Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Illinois and New Hampshire Agree Cruz Is A Natural Born Citizen
American Thinker ^ | February 5, 2016 | Daniel John Sobieski

Posted on 02/05/2016 6:38:54 AM PST by raptor22

Donald Trump, his aura of invincibility shattered by Iowa caucus voters he once called “stupid,” is throwing a tantrum these days, convinced that Ted Cruz “cheated” and continues to maintain the untenable proposition that in any event he is a not eligible to be President of the United States.

Cruz did not cheat in Iowa. Cruz supporters may have indeed cited to supporters of Dr. Ben Carson CNN news reports and tweets that Carson was skipping New Hampshire and South Carolina, so draw your own conclusions, but where were the Carson president captains to shepherd their flock?

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: amthinker; bencarson; citizen; cruz; cruz2016; cruzcrew; donaldtrump; dumptrump; eligibility; iowacaucus; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; nevertrump; tedcruz; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: WorksinKOP
I work in the argument department.

"SHUT YOUR FESTERING GOB, YOU TIT! YOUR TYPE MAKES ME PUKE! YOU VACUOUS TOFFEE-NOSED MALODOROUS PERVERT!!!"

61 posted on 02/05/2016 9:32:40 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: WorksinKOP
-- The other day Rush said "a court had ruled"! In Ill. My head was about to bust. --

Anytime a pundit claims a certain decision says "whatever," they are wrong. The reality of what the courts are doing is above the heads of public, so the public is fed some BS that serves the larger purpose of painting a false reality and preventing a restive public.

I know this because I look at the court filings and so forth, and never, not once in hundreds of times, was the press story correct.

62 posted on 02/05/2016 9:33:31 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: WorksinKOP

No time Toulouse.


63 posted on 02/05/2016 9:52:32 AM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: PJBankard

How did I get on this ping list?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

It seems you don’t have to “join” a ping list anymore. You exist. Ping, you are on it.


64 posted on 02/05/2016 10:12:46 AM PST by Graybeard58 (Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Ha!! Love it.. Have a great weekend!


65 posted on 02/05/2016 10:14:38 AM PST by WorksinKOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

I’m gonna go out on a limb and guess that thiis won’t mean anything to the black helicopter birther loons.


66 posted on 02/05/2016 10:34:03 AM PST by County Agent Hank Kimball (Trust Fund Donnie Trump thinks "Nuclear Triad" is a death metal trio.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
I agree with your post and your understanding of a "natural born" defined citizen, and I also agree with your take on one aspect of its exclusive underlying psychology.

However, you seem to be saying that Ted Cruz is not a natural born citizen, but you also said: "Ted will make a fabulous Senate Majority Leader."

Is that belief in conflict with itself, given your understanding and the current reality of "Ted Cruz for President"?

If so, how to you rationalize around that conflict to support that belief?

67 posted on 02/05/2016 10:47:23 AM PST by GBA (Here in the matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: GBA

There is no NBC requirement for any position in the government except the Presidency.

Ted’s definitely a citizen. That’s all that’s required.

PS - Obama is not NBC, even if he was born in Honolulu. His daddy was the very definition of a hostile alien.

What does that say about every law and EO he ever signed?


68 posted on 02/05/2016 10:52:52 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
Yes, I know and I agree with you.

In a just world, all would be made right per the instructions we inherited.

Actually, in a just world, none of this would have happened to begin with, so there would be nothing to undo and this conversation would be fictional instead of factual.

As it is, I still have the question and you've only have added to the reasons why I asked.

Maybe that question is best left unanswered for now and just considered rhetorical, instead.

Fwiw, when I first "met" Ted Cruz, when he was just a wannabe Senator to help get elected, I saw him as The Man!

Ted Cruz was the "Anti-obama" who could undo the obama damage and help to set the upside-down world right-side up again.

Wrong! Instead, he's following obama's example!

To be honest, my heart broke when "Ted Cruz for President" blindsided me.

In politics, just like in dating, my infatuation got the better of me once again.

69 posted on 02/05/2016 11:19:56 AM PST by GBA (Here in the matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: GBA

That’s interesting.

Yes, Ted does seem to be letting his ambition get in the way of his principles on the Constitution.

Rationalizing it with strained reasoning (”I’m natural born cuz my mom was an American”) means he’s willing to bend the rules to get where he’s going.

He’s only human.

It would have been better if he had said, “I am a Senator. Imagine that - a son of a Cuban refugee, penniless and pursued by brutal Communists - and here I am a Senator from the State of Texas. Isn’t that incredible?” and let it go at that.

Man’s got to know his limitations as another famous son once said...


70 posted on 02/05/2016 11:51:14 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Agreed.. If you haven’t seen it yet, you may enjoy Bill Whittle’s report entitled “Gaslighting” Youtube.


71 posted on 02/05/2016 12:11:38 PM PST by WorksinKOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GBA
"Wrong! Instead, he's following obama's example! To be honest, my heart broke when "Ted Cruz for President" blindsided me.."

Then I can only imagine how betrayed you must feel by Single-Payer, Wealth-Tax, Assault-Weapons-Ban, "Very Pro-Choice" Trust Fund Donnie Trump!

Hank

72 posted on 02/05/2016 12:27:44 PM PST by County Agent Hank Kimball (Trust Fund Donnie Trump thinks "Nuclear Triad" is a death metal trio.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
Yes, good quote. It is very true and a wise teacher.

It's helpful for choosing correctly when one comes to a crossroads and is facing a "Heaven's choice/Devil's bargain" situation Fate is so very good at.

God fave us free will and never subverts it, but He also tests us as a good Father does with his children.

In a crossroads situation, He gives us the right option in among other options that Satan gets to choose specifically for us.

The Father then delights when we choose wisely!

Or Satan does and the Father is there to forgive us and help us learn how not to repeat our mistake(s).

To me, Fate uniquely set Ted Cruz up at this time and place for something amazing, but also something amazingly challenging to/for many aspects of the inner Ted.

Ted could have chosen to go through hell to save US and he would have earned a hero's gold star, pedestal and place in our history.

Unfortunately, it appears as though Ted or perhaps his ego chose a different path: the obama shortcut.

Oh well...there will be more crossroads for Ted, just like for all of God's kids.

I just hope that he and we always follow the shoulder angel's crossroads directions, instead of the shoulder devil's.

73 posted on 02/05/2016 12:38:08 PM PST by GBA (Here in the matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball
Hi Hank,

I'm not a Trump supporter at this time, just an observer.

All you've posted and implied is bad, no doubt about it!

However, not nearly as bad as violating the oaths I've taken regarding my upholding and defending the Constitution.

That is what I think I would be doing by supporting a candidate who isn't eligible to be POTUS.

Homey don't vote dat.

74 posted on 02/05/2016 12:46:14 PM PST by GBA (Here in the matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

How does Rep. Alan Grayson have standing?


75 posted on 02/05/2016 1:21:50 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (TED CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Mum, is that you? It’s like on FR for Heavens sake!


76 posted on 02/05/2016 3:56:02 PM PST by WorksinKOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

All the Donkeys will have standing if they’re out of office.


77 posted on 02/05/2016 3:57:59 PM PST by WorksinKOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: WorksinKOP

One other observation - if we allow NBC to be foriegn born to only 1 US citizen parent.

This would have made Winston Churchill Eligible to be POTUS as his mother was a US citizen at time of his birth in England.


78 posted on 02/06/2016 8:08:26 AM PST by prodogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: prodogs

Well, thats my point. I wish to add.
Decisions are not made in a box. (well should not be made as so) There are always unintended consequences. One must think in a more lineal term. How does this idea impact a longer term?? How will immigration handle this?? I’m not anti-immigration. I’m not anti-cruz. I usually Lurk, therefore I am... But this is getting out of hand. Either we have Laws, or , well, we don’t.
Best wishes to all the passionate participants in this election. Just say no to BIG Gov’t..............


79 posted on 02/06/2016 8:57:55 AM PST by WorksinKOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: WorksinKOP

not sure why my initial post got censored
but here are several great resources which make a compelling case for our founders intentions on NBC being born in USA to 2 citizen parents
->

There is SIGNIFICANT evidence to indicate that the “Founders Intention of “Natural Born Citizen” was to be defined as A child born in the USA to parents who where US Citizens.
Here are significant signs

1. Alexander Hamilton original draft of article indicated that anyone “born a citizen” was eligible - this was changed to only “Natural Born Citizens”
2. It is well known that the founders used the book from Emerich de Vattel “Law of Nations”. There is precedence in using this book to understand the founders intentions. In this book NBC is defined as born on sovereign soil to parents who are citizens
3. The author of the 14th amendment which defined Naturalization “John Bingham” defined in his congressional notes “Natural Born Citizen” in his definition he defines NBC as a child born on sovereign soil to 2 parent citizens
4. There are several SCOTUS cases which mention Natural Born Citizen each of these cases “reaffirms” child born on sovriegn soil with 2 parent citizens

In Perkins v. Elg (1939), the Court regarded Miss Elg as a natural born citizen. She was born in the US. Her father was a naturalized US citizen. Her mother was a US citizen by marriage.

In Kwock Jan Fat v. White (1920), the Court referred to the plaintiff as a natural born citizen. He was born in the US. His father was a native-born US citizen. His mother was a US citizen by marriage.

In U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), Justice Gray cited an article, by Horace Binney, which used the term “natural born” in reference to the US-born child of a citizen but not the US-born child of an alien. In Binney’s opinion, both children were US citizens, but only the child of a citizen was “natural born”.

In Minor v. Happersett (1874), the Supreme Court described two classes of children. Each member of the first class was born in the US, of US-citizen parents. All other US-born children belonged to the second class. The Court used the term “natural born citizen” only in reference to the first class. The Court doubted whether members of the second class were even citizens, let alone natural born citizens.

…it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. (Minor v. Happersett, 1874)

I invite you to review a great analysis on the subject here -> http://people.mags.net/tonchen/FactSheet.htm -
this analysis is comprehensive and ironically was created to dispute Barrack Obama’s eligibility

Therefore there are 2 perspectives you can take
1. Founders Intent - It is clear that the founders intent was child born on US soil to two US Citizens
2. Evolving Constitution - we should allow the constitution to evolve for the times.

ironically , Ted Cruz supports 1. Founders Intent.

Finally, i would ask you to use “common sense”. If you were a founding father would you risk a foreign born child to only 1 naturalized citizen to be eligible for POTUS.
If you would , you would open the door to a child born in Iran to a naturalized student who returned to Iran only to marry a Iranian Citizen who had a child. The child need only return to the USA @ 30 , reside in the USA for 14 years and run for POTUS @ 44. Do you think the founders who have wanted this situation.

Forget the candidates at the moment and focus on the preservation of the constitution. We have seen 1 President who was not NBC destroy our country (Obama). Let us not open the door for a future president who will make the USA a Muslim Nation.

below are great resources which point to NBC being born in USA to 2 citizens

https://t.co/MQ0ihfHZgP
https://t.co/8oFBm9LEhi
https://t.co/WDTevMPdIh
https://t.co/y7KsnfqdUQ
https://t.co/sbVYKLr2NB
https://t.co/ImM9cHoDHf


80 posted on 02/06/2016 11:36:38 AM PST by prodogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson