Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/17/2016 8:01:33 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: hoosiermama; onyx; Jane Long; V K Lee; conservativejoy; RitaOK; Black Agnes; nopardons; ...

Ping


2 posted on 01/17/2016 8:02:17 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Long is the way and hard, that out of Hell leads up to light - John Milton, Paradise Lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Hmmmm.


3 posted on 01/17/2016 8:03:31 AM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

No standing???tee hee!


4 posted on 01/17/2016 8:04:11 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

do it and get it cleared up so Cruz could be VP


5 posted on 01/17/2016 8:04:53 AM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

It’ll be settled in a court in one way or another. There might be a particularly opportune time politically for Trump to file such a suit.


6 posted on 01/17/2016 8:05:01 AM PST by I Hired Craig Livingstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Was Trump a liar when he said he wouldn’t be the one filing suit or is he a liar now?


7 posted on 01/17/2016 8:05:14 AM PST by FerociousRabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

It appears that Trump, the deal-maker, has made a deal with his good friend Hillary. A lawsuit will be the end of both Cruz and Trump as candidates, enabling JEB! to get the nomination and lose the election. Hail to another Clinton victory!


8 posted on 01/17/2016 8:05:25 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

The courts have demonstrated time and time again that they have no interest in this issue, at least when it was obama’s lack of Constitutional eligibility.

I wonder if they will claim Trump has “no standing” to file suit.


9 posted on 01/17/2016 8:05:26 AM PST by null and void (This war starts in the spiritual realm-it will end in ours though.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Trump is losing his dignity here.


10 posted on 01/17/2016 8:05:39 AM PST by Fernet Branca (#blackdogsmatter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

He remains totally unhinged. Sad.


11 posted on 01/17/2016 8:05:48 AM PST by shankbear (The tree of Liberty appears to be perishing because there are few patriots willing to refresh it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Sorry donald. You don’t have standing.


12 posted on 01/17/2016 8:06:32 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

The NBC thing has been a cloudy issue since Obama started running. There is no clear definition. The language of the Constitution has to be interpreted either this way or that way. No one knows because there has been no explicit ruling.

I’d like this settled. For Obama, for Cruz, for the next guy.

I think a candidate (Trump) has “standing” to demand that a court decide if another candidate can actually hold the office which they are both seeking.


13 posted on 01/17/2016 8:06:33 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking but I know what I am thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

After he had so much success with Obama’s BC. LOL


15 posted on 01/17/2016 8:07:13 AM PST by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Yes! Trump sue! Please do!

Can you say “blow up in your face”?


16 posted on 01/17/2016 8:07:26 AM PST by TBBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Don’t you just love the smell of desperation in the morning?


18 posted on 01/17/2016 8:08:04 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
I'm very much for Trump, but something is really amiss here. What if, and that's a big if, he's trying to get out of the process now and this is his way. He was going along quite swimmingly until the citizenship BS about Cruz started coming up.

IMHO, he needs to drop this BS now!

19 posted on 01/17/2016 8:08:49 AM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

The Trum/Cruz fallout has touched off a nasty civil war on FR, the likes of which I have never seen since I joined.


20 posted on 01/17/2016 8:10:21 AM PST by Rufii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
I watched the GS interview. Tough but fair.

I got the feeling that Trump is really, really disgusted about Cruz not reporting and also obscuring those bank loans. That makes sense. Trump the businessman knows that a reputation for being dependable, honest, and trustworthy in dealings is essential to success. Trump also showed the trait of loyalty. Trump is loyal to his hometown, and Cruz attacking it felt like a personal attack on him.

GS asked the question. DT agreed that he'd have standing, and he didn't discount the possibility of pursuing the eligibility issue. Remember that this when this started Trump was saying Cruz should get the issue definitively answered. It's telling that Cruz didn't do that.

Trump seemed kinder to Rubio in his statements than ever before. I'm wondering if Rubio isn't a better fit for Trump.

21 posted on 01/17/2016 8:10:33 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
Trump is only doing this to help Cruz, don't ya know? /sarc
26 posted on 01/17/2016 8:12:18 AM PST by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

As a person who likes both candidates, it is very disheartening to see the bickering going on not only between the two, but to see that very same bickering here as well. It seems like most of the topics posted lately is of one candidate or camp slamming the other. The only silver lining so far is, the demoncrats are doing the same with their two candidates. I will support whichever of the two is the nominee, but if both are out and we are offered another Bush.....no thanks.


36 posted on 01/17/2016 8:14:57 AM PST by gop4lyf (Gay marriage is neither)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson