Posted on 01/28/2016 4:23:22 AM PST by jimbo123
Donald Trump announced Tuesday that he will not be attending Thursday's Republican presidential debate.
However, Trump's decision may be justified in light of an invitation from Fox News and Google to three carefully selected citizens, who are all prominent personalities on YouTube.
-snip-
The second individual, Dulce Candy, is an immigrant from Mexico, a former U.S. military servicewoman, and a Latina. Trump's commitment to build a wall between the U.S. and Mexico could very well be a topic of her discussions with the candidates.
The third individual, Nabela Noor, is a Muslim American who is an outspoken critic of anyone who, like Trump, questions the motivations of Muslims, Muslim immigrants, Islam, and jihad. Noor, who reportedly equated Trump with Adolf Hitler, will most likely address Muslim-related issues with the candidates. Quite possibly, Noor will question Trump's plan to temporarily close U.S. immigration to Muslims. Noor states she uses her voice to combat what she perceives as negative stereotypes of Muslims, a phenomena she states is more prevalent.
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournalism.com ...
There are no negative stereotypes of Muslims, only accurate ones.
Post 12
Spot on
BS Joe..... I want a man that has a ruthless side to deal with his enemies. You mistake New York Values with the ability to hold and wield power. You apparently value the traits of Jeb
I want a man that understands and uses his power to make America great again.
BTW..... Go Dr Ben
Sympathetic pundits have translated this rant to mean that he wants to temporarily stop Muslim immigration until we get a better vetting process. I strongly support this, but THAT'S NOT WHAT HE SAID. A good debater would welcome questions from people such as the ones mentioned, and bat them out of the park with a good response. A weak debater would run and hide from the debate.
Yep, it appears the whole thing was a complete setup to take down Trump.
Oh. Thanks
I wonder how much coverage this will get today, as it makes Trump’s decision 100% justified, and it exposes Fox’s intent even further.
The crazyed Cruz supporters will still insist that this shouldn’t matter and that our candidate should be able to stand up to this kind of biased moderation.
BS !!!!!!!!!!!!!
When will a Democratic presidential candidate be questioned by some poor white boy with a great sob story who was denied entry into a college solely because he is white?
When will a Democratic presidential candidate be confronted by a welfare queen who lives off the welfare system like a parasite?
When will a Democratic presidential candidate be confronted by the families of the innocent victims of the crimes committed by illegal aliens?
I AM SICK AND TIRED OF THIS BS !!!!!!!!!!!
THIS ............... **** THIS ***** is why I support Trump!!!!!!!!
He forces everyone to address issues which should have been addressed DECADES AGO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!
Trump accuses them of liberal and personal bias.
They change the moderators to 2/3 liberal, proving Trump right.
This from a country where rabies is as prevalent as the common cold
Input from Google, for sure, but with Fox’s acquiescence.
Ah but the absence of the One does more to rebuke the left than standing at a podium parrying “ gotcha” attacks for an hour
That’s not a game played by world leaders, btw
-——acquiescence.——
how about contractual obligation?
This will be a great opportunity for the Republican candidates to tell this Islamist apologist to “go fish”, but couched in diplomatic terms.
But she had better watch her step around Ted Cruz, because he is likely to eviscerate her on national TV. You remember when Brigitte Gabriel just sliced and diced the arrogant Muslim student?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry3NzkAOo3s
I doubt Ted Cruz would be so savage about it, but he could intellectually devastate this Muslim if she tries it on with him.
And the one-world cheap labor welfarians have their seat too.
Any taxpayers working 2 or 3 jobs and being taxed over 50% in total taxes being represented?
Yea, didn't think so.
Good call by Trump again....amazing.
They were invited a long time ago, and they were going to be there to ambush Trump.
We should no longer call presstitute-sponsored candidate forums "debates." They are not debates. Debates occur between participants. When the partisans running the debates get to ambush and argue with the participants and make themselves the center of attention they are not debates, they are waterboarding sessions.
They should all walk over to Trump’s event and tell Box of Rox News where to put their ambush journalism. Then they should boycott them for this tactic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.