Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/14/2016 5:55:12 AM PST by UMCRevMom@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

http://overpassesforamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/obama-frank-marshall-davis.png


2 posted on 01/14/2016 5:55:30 AM PST by UMCRevMom@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

I deeply apologize for forgetting to remove article which creates article extra character distortion


3 posted on 01/14/2016 5:57:59 AM PST by UMCRevMom@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

The second dictator of America after FDR.


4 posted on 01/14/2016 5:58:28 AM PST by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

Ask the British if their actions toward the Colonies was irreversible....


5 posted on 01/14/2016 6:00:07 AM PST by shankbear (The tree of Liberty appears to be perishing because there are few patriots willing to refresh it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

There is no such thing as an “irreversible” executive order. In fact, nothing supports such an order except a vague “moral authority”, or lacking that, power that grows out of the end of a gun barrel, as Chairman Mao would put it.

No matter how some may thunder it, legislation by executive action is not legislation at all, but a threat, real and existential, to the concept of promoting limited government and individual freedom, as it is unrepresentative and the very definition of tyranny. One person, or a small oligarchy, cannot and does not concern himself or itself with even considering or eliciting the opinions of the vast proportion of the population under their influence.


7 posted on 01/14/2016 6:04:48 AM PST by alloysteel (If I considered the consequences of my actions, I would rarely do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

Well, after all of his bluster over executive action on gun control then coming up with his lame announcement of NFA Trust rule making that has been in the works for years, and restating current law regarding who needs an FFL, I’m not exactly quaking in my boots.


8 posted on 01/14/2016 6:05:14 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
"Irreversible" EA's, "irreversible" DOJ appointments...

Do regular people understand that Obama is attempting to take away their God-given and Constitutionally mandated right to choose their leaders, style of government and control their own lives?

9 posted on 01/14/2016 6:11:38 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

Irreversible Executive Actions my ass.

Obama ain’t a king and I’m not a serf.


11 posted on 01/14/2016 6:15:07 AM PST by Arm_Bears (I'll have what the gentleman on the floor is drinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
"Process is your friend, but process also dictates what you can do," McDonough said. "And we do want to make sure that the executive actions we undertake are not left hanging out there, subject to Congress undoing them...

There is nothing Congress can't 'undo'.......................

13 posted on 01/14/2016 6:16:32 AM PST by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
There is no such thing as "irreversible executive actions":

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them . . .

Particularly in the area of our God-given individual right to keep and bear arms, those who approve of tyranny should read more history. One of the precipitating events that made the unpleasantness of 1776 unavoidable was an effort to disarm the people, leading to the Battles of Lexington and Concord. I would prefer to live peaceably, even among America's enemies on the left, but I doubt that decent Americans would tolerate any attempt at widespread or systematic disarmament.

There are irreversible errors. I pray that Obama and his followers will not make that kind of mistake in these final terrible 53 weeks of his regime.

15 posted on 01/14/2016 6:18:01 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

WHERE is our [equivalent of] al Sisi? Where, dammit?


16 posted on 01/14/2016 6:21:42 AM PST by KGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

There is no such thing as an irreversible government action. Ask George III, ask Joe Stalin, ask Benito Mussolini, ask anyone who has ever faced down 80 million armed citizens, angrier than hell.

This nitwit needs to understand that every job, even the job of president, is a temporary job and being fired is not the absolutely worst way to lose one. That’s something else he can discuss with Benito.


17 posted on 01/14/2016 6:22:33 AM PST by muir_redwoods (Freedom isn't free, liberty isn't liberal and you'll never find anything Right on the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

Anything that can be done by executive order can be undone by executive order, the courts or by Congress voting to forbid spending any money on it by federal employees.


18 posted on 01/14/2016 6:23:38 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

Closing Gitmo could be irreversible, and I’m okay with that, even though it’s a mistake. We should be killing terrorists, not keeping them as expensive pets.

Immigration executive actions are completely reversible. Even an unlawful grant of “citizenship” can and should be revoked. Any form of so-called “legal status” for criminals who entered our country illegally can and should also be revoked.

Very little that the traitor in our White House wants to do is irreversible though. The crippling debt that he is imposing on our children is irreversible. The deaths to innocent people murdered by illegals and by terrorists are irreversible. Otherwise, we need to systematically repeal every remaining vestige of these eight terrible years, with most of the executive orders to do so taking effect on January 20, 2017, and all new federal laws and regulations from the past eight years eliminated in a blanket repeal within a week of that date.


19 posted on 01/14/2016 6:24:35 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

There are no ‘irreversible’ executive actions that obama can take before he leaves office. President Trump will be able to cancel them all on his first day in office.


21 posted on 01/14/2016 6:25:27 AM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

When did the WH hire Lurch for chief of staff?

Creepy & kooky, mysterious & spooky, & altogether ooky.....


25 posted on 01/14/2016 6:30:10 AM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

As this White House becomes less and less relevant, they have to jump up and down while shouting, Look at me! Look at me! - My comment is, meh.


29 posted on 01/14/2016 6:33:42 AM PST by r_barton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

The Brown Clown better read Unintended Consequences!


35 posted on 01/14/2016 6:39:15 AM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

Dear Chairman Maobama,

Americans won’t stand for “irreversible”...


36 posted on 01/14/2016 6:51:32 AM PST by G Larry (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

If 0Obama does leave the WH, can we get a Freep ban on the word, ‘notion’.

I really don’t have to explain why.


37 posted on 01/14/2016 6:58:22 AM PST by CincyRichieRich (Freedom is costly; but Marxism takes all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson