Posted on 01/31/2016 12:47:03 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
Even by the extraordinary standards of Donald Trump, it was a creepy chat-up line.
We were at 30,000ft on Trump’s private jet flying to Florida, when he showed me his white leather double bed. ‘I like beautiful things,’ he purred seductively. ‘That’s why I like you so much.’
This was just one of many revealing and excruciating moments during the two weeks I spent with Trump in 1995 while making a 60-minute profile of him for ITV – a fortnight which started with a charm offensive, but ended in bitterness, recrimination and intimidating letters that only stopped when I threatened legal action.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
In every manly virtue that counts for a President of the United States, for a Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States, for the Chief Executive Officer of the United States, for a leader of men, Nathan Bedford Forrest is incomparably the superior man.
I support Trump, and I understand what was said. Do you really think I am so stupid that I would support Trump if he started shooting people? Honestly, for the record, do you actually think I am that stupid?
We'll find out soon enough, either during the primary process, or when Hillary starts tearing him to pieces. Schoolyard taunts are not everyone's cup of tea.
As to exposing the liberal media, he's mostly gone after his conservative critics who have accused him of being a liberal at heart who's saying conservative things for political advantage rather than a genuine conservative. A guy who suggested that Oprah might be a good choice for his 2016 running mate isn't likely to be a committed conservative.
Note that campaign promises aren't legal contracts. The moment he wins office, he can do whatever he wants, subject only to the constraints of the office. One look at Obama's moves suggests that you do not want someone in office whose entire record is at odds with what you believe - he can do a lot of harm with executive orders alone, as well as his control of the regulatory agencies.
Actually I do not disagree. That’s kind of the point.
You said...
“I’ve noticed that whenever Trump supporters try to compare Trump to Reagan it’s always to Reagan’s faults.
Trump may have a liberal record, but Reagan once held some liberal positions too. Trump may have switched parties five times and said he identified as more of a Democrat, but Reagan once was a Democrat too. Trump may have been for amnesty, but Reagan was for amnesty too. Trump may have been a serial adulterer and is on his third wife, but Reagan was divorced once too.
Of course they can’t compare Trump’s history to Reagan’s longtime record of promoting conservatism after he left the Democrat party or his two terms as a conservative governor of California.
Trump lacks the conservative credentials to be considered on the same level as Ronald Reagan as a conservative.
He also lacks the personal qualities of being humble, gracious, kind and good natured that Reagan possessed. Reagan was a statesman while Trump is a bully.
So Trump supporters point out Reagan’s flaws to lower him to the level of Trump because they can’t cite Trump’s qualities that would elevate him to the level of Reagan.”
Bingo!!
One of her hairdos in those pics looks like Princess Di’s, maybe that was the attraction back then, IF any of this is true.
I’d vote for ya in a heartbeat; three or four times, too
You obviously have not read or understood what I wrote.
Come early and vote often
John F. Kennedy
I’ll be damned if I’ll pay for a landslide
Old Joe Kennedy
Oooh! The vaunted "I know you are but what am I?" defense!
You prove my point.
Not inane. Ronald was married twice. See, everyone is a line drawer so I guess your line is drawn at two marriages. Just wondering.
LOL!
You were the one needing to ping the boss to shield your virgin eyes.
Never seen that before.
A rare few never make it to third grade.
Special Ed for you.
When uncertain of the future that may await, meet the potential mother-in-law.
Reason and Logic will not sway them, they are captives of the Cult of Personality, and will not relinquish their grip on their fantasy.
SSDE.
But they don't understand why the Liberals adore Obama.
You implied Trump was like Reagan in sexual exploits.....
Being married twice is not a moral failing....
Bedding women while married and then boasting about it in you own books is a moral failing...
I’m still waiting for you to cite Reagans infidelity record...
I think I might be waiting a while....
see post # 133
Of course they can’t compare Trump’s history to Reagan’s longtime record of promoting conservatism after he left the Democrat party or his two terms as a conservative governor of California.
Trump lacks the conservative credentials to be considered on the same level as Ronald Reagan as a conservative.
He also lacks the personal qualities of being humble, gracious, kind and good natured that Reagan possessed. Reagan was a statesman while Trump is a bully.
So Trump supporters point out Reagan’s flaws to lower him to the level of Trump because they can’t cite Trump’s qualities that would elevate him to the level of Reagan.
” a POTUS candidate with one wife”
Did you make that statement or not? I love Reagan, tearing him down is not even the point. You are attacking trump for his sexual escapades, well that’s fine. But, you are a line drawer(we all are). You flavor your arguments with hypocrisy and that is just disingenuous.
I favor Trump for a lot of reasons. His sexual morality is not the reason I am voting for him. I draw my line at forced sexual wrongs outside the marriage.
As of yet I haven’t heard about an some incident where he has told someone to “put some Ice on that”, or use his wealth to make someone sleep with him for a promotion, or date rape drugs, cocaine or the like.
Things have to change. He is the best agent for that change. It’s a revolution of sorts. He has never claimed he was a saint. Trump 2016!
-—You flavor your arguments with hypocrisy and that is just disingenuous.-—
LOL....you are the guy who justified Trump immoral sexual behavior by citing Reagan...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.