Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Food labeling, Hollywood-style
The Washington Times ^ | August 17, 2015 | Joanna Lidback

Posted on 08/18/2015 3:19:34 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The first clue that Gwyneth Paltrow didn’t know what she was talking about on Capitol Hill earlier this month came with the first words she spoke: “I’m here as a mother.”

Apparently, the actress thinks that any mom can show up in Washington and hold a press conference that attracts lawmakers and the media.

Memo to Ms. Paltrow: The rest of us moms don’t have that celebrity power. We haven’t won Oscar awards, assumed glamorous roles in the “Iron Man” movies, or married (let alone divorced) rock stars.

But Ms. Paltrow has done all of these things so, of course, everyone needs to know what she thinks about pending legislation on food-packaging labels. You know, because she’s a regular mom.

Well, I’m a mom and a farmer — so I like to think that I know a little bit about raising kids, crops and dairy cows. And I’m convinced that Ms. Paltrow is completely wrong about food.

She has let herself become a tool for special-interest groups that oppose the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act, which the House passed in July with significant bipartisan support. This sensible bill would prevent states from forcing food producers to put costly and ineffective labels on food that contains genetically modified (GM) ingredients.

“I have the right to know what’s in the food that I feed my family,” said Ms. Paltrow.

True enough; no one is arguing that you don’t have the “right,” except, of course, the group she represented that day in Washington. That’s why packages of food already display information about calories, nutrients and ingredients. Anybody who wants to avoid GM foods enjoys a few good options, including organic food, which doesn’t contain GM ingredients and already carries a special label.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: congress; farming; food; foodlabeling; gmo; gwynethpaltrow; health; labeling; nannystate; nutrition; organic; paltrow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

And I’m convinced that Ms. Paltrow is completely wrong about food.

SHe has been completely wrong on just about everything she has ever bothered to stick her fat ass in.


21 posted on 08/18/2015 4:18:36 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Cookbook. That’s what it was. She got some pretty scathing reviews from what I remember.


22 posted on 08/18/2015 4:24:07 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

It was a disaster! I knew it would be because, despite her miserable father, she came from a Waspy upbringing where brownies were considered outré.


23 posted on 08/18/2015 4:27:14 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: I'd like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson