's because the Trump is clearly winning.

But I'm a Cruz supporter that is glad most Trumpsters are against it because it's unprincipled and they don't need each other except in one respect that requires no quid-pro-quo: deny the GOPe the nomination. Which ever, of the two, gets the most votes/delegates should get the nomination and the other candidate should support that determination on principle NOT as a deal.

If Trump can get all the disillusioned Democrats he says he can get in the general, then he does not need the principled Cruz conservatives and I hope Cruz does not think he has us to offer because it's a no-go.

274 posted on 03/16/2016 3:12:23 PM PDT by Theophilus (Always vote. Always vote your conscience. God wins every election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Should Trump and Cruz unite with we the people against the establishment uni-party?

Fine with me (but stabby the clown has to go first)

An added plus would be screams of anguish from the likes of mitt.
275 posted on 03/16/2016 3:13:48 PM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Yes! It would be by far the best scenario in my view.

Not only for now but looking down the road to get the country on the right track and drive a stake through the heart of the GOPe.


276 posted on 03/16/2016 3:13:50 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

This would be perfectly fine with me. If it helps lead to victory. It certainly gives them Texas and that is Yuge !!


277 posted on 03/16/2016 3:15:38 PM PDT by Chuzzlewit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
works for me
278 posted on 03/16/2016 3:16:25 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Yeah, but door still open to other things for Cruz.


279 posted on 03/16/2016 3:18:58 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
The biggest plus is a Trump/Cruz ticket would immediately secure the nomination for us (the majority of the right-leaning grassroots voters), end any possibility of a GOPe betrayal at the convention

**********************

I have to agree, Jim. We have to do what's best for our country, regardless of our desire for the perfect candidates. Sometimes, being a patriot means recognizing that our own personal feelings may be leading us away from the bigger picture and the ability to accurately see what must be done. We can't lose sight now.

280 posted on 03/16/2016 3:19:40 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 481-482 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson