Skip to comments.
Company tracked Iowa caucusgoers’ phones
USA Today
| 2/8/2016
| Donovan Slack
Posted on 02/08/2016 11:20:11 AM PST by iowamark
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: DrewsDad
Bulk data collection for counter-terrorism purposes is A LOT different than using it for profiling voters....
To: HamiltonJay
Actually, that’s not true.
I installed apps on my phone for my own use.
You do grasp the difference right?
42
posted on
02/08/2016 1:21:07 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
To: ObozoMustGo2012
You implied a link to the Cruz campaign for the phone data collection mentioned in the article.
Where is the link?
43
posted on
02/08/2016 1:28:22 PM PST
by
DrewsDad
(Choose Cruz - The Consistent Constitutional Conservative)
To: DoughtyOne; Grampa Dave; iowamark; ASA Vet; SubMareener; Liz; AuntB
All of the things we believed about Cruz months ago are proving to be true. What a shocker! : )
44
posted on
02/08/2016 1:41:20 PM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
To: stephenjohnbanker
45
posted on
02/08/2016 1:47:28 PM PST
by
AuntB
(Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
To: iowamark; Old Sarge; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; freeangel; kalee; TWhiteBear; ...
*
**
Company tracked Iowa caucusgoers' phones,
Article, and # 8 .
46
posted on
02/08/2016 1:52:35 PM PST
by
LucyT
To: stephenjohnbanker
LOL
Well, I wish I could disagree.
47
posted on
02/08/2016 1:54:05 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
To: DoughtyOne
Odd that this article mentions the (higher) turn outs as they related to (presumed) Rubio or CRuz or Hitlery or Sanders voters....and that they fail to mention the precincts/or the SECOND highest delegate earner, Trump.
48
posted on
02/08/2016 1:54:22 PM PST
by
Jane Long
(Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
To: AuntB
49
posted on
02/08/2016 1:55:26 PM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
To: Jane Long
Make you wonder who really wrote the press release.
50
posted on
02/08/2016 1:56:28 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
To: stephenjohnbanker
51
posted on
02/08/2016 1:56:29 PM PST
by
Jane Long
(Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
To: LucyT
Scientifically inexact. The company could not tell how individual caucus goers came down by candidate but could determine, in counties decisively ‘won’ by certain candidates, the dominant online behaviors of attendees.
This is not new.
52
posted on
02/08/2016 2:01:21 PM PST
by
caww
To: morphing libertarian
Tracking cell phones and intercepting their calls are two very different things.
As a practical matter, intercepting cell phone calls does not require a warrant. Cell phones are two way radios and anyone can with the right equipment can listen in.
53
posted on
02/08/2016 2:08:12 PM PST
by
iowamark
(I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
To: Jane Long; DoughtyOne; Grampa Dave; iowamark; ASA Vet; SubMareener; Liz; AuntB; All
This is a very short thread, but anyone who reads it, and is still for Cruz is NOT a conservative. I wrote Cruz off last spring when I did some careful research. I don’t know why so few FReepers fail to do their own research, when every candidate has an easily traceable history. Also, it is easy to find out who OWNS every candidate.
Tip O the Hat to Liz, Doughty One and Aunt B.
54
posted on
02/08/2016 2:08:35 PM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
To: DoughtyOne
55
posted on
02/08/2016 2:10:11 PM PST
by
Jane Long
(Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
To: stephenjohnbanker
56
posted on
02/08/2016 2:35:17 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
To: Marie Antoinette
Looks like they could determine users—based on some of their data....
1984 anyone?
To: RummyChick
Keep in mind throughout this election that a former Director of CIA and NSA works for Chad Sweetâs company and Chad was in the Clandestine Arm of the CIA.
Who is Chad Sweet?
To: MayflowerMadam
Seriously? Can you provide a brief summary—don’t know if those shows are available...wish I had seen it!!!
To: anymouse
Not sure what you are trying to say here, seriously??? What are you saying?!?!
BTW,Trump is ahead of everyone double digits in New Hampshire :)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson