Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Trump Say He Supports a Woman's Right to Choose in the Debates? (Vanity)
February 15, 2016 | Yashcheritsiy

Posted on 02/15/2016 1:44:09 PM PST by Yashcheritsiy

I did not see the most recent debates, and my in laws swear up and down that Trump SPECIFICALLY said that he supports a "woman's right to do what she wants with her own body," i.e. abortion, thus meaning he's not pro-life any any sense of the term.

Is this true?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: vanity; willthemudstick; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

1 posted on 02/15/2016 1:44:09 PM PST by Yashcheritsiy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

If you haven’t seen it 417 times here yet, I’d say it’s not true.


2 posted on 02/15/2016 1:45:59 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

Women’s right to choose what? A flavor of ice cream?

But seriously, no he didn’t.


3 posted on 02/15/2016 1:46:19 PM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

Where do you people get this crap?


4 posted on 02/15/2016 1:46:21 PM PST by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

He said he supported Planned Parenthood because it does “all sorts of good things besides abortion.”

Of course, his support is based on a factual mistake, in that Planned Parenthood doesn’t really do much beyond give lip service to anything. All it really does is perform abortions.

But Trump is not one to let facts influence his positions.


5 posted on 02/15/2016 1:46:56 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag Fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

IATZ (AFTER)


6 posted on 02/15/2016 1:48:00 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

I sure didn’t hear that when I was watching.

And I was following the live thread at the same time and I would think that some FReeper would have caught it at the time.

But that’s just me. Things were moving pretty fast at the debate and on here.


7 posted on 02/15/2016 1:48:22 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

No, he didn’t. But this is only Monday and he’s not yet the nominee. Give him time. He’ll eventually circle back to his original beliefs as a pro-abort.


8 posted on 02/15/2016 1:48:44 PM PST by ru4liberty (I wish FR were still "The Premiere *CONSERVATIVE* Site on the Net" :'(.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy
Trump said he supported women's health.

In line with the belief of many people, Trump said that if Planned Parenthood works for women's health, then they should continue to do that. He supports PP to that extent.
Trump is clearly running this year on the position that abortion is wrong.

Now, I believe that PP does nothing for women's health. Trump's support for Planned Parenthood is contingent on the health issue. Trump has made no indication that he would support Planned Parenthood as a provider of abortions.

9 posted on 02/15/2016 1:48:45 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking but I know what I am thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
But Trump is not one to let facts influence his positions.

Then you should be for Trump, he said the abortions would not be federally funded ergo if what you say is true.....PP ceases to exists.

10 posted on 02/15/2016 1:48:57 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron ("Medicine is the keystone in the arch of Socialism" Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

What you conveniently left out, was that Trump categorically stated he wants to defund the abortion part of Planned Parenthood.

Most breathing humans would take that to mean he will essentially defund Planned parenthood when it finds that out.

Of course the Crewz think it means that Trump will fund everything because it gave out an aspiring in 2009.

Why error on the side of sanity, when you can follow Cruz over the cliff.


11 posted on 02/15/2016 1:49:38 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

Having watched it all, no it’s not true. Might I suggest hearing aids for your in-laws, lol.


12 posted on 02/15/2016 1:49:57 PM PST by flaglady47 (TRUMP ROCKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

NO....ABSOLUTELY NOT!


13 posted on 02/15/2016 1:51:19 PM PST by Guenevere (If.the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham
Where do you people get this crap?

Because they listen to desperate candidates who are quick to lie or distort.

I don't blame the poster, but clearly an attack of lies has found purchase in some quarters.

14 posted on 02/15/2016 1:52:07 PM PST by TontoKowalski (Satisfied Customer #291)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
But Trump is not one to let facts influence his positions.

There you go, you and Trump have that in common.
15 posted on 02/15/2016 1:52:17 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - DC Values)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

This thread should be pulled. Having a topic like this is no different than someone opening up a thread saying:

“IS IT TRUE TED CRUZ ROBBED A BANK IN HIS UNDERWEAR?”

Garbage.


16 posted on 02/15/2016 1:52:36 PM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham

According to them, they swear they both heard him say it specifically.

I didn’t see the debates and haven’t watched them on Youtube yet, so I can’t say one way or the other.


17 posted on 02/15/2016 1:52:39 PM PST by Yashcheritsiy (You can't have a constitution without a country to go with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

Let me be clear—I am pro-life. I support that position with exceptions allowed for rape, incest or the life of the mother being at risk. I did not always hold this position, but I had a significant personal experience that brought the precious gift of life into perspective for me. My story is well documented, so I will not retell it here. However, what I will do with the remaining space is express my feelings about life, and the culture of life, as we approach the 43nd anniversary of the Roe v. Wade.

I build things. There is a process involved in building things. We tap into a lot of disciplines with engineering being one of the most important. The rules for putting structures together are as strict as are the rules of physics. These rules have stood the test of time and have become the path to putting together structures that endure and are beautiful. America, when it is at its best, follows a set of rules that have worked since our founding. One of those rules is that we, as Americans, revere life and have done so since our Founders made it the first, and most important, of our “unalienable” rights.

Over time, our culture of life in this country has started sliding toward a culture of death. Perhaps the most significant piece of evidence to support this assertion is that since Roe v. Wade was decided by the Supreme Count 43 years ago over 50 million Americans never had the chance to enjoy the opportunities offered by this country. They never had the chance to become doctors, musicians, farmers, teachers, husbands, fathers, sons or daughters. They never had the chance to enrich the culture of this nation or to bring their skills, lives, loves or passions into the fabric of country. They are missing, and they are missed.

The Supreme Court in 1973 based their decision on imagining rights and liberties in the Constitution that are nowhere to be found. Even if we take the court at its word, that abortion is a matter of privacy, we should then extend the argument to the logical conclusion that private funds, then, should subsidize this choice rather than the half billion dollars given to abortion providers every year by Congress. Public funding of abortion providers is an insult to people of conscience at the least and an affront to good governance at best.

If using taxpayer money to facilitate our slide to a culture of death was not enough, the 1973 decision became a landmark decision demonstrating the utter contempt the court had for federalism and the 10th Amendment. Roe v. Wade gave the court an excuse to dismantle the decisions of state legislatures and the votes of the people. This is a pattern that the court has repeated over and over again since that decision. Perhaps Roe v. Wade became yet another incidence of disconnect between the people and their government.

We are in the middle of a presidential political cycle and votes will be cast in just days. The citizens of this nation will have the chance to vote for candidates that are aligned with their individual worldviews. It is my hope that they will choose the builder, the man who has the ability to imagine the greatness of this nation. The next President must follow those principles that work best and that reinforce the reverence Americans hold for life. A culture of life is too important to let slip away for convenience or political correctness. It is by preserving our culture of life that we will Make America Great Again.


18 posted on 02/15/2016 1:52:46 PM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip
Proves 1 Thing

Cruz lies

19 posted on 02/15/2016 1:53:17 PM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pravious
“IS IT TRUE TED CRUZ ROBBED A BANK IN HIS UNDERWEAR?”

Well....is it?

20 posted on 02/15/2016 1:54:27 PM PST by Yashcheritsiy (You can't have a constitution without a country to go with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson