Posted on 11/15/2015 3:24:07 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
In a still developing situation, the city of Paris, France, is under attack by terrorists armed with guns and explosives. Many dozens of people have been killed. A still undetermined number of people have been wounded. The terrorists took dozens of hostages in a concert hall. French police and military forces have been deployed. There is mayhem and blood in the streets of Paris.
President Obama has correctly described this dayâs horrific events as âan attack on all of humanity and the universal values we share.â
Terrorism is politically motivated violence against a vulnerable population that is designed to intimidate, sow fear, create panic and alter public policy....
(Excerpt) Read more at salon.com ...
That is why I refuse to click the article and add to his reader count.
This fool needs to get a clue. He not only knows nothing, he doesn’t even suspect anything!
Right - don’t call them out for what they are. They’ll liable to get mad and kill people.
The Saudis don't finance anything but Saudi Arabia. NOW they have a huge investment in peace. NOW those jihadists are anathema to them because they have so much to lose.
They DO have weekly beheadings of murderers and they WOULD have beheaded bin Laden had he dared show his ugly face in the KSA.
Even his family disowned him.
We had a beheading in our neck of the woods over there and MIGHT have witnessed it, if we cared to. I passed on that one. The beheading was for a murderer.
They don't have appellate courts and smart lawyers to call "stays of execution." Once the verdict is handed down, as the Queen of Hearts said: "OFF WITH HIS HEAD!!"
And it was.
Lol.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/saudi/analyses/wahhabism.html
WikiLeaks cables portray Saudi Arabia as a cash machine for terrorists
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/dec/05/wikileaks-cables-saudi-terrorist-funding
I’ll bet he “likes to watch”
From the Internet
WikiLeaks is an international, non-profit, journalistic organisation, that publishes secret information, news leaks, and classified media from anonymous sources.
Its website, initiated in 2006 in Iceland by the organization Sunshine Press, claimed a database of more than 1.2 million documents within a year of its launch.
Julian Assange, an Australian Internet activist, is generally described as its founder, editor-in-chief, and director.
Kristinn Hrafnsson, Joseph Farrell, and Sarah Harrison are the only other publicly known and acknowledged associates of Julian Assange. [Julian Paul Assange is an Australian computer programmer, publisher and journalist. He is known as the editor-in-chief of the website WikiLeaks, which he co-founded in 2006 after an earlier career in hacking and programming.]
Hrafnsson is also a member of Sunshine Press Productions along with Assange, Ingi Ragnar Ingason, and Gavin MacFadyen.
=========================================
Assange sounds to me like a person who would sell his sister for a story. Besides, Wikileaks was only founded eight years ago. The American "awl bidness" in the KSA have been in the business since the 1920's--ALMOST 100 years ago.
As for Assange, that isn't long enough to even be potty-trained.
Also, part of his career, as it says in his bio, was "hacking," which to me is the computer version of "breaking and entering."
Does he sound "trustworthy" or just "in it for the story"??
I don't trust "journalists." Maybe you do.
Only one.
There is no evil, murderous, filthy deed the worst type of human scum on this planet could commit that would compel a leftist to redirect their maniacal hatred for their political opponents.
In fact, such evil murderous deeds always seem to serve as a reason for the average leftist to intensify their hatred for their political opponents.
They are sick demented people.
of course when a white guy kills blacks in church that means leftist can engage in hate rhetoric towards whites by labeling them racists, having racism in their DNA, having white priviledge and labeling any white with a confederate flag racist...but hey nots let label muslim terrorists as muslim cause that’s hate rhetoric!!!!
The Saudis have funded Islamic extremists as a payoff for their own security since the days Mecca was captured by Islamic terrorist in the 1970s.
God bless you and yours, afip.
;o)
Why doesn’t Salon just go ahead and incorporate a hammer and sickle into their logo?
George Soros is behind Salon. Soros may be the most evil man in the world..pure evil
What is worse - “Hate Speech” or..
Hearing the unique sound of an AK-74 on rapid fire, hearing the sound of a round hitting human flesh near by, looking over and seeing your child with her half her head blown away and finally looking up into the smoking muzzle of the AK just before it....
One might hurt someone’s feelings and the other ends your world. Which is worse?
Well, let's just look.
From your source article:
In the United States, the right-wing media and movement conservatives have for decades consistently used eliminationist and other violent rhetoric to describe liberals, progressives and other people with whom they disagree. As was seen in the recent attacks on a Charleston-area black church, and other violence by right-wing anti-government militias, such rhetoric does not float in the ether of the public discourse, harmless and unacknowledged. No, it does in fact lead to action.
[Emphasis supplied]
Anybody know any "movement conservatives" using "eliminationist" speech to advocate wining out the libs, killing them all?
Is anyone in here talking about mass executions of liberals and Communists, concentration camps as a preliminary to killing mass numbers of them? Destructive-labor camps? Anything like that?
Anyone in here? How about it, FReepers? Moderators? Sidebar? Guys?
I think dear Chauncey is confessing his daydreams.
“Anyone in here? How about it, FReepers? Moderators? Sidebar? Guys?”
Can’t answer now——too busy tallying my weekend kills.:-)
.
My apology for having given him a click so I could quote him "in excremento" for purposes of exposition.
Evil guns make evil people, eviller.
You know the shtick.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.