It already is.
Animals do not have rights. They do have welfare though, and are not to be subjected to cruelty.
They became extremists back in the 1960s. I remember adds calling for the banning of hunting, and protection of wildlife. Then it was found those organizations were spending all the donations on high living.
speaking of Watermelons....
The EPA has been called due to a dangerous wreck near Troy, OH. The tanker is full of Whipped Cream!
http://www.whio.com/news/news/tanker-full-of-whipped-cream-crashes-in-troy/nnFf3/
Only wish I had some ice cream!!
I’d say from the very beginning. Animals have no rights.
As soon as they claim that animals have rights.
Animals have protections, granted by humans.
Humans have rights. Some granted by God and some granted by themselves.
“When Does Animal Rights Activism Become Extremism?”
At the instant that one first suspects that the concept of animal rights is anything other than lunacy.
The comments in this article are offensive to people who have experienced actual terrorism--the kind that's motivated by hatred and prejudice. The kind that hurts people and causes suffering. There's nothing "extreme" about compassion. It's just sad that some people have been forced to take "drastic measures" in order to promote kindness and get others to have basic with some common decency.
At conception.
An anti-Belgian bigot, huh? I'll bet he hates Belgian endives!
Much as I detest the animal rights nuts the above, if true, is serious govt overreach. Or simply fascism, if you like.
Leftist nuts and worse. Anti-free enterprise and anti-Const. as to the 2nd Amend. , 10th Amend. a state’s right to deal with all sorts of products, hunting, fishing rights. And all Dems. These people also are on the climate, anti energy groups. The same nuts; the same anti-American.