Posted on 01/11/2016 8:04:19 PM PST by dvan
Were you aware of this law?
DICK ACT of 1902 - CAN'T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) - Protection Against Tyrannical Government
It would appear that the administration is counting on the fact that the American Citizens don't know this, their rights and the constitution. Don't prove them right.
The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws.
It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
**SPREAD THIS TO EVERYONE **
The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army.
The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.
The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.
The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.
Sources:
http://www.civilrightstaskforce.info/gun_control_forbidden.htm
http://rosieontheright.com/what-is-the-militia-bill-h-r-11654/
Get this message out to all your email contacts. It's time to learn about your rights. Our current President and the Democrats don't seem to worry about breaking laws or the U.S. Constitution.
They do things regardless even if it goes against the Constitution which they swore to abide by when each one of them took office. That itself is an impeachable offense!!!
This is hugh!
No. Natural Laws are unalienable and that includes “gun” Rights, Life Rights (abortion can never be a “Just” Law, and Human Natural Rights—there is no such thing as a Natural Right to sodomize others.
All arbitrary, unnatural, evil “law” is “null and void” . All unjust law (any which does not promote “Virtue” —all the Christian Virtues-—like Wisdom, Justice, Temperance, Courage, Hope, Love— are “null and void”.
All human babies deserve a biological mother and father which is Natural and a Natural Duty to care for them. All Natural Rights have Natural Duties....for “law” to impair any Natural Duty is unjust, evil (dehumanizing) law and is “null and void”.
Natural Law Theory (which includes God’s Design) is the philosophy which is the basis of our Constitution and Justice System. It is unconstitutional to destroy the meaning and intent of our Justice system—which the Leftist’s have flipped upside down so “Up is Down” and “Vice is Virtue”. We have discarded Natural Law like the Marxists for irrational, evil Vice System of Stalin’s which makes us all Slaves to the State which is unconstitutional.
We have a lot of politicians who need to be in prison for treason.
fl
Wickard v. Filburn basically gutted the 10th amendment. ....
Do your own research. Snopes is not a true of false site, but merely a Democrat narrative site. Snopes is not to be trusted and should not be used as a source. This Dick Act may be inaccurate, but the lib/commie couple at Snopes would say it is inaccurate even if it is true.
the only thing referenced as regulated in the 2nd Amendment is the militia. The arms borne by the people are specifically excluded. Read it.
Very true are politicians justices can not read what part of SHALL NOT INFRINGE is so hard to understand.
Such wisdom is rare. Thank you for the post.
I thought this was about Slick Willie...until I saw the date.
:-)
Yes, I know, and that is why I wrote originally "If you don't believe those, check some of the others."
The others all say the same thing (except of course for the ones that are merely parroting the inaccurate meme).
Even Snopes can be right once in a while, by accident, like a stopped clock. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.