Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Carson defends his research on aborted fetuses
CNN ^ | 08/14/2015 | Eugene Scott and Cassie Spodak

Posted on 09/10/2015 9:31:19 AM PDT by RoosterRedux

Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson on Thursday defended his past use of tissue from aborted fetuses for medical research even as he continued to criticize Planned Parenthood.

The retired neurosurgeon said his research, which took place in 1992, does not conflict with his call to defund Planned Parenthood after several undercover videos surfaced that purportedly show officials with the organization working with research companies using tissue from aborted fetuses.

Jen Gunter, an obstetrician-gynecologist, wrote on her blog that Carson had co-authored an academic paper published in Hum Pathol, in which he described working with material "from two fetuses aborted in the ninth and 17th week of gestation."

In her blog post, Gunter sharply criticized the GOP presidential candidate.

"As a neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson knows full well that fetal tissue is essential for medical research," wrote Gunter, author of "The Preemie Primer," a guide for parents of premature babies.

"His discipline would have a hard time being where it is today without that kind of work. What is even more egregious than dismissing the multitude of researchers whose work allowed him to become a neurosurgeon is the hypocrisy of actually having done that research himself while spouting off about its supposed worthlessness."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2016election; abortedfetusus; abortion; bencarson; carson; deathpanels; election2016; obamacare; plannedparenthood; stemexpress; trump; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 09/10/2015 9:31:20 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

He just lost any chance he had.


2 posted on 09/10/2015 9:32:16 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Isn’t this the same bunk that Carson already proved to be a falsehood? He did not work with fetal tissue.


3 posted on 09/10/2015 9:32:56 AM PDT by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Undoubtedly, black babies, too.


4 posted on 09/10/2015 9:35:25 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: I'd like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

ALL competent DOCTERs operate on CADAVERS.. always have...

be it ADULT ONES or baby ones..

DID I say ALL DOCTERS.. not some docters.. YES I think I did..


BTW; Docters of Sophistry(all kinds) are not REAL docters.. *as a side note


5 posted on 09/10/2015 9:35:41 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Old news, this was covered weeks ago.


6 posted on 09/10/2015 9:36:42 AM PDT by Paradox (Sayin it like I see it, wherever and whenever I see fit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

It’s CNN BS.

There are no facts or information at all in this.

Nothing. Deceptive headline paired with innuendo and rhetoric.


7 posted on 09/10/2015 9:36:45 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1; ifinnegan; Paradox; hosepipe; miss marmelstein; Gaffer; RoosterRedux

And the answer to my question is a resounding YES!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3324505/posts


8 posted on 09/10/2015 9:40:06 AM PDT by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Yes. CNN, but there is the matter of the paper offered up re: research on two fetuses. Is this true or not? Was he a co-author and did the paper involve aborted fetus research? It’s a simple yes or no type answer if you leave out the politics of campaigning.


9 posted on 09/10/2015 9:40:11 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1

This is old news. What Rooster hopes to gain by rehashing old news in anyone’s guess.


10 posted on 09/10/2015 9:40:25 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
 photo 6174addc-44ee-40cb-b4c1-e91dc316348a_zpsh4rbtb1a.png
11 posted on 09/10/2015 9:41:11 AM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: timestax

Nice logos and generally agree. But all I have are the basic yes or no questions I put in post #9.


12 posted on 09/10/2015 9:42:13 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Do you have the citation?


13 posted on 09/10/2015 9:45:14 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

The truth is that Carson did indeed put his name on this study, which used the cannibalized bodies of murdered babies.

The truth is also that Carson supports the use of the so-called “morning after” pill, which is a chemical weapon of mass destruction designed and intended solely to destroy already-created little kids.

He also supports immoral, unconstitutional legislation that grants permission in the statutes to murder babies, as long as they are killed on schedule and by some set of arbitary man-made rules.

Of course, Donald Trump is no better.


14 posted on 09/10/2015 9:47:54 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Give me a break. The OP made a claim. Paper, research on two fetuses and Carson mentioned. I asked two or three VERY basic questions I wanted an anser to and you come back to me with a “citation?”....... what ‘citation’ ????

I don’t give a crap about Carson really - I don’t think he’ll go beyond the first two primary states, frankly. I was just wanting clarification.


15 posted on 09/10/2015 9:48:20 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Thank you. That’s what I wanted. I seem to remember something about Fox Mulder and whatshername (Scully the Brit woman).....”the truth is out there.”


16 posted on 09/10/2015 9:49:44 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
This article was brought to my attention in the thread that directly precedes this one. My only motive is to post an article that I thought shed light on this issue.

It won't bother me if you ask the mods to pull the thread.

17 posted on 09/10/2015 9:51:10 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. Mahatma Gandhi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Thanks. Good explanation. No need for me to ask the mods.

Appreciate your response.


18 posted on 09/10/2015 9:55:24 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

You don’t understand my question.

What is the article? Provide the reference.

No way anyone should allow MSM to filter information

Provide the citation for the publication in question.


19 posted on 09/10/2015 9:57:32 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

nuthin but rettrick and vitrioil.


20 posted on 09/10/2015 9:58:54 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Spriiingtime for islam, and tyranny. Winter for US and frieeends. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson