Posted on 07/28/2015 3:34:16 PM PDT by Kaslin
RUSH: Craig in Scarsdale, New York. Great to have you on the program. Hello, sir.
CALLER: Thank you very much, Rush. I can't believe all these reporters out there who are just dumping on Trump. It's unbelievable. They gotta go back 30 years to find something that can actually stick to this guy.
RUSH: No, no. They have to go back 30 years to make up something.
CALLER: I'm sorry?
RUSH: They had to go back 30 years to make up something.
CALLER: To make up something. And not just that. Why don't we go back 30 years and look at Whitewater and maybe dig up... Oh, I don't mean dig him up. Maybe we could find Vince Foster and he could tell us.
RUSH: You know that's not gonna happen.
Obama: I'm a 'pretty good president,' if I ran for a third term, I think I could win
I had a name, and I decided to self-censor it so you won't hear it. Anyway, the last caller, Craig in Scarsdale, not to be confused with Tarrytown. Scarsdale is where the Tarrytown mob spits their olive pits. This guy is all upset that the media's not giving Hillary the same kind of treatment. What did he just say? You heard me. The fact is, Craig, they've done Whitewater. All of that stuff that you mentioned did come up way back when, and it is now judged that Hillary has survived it, and therefore it's irrelevant.
Plus it was all part of "the vast right-wing conspiracy." But don't get focused on that, Craig, because Hillary's got her own problems out there. Her campaign's imploding, and Drive-Bys don't want to report that, and they're doing everything they can to avoid it. They're pull up short of telling the truth about Hillary and her prospects and her appeal, lack of it. I actually think that what Obama did... I guess he did it today, given the time change. He's still in Africa, right? Ethiopia. Wherever.
Yeah, didn't he look into getting a pyramid built in his honor over there when he left Ethiopia? Maybe I heard that wrong. I thought he was looking into getting pyramid of Cheops, having another one built. Of course, we would need space aliens to do it. So, anyway, Obama... What? (Snort!) Who needs any opposition on the Republican side to beat Hillary? Obama said that he could win a third term. "If I ran, I could win." (laughing) Right as Hillary's trying to establish a candidacy of inevitability!
Hillary's trying to establish a coronation, and here comes the sitting president (impression), "Oh, yeah, I can easily win another term." (laughing) What better way to telegraph that nobody wants the babe? "Nobody wants her! Hell, they'd rather have me." (laughing) Let me translate for you what he means when he says, "I think if I ran I could win." He means: "Hillary couldn't win in '08 against me, and she can't win now against me. The Clintons don't run this party; I do." That's what Obama said at the great pyramid of Cheops, imagining one in his own honor. Where was he when he said this?
He was still in Africa? (interruption) He was addressing the African Union, not to be confused with the European Union, and not to be confused the SEIU union. He's at the African Union. I just think this makes Hillary look even smaller. I mean she's insignificant now, other than the D by her name. I mean, all this excitement for Bernie Sanders. I have story... This is Mark Halperin. Mark Halperin! Not a conservative writer, not a conservative website, not the American Spectator, not National Review, not Dr. Krauthammer, not the Weekly Standard.
t's whatever it is, Bloomberg News. Mark Halperin is part of the duo that writes books about campaigns after the campaigns are over and they've withheld all the damaging stuff for Democrats for their book. "Hillary's Bernie Sanders Problem Is Bigger Than Anyone Realizes -- Seven ways in which the septuagenarian socialist from Vermont actually presents a mortal threat to the Democrat front-runner." Now, he begins the piece in an obligatory fashion with a salute to history. He writes, Hillary "Clinton is, without doubt, still the odds-on favorite to win, with plenty of support, cash, and ballast for the foreseeable future.
"Therefore, it is more germane to ask: What impact might Sanders have on the former secretary of state in the nomination fight? And, if Sanders doesn't win his party's nomination, what impact might he have overall on Clinton's chances of becoming the next president of the United States? Sanders' surprising success has already influenced Clinton's conduct and fortunes, and there is every reason to believe that he will continue to challenge her, influence her, and create significant problems for her as the race continues," and he lists seven ways here that he cites that she's in trouble.
They are he's "pulling her to the left, exposing her biggest weaknesses, forcing her to go negative, playing a losing expectations game, beating her in the early states, "things like this. Here's a pull quote from the story: "Now, of course, these are mostly speculative scenarios. But none is impossible or even improbable," the ways in which Bernie Sanders could actually win, he means. "All derive directly from Sanders’ manifest strengths, Clinton's manifest weaknesses, and the dynamics and realities of the Democratic Party's nomination process.
"Not long ago, few would have imagined that Sanders could have posed any sort of threat to Clinton’s political fortunes. Sanders might lose in the end, but his successes thus far and going forward make it more likely that Clinton will lose in the end too." I think this guy is right on the men. I think Halperin is right. And I think when it comes to Hillary, the Drive-Bys do not report the negatives or the problems in any way, shape, manner, or form close to truth. They protect her. They have to. She's chosen one.
Until somebody comes along they like better, like Obama did 2008.
You may very well be right. You know there will be no one throwing the BLM group out of the RNC in Cleveland.
They will just stand there and take it.
All the Mob has to do is roll out Squaw Warren and they’ll have Baraq 2.0.
She’d crush Hillary for the D nomination, and win the general with 43% of the vote and 370 evs. (assuming Jeb Bush is the R the nominee and there’s a viable 3rd party conservative on the ballot in most red states).
Axlegrease and ValJ could still call all the shots.
Baraq could collect ginormous bribes from POTUS pardons and move on to a fabulous life of leisure.
Which of course begs the question: Of the three, who would you prefer?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.