Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Once again, sorry for the weird symbols. This is unfortunate. They chose not to come to work, so the company said fine, don't come to work. You're fired.

Now they've caved. Too bad.

1 posted on 01/09/2016 3:50:35 AM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: real saxophonist

They said they could re-apply. They didn’t say they would hire them back.


2 posted on 01/09/2016 3:54:18 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist
Bee up security at that plant. Monitor local mosques. Check phone and social media of local muslims. A frustrated muslim is a likely mass murderer.
3 posted on 01/09/2016 3:56:06 AM PST by Awgie (truth is always stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist

I’m not surprised that the company may hire a lot of these people back. Getting 200 new employees to do that kind of work wasn’t going to be easy.


4 posted on 01/09/2016 3:56:20 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist

Seems to me that CAIR and the writers of the article are misrepresenting what actually happened.

It is my understanding from what I read elsewhere that these Muslims were NOT told they couldn’t pray - the company allowed for that. They all wanted to pray together and the company held that all of them leaving their work stations at the same time would disrupt production.

The article to me implies that company banned their pray altogether.


5 posted on 01/09/2016 3:56:20 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist
Now they've caved. Too bad.

Probably because there are a limited number of people willing to work at the meat packing plant for the wages Cargill is willing to pay.

7 posted on 01/09/2016 3:58:21 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist

How long before Cargill has to recall products?

I guess I will have to research just what I might be buying that comes from that facility to avoid food poisoning.


8 posted on 01/09/2016 3:59:56 AM PST by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist
If Cargill rehires them, no one should buy their products.
11 posted on 01/09/2016 4:02:25 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist

Mass quitting not firing. You don’t show up to work it means you quit.


14 posted on 01/09/2016 4:28:38 AM PST by the_daug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist

I have serious concerns about Jihadists working in the food and beverage industry...color me skeptic. Or better yet, color me Islamiphobic - I am a realist after all.


19 posted on 01/09/2016 4:50:13 AM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist

So don’t buy their products any longer.


20 posted on 01/09/2016 4:54:24 AM PST by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist

OMG...militant Somali Muslims are working in Cargile meat packing plants and have access to our food! Someone should print a list of brands that use this meat. I certainly don’t want it on my table. We became too familiar with the loathsome Somalies in MN.


21 posted on 01/09/2016 4:56:08 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist

‘’Thank-you for re-applying to work. Your application is under consideration for a position on our pork products line.’’


24 posted on 01/09/2016 5:12:22 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist

It should be 30 years, but if these ash holes re-hire these savages they deserve whatever the savages do to them financially and physically.


27 posted on 01/09/2016 5:32:00 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist

Sorry, Mohammed, that position has been filled.

No, Adhmed, we’ve eliminated that position.

Thank you, Saed, we’ll keep your application right here in file 13.


34 posted on 01/09/2016 7:06:24 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist

Watch for the Cargill poisoned meat articles.


35 posted on 01/09/2016 7:12:16 AM PST by Old Yeller (Obama is winning the war on terror when you realize he is on the side of the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist
My understanding regarding religious accommodation in the workplace is that any employer with at least 15 employees is subject to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Whether they should be or not is a whole other topic.

However, the key word is "reasonable accommodation". What I've read of this case, "11 Somali (Muslim) workers in one part of the plant all wanted to pray at once during the second shift. Normally, the company allows only one to three to go at a time during a shift so as not to interfere with meat production."

Cargill allowed prayer breaks and even "has long had two "reflection rooms," where Muslim workers can take short, usually 5-minute, prayer breaks." I wonder if they would provide chapels with Holy Water Fonts for Catholics or separate "reflection rooms" for Jews, Hindus and Pastafarians? /s

Not allowing 11 workers working on the same shift and the same production line to all take a prayer break at the very same time does not seem unreasonable as it would IMO fall under and "would pose an undue hardship" to the company. See numbers 6 through 9:

http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/qanda_religion.html

But the 150 who were fired were not as I understand extended past the 11, nor were they fired for requesting a reasonable accommodation for prayer break(s) nor for complaining over the policy, they just failed to show up for work for three days which is grounds for termination.

Where I work a no-call, no-show for even one day, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as the employee was in an accident or hospitalized and too ill to call off (and yes we even had one who was arrested and in jail for a DUI, but on a weekend when he was not scheduled to work FWIW) is grounds for termination. A no-call, no-show for three days is considered job abandonment and a "voluntary" resignation. We have a policy were anyone terminated for job abandonment is not eligible for re-hire in 30 days or in 180 days but EVER!

39 posted on 01/09/2016 12:45:53 PM PST by MD Expat in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: real saxophonist
Once again, sorry for the weird symbols. This is unfortunate.

Use this:

http://dan.hersam.com/tools/smart-quotes.html

Copy and paste and then "Convert" and paste the converted text. An extra step which should not be necessary but until this is fixed, works great.

40 posted on 01/09/2016 12:48:21 PM PST by MD Expat in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson