Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: revivaljoe
This will be the nail in the GOPe coffin.
2 posted on
03/16/2016 9:48:42 AM PDT by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: revivaljoe
I have doubts about this.
.
3 posted on
03/16/2016 9:49:00 AM PDT by
Mears
To: revivaljoe
Reagan/Bush all over again. I can tell you that I firmly believe Trump will never get over the things Cruz has said about him.
To: revivaljoe
IS this a real trust worthy source?.......................
5 posted on
03/16/2016 9:49:18 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(The Left doesn't like him and the Right doesn't like him, so he must be the right guy for the job...)
To: revivaljoe
No. Cruz doesn’t bring the votes needed. Supreme Court would be better, provided he doesn’t get Borked.
6 posted on
03/16/2016 9:49:21 AM PDT by
CASchack
To: revivaljoe
I would love that, but I don’t believe it...
7 posted on
03/16/2016 9:49:21 AM PDT by
Wpin
("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
To: revivaljoe
Oh man. This can end it.
I want to see if this gets any traction today.
To: revivaljoe
Wait, what?
An hour ago anyone who suggested such an arrangement was a carpetbagger, an infidel to this cause, and/or needed meds...
9 posted on
03/16/2016 9:49:54 AM PDT by
BlueNgold
(May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
To: revivaljoe
Oh, this is gonna leave a mark.
10 posted on
03/16/2016 9:49:58 AM PDT by
kempster
(o)
To: revivaljoe
Oh, crap. VP has no influence or power over anything.
11 posted on
03/16/2016 9:50:02 AM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: revivaljoe
I hope Cruz brought his kneepads and chapstick
To: revivaljoe
Noooo! Rafael is ineligible to be VP! Dont do it Donald!!!!
To: revivaljoe
Very interesting. But Trump might benefit more with a dynamic woman. Sorry Ted, how about attorney general?
14 posted on
03/16/2016 9:50:16 AM PDT by
Awgie
(truth is always stranger than fiction)
To: revivaljoe
If I were Cruz, not sure why I would take the job unless it had serious policy decision-making responsibility.
I’m not against Trump, but Cruz is the brightest conservative mind and scholar of the bunch. It would a waste to have him be a political functionary like a lot of VP’s
15 posted on
03/16/2016 9:50:34 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: revivaljoe
I’d rather have Cruz on SCOTUS. A solid, predictable, conservative vote for decades.
And we wouldn’t have to listen to him talk any more.
16 posted on
03/16/2016 9:50:35 AM PDT by
Jedidah
To: revivaljoe
If it happens, the way is clear for Trump to romp to the nomination because Kasickness is a non-factor.
The OH is far too liberal for the GOP.
17 posted on
03/16/2016 9:50:45 AM PDT by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: revivaljoe
HOPING IT IS TRUE!
TRUMP+CRUZ, CAN’T LOSE!
TRUMP+CRUZ, CAN’T LOSE!
TRUMP+CRUZ, CAN’T LOSE!
20 posted on
03/16/2016 9:50:53 AM PDT by
old-ager
To: revivaljoe
Trump’s achilles heel is with working women and maybe more mainstream suburban voters. Cruz does nothing for that- in fact he is scarier than Trump. \
Cruz brings nothing to the table
To: revivaljoe; RitaOK
22 posted on
03/16/2016 9:51:17 AM PDT by
Miss Didi
("After all...tomorrow is another day." Scarlett O'Hara, Gone with the Wind)
To: revivaljoe
Senator Cruz in exchange for his support is wanting to be named to the Supreme Court if an opening occurs while Mr. Trump is president. Mr. Trump does not see this as an issue and a small price to pay to bring Sen. Cruz his fundraisers, donors and staff on boardBS
25 posted on
03/16/2016 9:51:47 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-130 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson