Posted on 10/17/2015 6:02:37 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
Front-running GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump would end up "the largest loser of any candidate ever in the history of the country" if he were the party's standard-bearer in 2016, Sen. Rand Paul tells Newsmax TV.
In a no-holds-barred interview with "The Hard Line" host Ed Berliner to air Monday night at 9 p.m. ET, the Kentucky Republican – running well behind Trump in national polls and struggling with fundraising – says the brash billionaire's "attitude" is "so polarizing" that if he were the Republican presidential nominee, "we'd get just swamped in a landslide."
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
staying home is what got us obama
the country’s welfare is more important than youe self esteem
Yeah, we can’t have a candidate that tells it like it is.
“...brash billionaire’s “attitude” is “so polarizing” that if he were the Republican presidential nominee, “we’d get just swamped in a landslide.”
It seems to me that the GOP has elected nominees (McCain and Romney) who were actively campaigning to work with democrats if they became president. McCain even went so far as to tell an old GOP woman that Obama would be a great president and Americans had nothing to fear from him. How’s that for some soothing talk? And yet, those two Republican nominees were still “swamped in a landslide”.
Hey Paul, don’t you think it’s time we try something else?
No, what got us Obama was the GOP’s selling out to the Cheap Labor Express and trying to force people to vote for amnesty.
Run another amnesty candidate and lose again.
And that is from...”The worst possible nominee”
==
Per one over-night thread, Trump is at 33%.
What is the number for Paul? Oh, his was similar. He has a 3 too — he is at 3%.
FR thread: Latest Reuters National Poll – Donald Trump 33%…
bRand apPaulled __Kentucky Fried Chithead of a politician. Like his daddy he’s not very inspiring.
“Do you think they’re going to nominate somebody who implies that most Hispanics are rapists and drug dealers?”
Notice the weasel wording this little weasel uses. He knows that Trump did not SAY the above quote and he uses the subjective “implies” so he can’t be called a bald-faced liar, which is what he is. I hope someone primaries his sorry ass. He can go hold hands with Al Sharpton.
you can rationalize till hell freezes over but still be wrong
...and another one bit the dust....
I think these people that are under 7% are doing to to make Trump look bad...they know they don’t have a chance in heck to win...so they attack Trump knowing that he will take their heads off....but it’s not THEIR faults, it’s Trump’s is the way they get out of the race without losing face...
We are on to you guys, you don’t have the guts to stand up and say, “the people don’t want us so we are bowing out” no they would rather do it the spineless sissy way, so take your toys boys and girl, and go home....your done...
So Trump is polarizing and Sanders is not?
Paul should shut up. He needs to remember he signed a pledge to support Trump.
He should immediately bow out of the race and start supporting Trump/Cruz!
With hindsight, McCain was clearly our worst nominee in history, ushering in Obama.
I was neutral on Rand, but I’ve come to despise the little creep.
Damn, He’s shorter than the rev. al.
And polarization is EXACTLY what we need - but not along conventional lines.
We need to find, fix, and destroy the Uniparty minority ruling us through false polarization, divide Americans from globalists, finish off the GOPe, and rule for 50 years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.