Posted on 08/01/2015 7:35:03 AM PDT by Kaslin
As a conservative I gave up long ago on balanced television news coverage. But even this jaded viewer has been disappointed by what I consider unfair and inadequate news coverage of Presidential Candidate Ted Cruz. When Cruz first entered the race for a Texas senate seat he instantly became a favorite of tea party crowds. That’s not because Cruz was some fringe lunatic or right wing radical. Its because he instantly displayed world class communication skills that he used masterfully to articulate conservatism. Though it may sound like heresy to some, I would posit that Cruz is better at communicating conservative principles than even…yes I’m going to say it…Ronald Reagan.
However, I have watched many, even in conservative media treat Cruz like either a fringe right winger or an intellectual who doesn’t understand how Washington works. This criticism has gone on since Cruz first came into the Senate but hit a higher gear when he supposedly “shut down the government” in his attempt to defund Obamacare. At that time Cruz was roundly criticized by the aforementioned commentators and accused of everything from showboating to dereliction of duty. In fact Cruz was merely staying true to his promise to actually “do” something about Obamacare. Had he received energetic support from his own leadership, he might have succeeded.
Which leads us to coverage I saw on Monday night. After Cruz stood courageously on the floor of the Senate last Friday against his own Majority Leader for what Cruz says was a breach of trust within the caucus, some media brought out the long knives. Cruz was now accused of rank hypocrisy. This charge was based on Cruz’s promise to avoid Republican on Republican violence. But I had always taken Cruz’s statement to be in regard to criticism of other GOP Presidential Candidates. At last tally, Mitch McConnell had not entered the Presidential race. Conversely, the Senate is supposed to be a deliberative body. So how is Cruz a hypocrite for doing his job as a Senator?
Finally, there is the maddening tendency of media to lump Cruz in with Donald Trump. Some pundits seem to relish the theory that both men are unserious candidates, equally temporary flashes in the pan. The consensus, a mantra repeated in various ways by various media personalities, seems to be that both Trump and Cruz are merely a temporary salve for the disaffected. The pundits have repeatedly set up a false equivalency wherein both men are depicted as unenlightened as to the DC ways, rude, insincere in their motives, and to be taken with an equally tiny grain of salt. In reality, though the two may be friends and may share similar positions on a few issues, they are miles apart when it comes to substance.
While I have gotten as big a kick out of Trump as the next voter, I am not a supporter of his candidacy. Trump specializes in platitudes and generalizations which, while temporarily refreshing in our current political culture, display a lack of depth and reflect a lightweight approach to the root causes of national problems as well as their solutions. Ted Cruz on the other hand, a magna cum laude graduate of Harvard Law, has repeatedly demonstrated world class debating skills, an ability to make a strong, specifics-filled, case for conservative principles on virtually any topic, and the aforementioned communication skills to teach conservatism to the nation. Cruz rarely raises his voice when dispatching an opponent whether in a committee hearing or last week in his articulate take down of the Majority Leader.
For my entire adult life Americans have been crying out for a true statesman cut from a fabric similar to our founders. There are more than a couple of men in the Republican field of candidates that may fit that mold, none more perfectly than Cruz. Though some pundits can’t discern a significant difference in the depth and thoughtfulness between Cruz and Trump, let’s hope the voters can. If Cruz gets adequate time in front of the microphone at this first debate, something tells me he will make that difference clear.
I can relate. My epiphany came during the Carter Administration. Before that I listened to News Radio!!! That is a junkie.My daughter was shocked to learn that I had been that way when she was very small; all her aware years she had known me to treat “the news” as a commercial for a product I wouldn’t accept if you gave it to me. Which is what it is. I still have a TV because there are things I enjoy on it. But
Why Broadcast Journalism is
Unnecessary and Illegitimate
Sure is interesting watching the pieces move around.
Well, Cruz does have to have a running mate.
There, fixed it.
Plus Jeb(!), Krispie Kreme, and Linda Grahamnesty.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
If Cruz and other conservatives had “world class communication skills” they would not be ignored by the media. That they are ignored by the media is objective proof that they lack “world class communication skills”.
Conservatives playing the victim card (victim of the media, victim of RINOs, etc) is a major communication error that proves we lack communication skills.
Case in point, Trump rarely speaks a complete sentence.
Ted Cruz REMAINS the only true Conservative in this race.
~~Cruz, OR LOSE~~
I don’t see the kid gloves towards Bush. He was ripping him yesterday, in fact. On the other hand, Trump hasn’t said a single unkind thing to Cruz. Nor Cruz about him.
They aren’t birds of a feather. One is committed conservative who’s qualified to be President (His name starts with a “C”), the other isn’t.
Okay, so Ted will do his "evolving" later ...
He hasn’t said anything unkind about Carson either.
Trump values loyalty...Cruz has been loyal.
Truth be told, though, Trump really hasn’t taken it to the moderates in the race so far. He MUST target Bush and Rubio...
This just isn't true, as Trump's new book proves.
Trump, in fact, is dealing with the ultimate root cause - the economy. And he has concrete ideas on how to fix it - fast.
Communication skill is the skill to achieve your objective. If you objective is to attract attention that is different than the objective to educate.
Ron Paul/Newt style has always been to educate. They communicate facts and logic to the few.
Obama’s style is the opposite of Ron Paul. Obama wants no part of education. He wants to energize emotions of “love Obama” and “hate the opponent” that have zero to do with what Ron Paul/Newt deal with.
I was surprised Cruz didn’t climb in the polls after nailing the turtle to the wall. He is not resonating with voters for some reason. As for Trump he is running his game plan brilliantly.
I adore Palin but think she’s been too damaged and would hurt Cruz’s chances. I’d like to see a Cruz/Gowdy ticket and for him to put Palin on his cabinet.
Easy one. Nope! Trump is a fake conservative product of the Clintons.
Cruz is a good conservative Trump parodies.
Newt actually does educate Ron titillates.
Ted Cruz Ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.