Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House says Obama ‘regrets’ filibuster against Alito nomination in 2006
The Washington Times ^ | February 17, 2017 | Dave Boyer

Posted on 02/17/2016 11:08:57 AM PST by jazusamo

The White House said Wednesday that President Obama "regrets" his filibuster against Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito in 2006, but insisted the situation was different than Republicans' current vow to block any nominee to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

"These are two different things," said White House press secretary Josh Earnest. "The president's objections to then-President Bush's nominee were based in substance."

In 2006, then-Sen. Obama and 23 other Democrats -- including Hillary Clinton -- tried to filibuster Justice Alito's nomination. He was confirmed for the high court anyway.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alito; antoninscalia; democrats; earnest; filibuster; hypocrite; joshearnest; joshnotearnest; justicescalia; obama; obamaliar; scotus; ussc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
Well of course hypocrite 0bama regrets his filibuster now, the shoe's on the other foot.
1 posted on 02/17/2016 11:08:57 AM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Isn’t THAT conveeenient.


2 posted on 02/17/2016 11:10:37 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Filthy hypocrites always say “it’s not the same.” They want it both ways - normal rules don’t apply to them.


3 posted on 02/17/2016 11:11:08 AM PST by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Well of course hypocrite 0bama regrets his filibuster now, the shoe’s on the other foot.”

I guess voting “Present” was not an option for the Jug Eared Marxist. Shame. His desperate try to avoid a voting record ruined.


4 posted on 02/17/2016 11:11:09 AM PST by jessduntno (Steady, Reliable, and (for now) Republican - Donald Trump (D, R, I, D, R, I, R - NEW YORK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I am substantially against everything Barry does.


5 posted on 02/17/2016 11:11:42 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

What is that old saying about “get a taste of your own medicine”?


6 posted on 02/17/2016 11:12:38 AM PST by CivilWarBrewing (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Republicans might cave since they have done so on everything the last 7 years.
I often wonder what it is some Democrats are holding over the heads of certain republicans?
We all wonder what is being held over Justice Robert’s head?


7 posted on 02/17/2016 11:12:45 AM PST by A CA Guy (Are God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Yep, what goes around comes around, buster. Liberals don’t think past their noses. But, it is not tit for tat actually in this case it is the future of our country! And, that means NO LIBERAL supreme court judges. The fight is just beginning!!!!!


8 posted on 02/17/2016 11:12:53 AM PST by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

He also said one of his biggest failures is the divisive tone in Washington and the US. Not skipping Scalia’s funeral would be a good opportunity for him to reverse that. But he’s already announced he won’t attend.

I hope the Senate Republicans see this as disrespect to one of the greatest legal minds in US history and block his appointments, if not just tell him they will wait for the next President.


9 posted on 02/17/2016 11:13:29 AM PST by Vic S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

LOL

WAKE UP GOP

Just use the video’s etc of the Dems stopping the GOP nominee’s and their case is mute.

Then, make the election a referendum on the SCOTUS - Freedom OR Hillary.


10 posted on 02/17/2016 11:13:42 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Bam-Bam is a stinking liar ...


11 posted on 02/17/2016 11:14:28 AM PST by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I bet he does. Now.


12 posted on 02/17/2016 11:14:35 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Josh Earnest. "The president's objections to then-President Bush's nominee were based in substance."

Only Liberal positions are based on substance - this is a crock - the GOP should pay for TV commercials showing Obama stopping Alito.

13 posted on 02/17/2016 11:14:50 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Tough titty said the kitty. What comes around goes around.

Republicans better not screw this one up or they’ll find themselves in the minority come election day.


14 posted on 02/17/2016 11:15:26 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Yeah. “It’s OK when we do it but not when anyone else does.” Right.


15 posted on 02/17/2016 11:16:06 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"The president's objections to then-President Bush's nominee were based in substance."

Well, Bovine Feces is a substance too I suppose.

16 posted on 02/17/2016 11:16:26 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"The White House said Wednesday that President Obama "regrets" his filibuster against Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito in 2006, but insisted the situation was different than Republicans' current vow to block any nominee to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia. "

You cant even make this $hit up.
17 posted on 02/17/2016 11:16:42 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vic S

Hopefully somebody told Obama he could come to the funeral, but he needs to just sit in the back, sucking on a Slurpee.


18 posted on 02/17/2016 11:16:46 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Yep, but it’s exactly the same, 0bama can only nominate one person at a time and the Senate has to consider that nominee only.


19 posted on 02/17/2016 11:17:13 AM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

He sure was stumbling and fumbling when that reporter asked him about this yesterday.

Hope the guy enjoys his next nine years of IRS audits.


20 posted on 02/17/2016 11:17:15 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson