Posted on 08/09/2015 8:18:45 AM PDT by xzins
Edited on 08/09/2015 8:25:34 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
...this doozy comes from online conservative blogger Eric Erickson of Red State. Do we need any more proof that they are all certifiable? What's up with conservatives and their tweets? The men in white suits should be called in very quickly because he needs a serious 30-day observation period. Don't forget to bring a straitjacket with you.
pourmecoffees posterous finds this tweet for the ages:
Eric Erickson (@ewerickson), Editor-in-Chief of RedState didn't just toss off that gem. He wrote it, then deleted it, then re-wrote and re-sent it adding the proper hashtags ("LMRM" = Let Me Repeat Myself, "TCOT" = Top Conservatives on Twitter, "RS" = RedState). Made sure he got it just right. See for yourself.
Trump, on the other hand, did NOT say what he is accused of. It is pure fabrication.
Trump, in Erickson's case, can certainly tweet "weakness", but it appears he can also tweet "hypocrite."
Trump, on the other hand, did NOT say what he is accused of. It is pure fabrication.
Trump, in Erickson's case, can certainly tweet "weakness", but it appears he can also tweet "hypocrite."
I knew I had seen articles at Red State I did not like, in fact, were a bit on the mean side.
IF EE wrote that above, that is just obnoxious slander.
WHY DOES HE SUB FOR RUSH..?
And he acts all self-righteous about Trump over something Trump NEVER even said.
Ericson has jumped the shark
This is a mere drop in the bucket as far as Erickson’s comments about women
It is fine to be a shock pundit - the Howard Stern of the conservative political blog world
But to try to take the high ground now, by dissing Trump as a misogynist brute over fabricated comments?
Uh. No.
Erickson played the part of the useful idiot. Now watch the RINO Rats scurry away from this clown.
I think his days of filling in for Rush are probably over. The only one he should have in there is Mark Steyn, who’s the most entertaining of the substitutes.
It would be exactly like Howard Stern getting all self-righteous over someone using foul language.
Except that Trump NEVER said what Erickson fabricated Trump as saying.
Looks like Souter dropped the ball in some of his rulings: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Souter , that much looks so, looks like he could have voted on Roe V. Wade being brought up again. That does look bad.
Wasn’t Erickson raised in Dubai?
He wrote the actual words in the Title without all the asterisks
I don’t know, but it would be an interesting factoid.
Ericsson has the idiot part down pat. I am not sure about the useful part though.
“Some Women Believe They Can Have It All, And That’s The Crux Of The Problem”
-Erick Erickson
Go to the above link and do a google. It’s fact.
Erickson wrote it and spelled it out boldly, NOT using asterisks or other symbols to hide the “F” word.
He should have disinvited himself.
Yep, aged 5-15
Wonder if there are any continuing family investments in that part of the world...financial or personal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.