Posted on 09/28/2015 1:13:26 PM PDT by Red Badger
Audi and Skoda say they have a total of 3.3 million cars fitted with the software that allowed parent company Volkswagen to cheat US emissions tests.
Some 2.1 million Audis affected worldwide include 1.42 million in western Europe, with 577,000 in Germany, and almost 13,000 in the US.
Czech-based Skoda said 1.2 million of its cars were involved, but has yet to give a country or model breakdown.
Separately, German prosecutors started a probe against VW's former boss.
Former chief executive Martin Winterkorn will be investigated over "allegations of fraud in the sale of cars with manipulated emissions data," German authorities said on Monday.
The Audi models affected include the A1, A3, A4, A5, A6, TT, Q3 and Q5 models, a spokesman told the Reuters news agency.
(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...
“Audi—this is truthiness in engineering”?
Engineering? yes, Programming? no......................
Darrell Waltrip, 1976
The rest of the world gets: Audi, vorsprung durch technik, ( “Ahead through technology”)
I don’t give a rat’s hindquarters what my diesel emits.
computers with the same evil software.
I would love to buy a bunch of these. And get the software and open aource it so that everyone could upload. Great idea.
If You Ain’t Cheatin’, You Ain’t Tryin....................
Does your car run well?
If it does, what’s the problem?
agreed
Correct. Up until a few years ago, it was almost impossible to engineer a practical HCCI engine; but now, with modern valvetrain design, electronic engine controls and modern pressurized direct fuel injection systems, HCCI is on the very of becoming a viable alternative to diesel (but without the diesel emission issues).
All my newer cars run on pure ethanol. In other words, they run on pure corn-e.
Can someone give a technical explanation of this (numbers are made up for illustration):
1) Car A gets 25 mpg with the “test mode” software running.
2) With “illegal” software changes, same vehicle performs better and gets 30 mpg.
3) There being no free energy lunch, this can only happen via more efficient and complete combustion. That would result in lower hydrocarbon emissions. How exactly is this worse for the environment?
Is the gubment requiring more hydrocarbon emission as a tradeoff for something they have decided is worse? What?
I don’t blame them. The EPA CAFE standards are stupid and arbitrary and is nothing but libearl tyranny.
>>I would guess that diesel-powered Porsches have the same problem.
I doubt it. I think the Porsches only use the 3.0 6-cyl with pee-fluid injection. There isn’t a problem there, as far as I know. The problems are with the 2.0 TDI with the DPF and no urea injection. Porsche doesn’t use anything that small, at least over here.
See my previous post.
I darn sure wouldn’t take it anywhere near a dealer, unless you want an ECU flash the results of which you might not like.
Sounds like the engineers delivered..in all innocence.
What I fear is some bureaucratic move to make the cars illegal. That would be a mistake.
I’ve told a couple of people not to let their cars anywhere near a dealer. You likely don’t want their ECU “update”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.