Posted on 11/29/2015 4:07:23 PM PST by lowbridge
On the day that a gunman attacked a Colorado Planned Parenthood facility, Mike Adams was in North Carolina.
Yet, Adams, a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington notorious for his anti-abortion and Christian views, was on the receiving end of an inquiry from a fellow professor who wondered about Adams' potential involvement with the shooting suspect.
"Did you correspond with him Mike? Maybe inspire him a bit to complete his mission of murdering a university officer and 2 civilians?" Richard Greenleaf, a sociology and criminal justice professor at Elmhurst College, a private liberal arts school in Illinois, wrote in an email to Adams after the attack.
Greenleaf attached the mugshot of Robert Dear, the suspected gunman who killed three people when he attacked the Colorado Planned Parenthood, to his email. The subject line of the email read, "Another Mike Adams inspired nut case."
According to Adams, the two professors have never actually met, but he has received many emails from Greenleaf in the past. A columnist for Townhall, Adams has even shared one of Greenleaf's unsolicited emails regarding a class syllabus. Adams told TheBlaze that Greenleaf regularly sends him emails to ask about his involvement any time there is a mass shooting or tragedy.
"The fact that a professor would email me repeatedly accusing me of being involved in multiple murder conspiracies is truly mind boggling," Adams told TheBlaze. "The fact that he is a criminal justice professor moves it beyond parody. Greenleaf falls short of any reasonable standard of professional competence. His conduct is simply inexcusable."
Greenleaf told TheBlaze that his inquiries into Adams' involvement with tragedies of this nature stem from his writings at the conservative news site.
"Rhetoric has consequences," Greenleaf simply said.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
Apparently, Geenleaf never misses an opportunity to wet his pants.
Perhaps a defamation of character suit would help Greenleaf tame his tongue.
I think it would DEFINITELY qualify as libel. (unless blogging under your own name makes you a “public figure”)
Yes. :-)
Stalker.
I do not use “terms.” I use words and sentences to form thoughts and ideas. Try it, you might like it.
He could probably find a lawyer to prosecute him in civil court, and it looks like cyberstalking case as well. I would just drive over, tase him, put him into a body bag, hit the skull a few times with a 12 pound sledgehammer, then toss the bag into a random dumpster, incinerate the sledgehammer handle and dispose of the head in a different dumpster, and whistle my way home. Figuratively of course.
Your “thoughts and ideas” are horseshit! Good riddance.
“Rhetoric has consequences,” Greenleaf simply said.
Oh, the irony.
Yes it does, Greenleaf. And the day ain’t all that far off when you and your filthy fellow traveling ilk start receiving the consequences do you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.