Posted on 07/19/2015 10:59:36 AM PDT by Will88
Hannity will probably have “fox news contributor” Turd Blossom Rove on to cluck about it. Or maybe Dana Perino “another fox news contributor.”
At least they ought to have the decency to call them “ Republican political operatives.” Personally, I’d call them GOPe shills.
Good summation of some of the critical issues on which McCain is and has been totally wrong for years. McCain is one of the most offensive members of Congress and those other GOP candidates should be asked about some of his damaging and inflammatory remarks. But they probably won’t be asked.
You must be "just a plain fool" because you are incapable of realizing that the critical issues of this campaign do not fit into the old liberal/conservative categories.
Makes me wonder, though...
Since the GOPe has the same visceral hatred for Christian based Western Culture as the left does,
is it really cheap labor that drives them to “rinosity”?
Or is it hatred of Christian values?
Political operatives are exactly what Rove and Perino are. Hannity has been fairly good concerning Trump and the issues he's addressing.
The “critical issues” are all the things Trump is lying about. He won’t close the border, he won’t change the trade deficit. These are all things that helped him build his fortune. Hell, he doesn’t even want to be president, this is just one more Clinton campaign donation from him. The guy only registered GOP last year, he’s just a spoiler, in it to throw it. Every single thing he says and does in this campaign is a lie, his very PRESENCE in the campaign is a lie, and you’re buying it.
Lol, well, you’ve got your story, so stick to it.
“Yup. Self deluded dupes who are deliberately ignoring Trumps long history of being a liberal. He’s lying to you people, stop feeding the ego.”
He’s NOT lying about Amnesty and Open Borders.
He’s NOT lying about Hillary at State Department.
He’s NOT lying about Jeb Bush.
He’s NOT lying about McCain being unpatriotic.
If another candidate would start saying the above, I’d be tempted to support him. So far Cruz is the closest, but he doesn’t have the resources to fight back the way Trump has done.
As for his past - NOBODY gets to build a real estate empire like his without playing both sides - not in New York City - NO WAY. All I see a VERY SHREWD businessman.
Yep, he is a maverick alright.
An adolescent calf straying from the protection of his mother and herd while taking stupid and dangerous actions.
Another name is coyote bait.
McRino is the crazy one.
He’s lying about everything he says he’s going to do.
He doesn’t play both sides. He’s a self described lifetime liberal constant donator to the Clintons. He only ever played ONE side until he said some birther things and suddenly conservatives started worshiping his comb over. He registered for the GOP last year. He’s a liberal. Period. Always has been.
He’s a talented liar. And you’re believing him.
Reality is reality. And reality is you’re buying a line of BS from a lifelong Clinton fan liberal. the only people who’ve made a story are Trump and the idiots believing him.
Doesn’t matter - he is holding Republicans that want to play both sides ACCOUNTABLE - particularly on Amnesty. Until someone else, or the media does that, he’ll have my support, and in 6 months or so, he will have my vote. Until Trump, Republicans have played BOTH SIDES of the issue, and have gotten away with it.
Get Karl Rove to hold Republicans accountable (which he will not), and most of us here will be happy to leave Trump.
Yes it matters. He’s a life long lib OF COURSE that matters. And no he isn’t holding ANYBODY accountable. He’s just spouting the angry words to get all the angry people to not bother to think. Look at his history. Look at what he’s said for the last 25 years. He obviously doesn’t believe a word he’s saying now, and supporting a guy that is openly lying to you is frankly pathetic.
“And no he isn’t holding ANYBODY accountable.”
He’s made both Jeb and Hillary say they have a problem with cities releasing dangerous felons back into the general population when ICE wants them deported. Something our side has been SCREAMING about for decades now, but ignored by the media and ignored by our candidates and office holders.
If you REALLY think that issue would have surfaced without Trump being front-and-center, then you are simply a paid shill, and I’m done with you.
As to Trumps past, I WILL REPEAT, if you want to build stuff in New York City, you sure as hell better play both side, or you will be waiting for 5 years to get your Plumbing Permit approved. It’s that simple there.
I don’t recall the last time I heard a candidate defend his or her supporters like Donald Trump has.
Oh please. The situation in SF forced them to say that, not Donald. And even if he did, making politicians pay lip service to a position isn’t really accountability.
The issue had already surfaced. All Trump did was play politics with a corpse.
Repeat your lie if you want but the facts are Trump DID NOT play both sides. He played one side the Clinton side. Because he’s a liberal. It’s that simple.
“I don’t recall the last time I heard a candidate defend his or her supporters like Donald Trump has.”
I still remember late in the 2008 campaign there was a DJ that was firing up the crowd for McCain’s appearance at a rally. The DJ (or talk radio host, don’t know) said something like to the effect: “The last thing this country needs is Barack Hussein Obama to be our next president”.
McCain came out and ATTACKED THE DJ, not Obama...by calling mention of his middle name (Hussein) a ‘personal attack’. Pretty much took the air out of that rally. Rush played it...didn’t really comment on it, he just wanted his listeners to know who the real McCain was.
It was SICKENING and I remember that like yesterday. McCain wanted to lose, and did a DAMN GOOD JOB of it. The HELL if I’m ever going to give him a break.
Somehow I just don’t see Trump treating his supporters like that, nor Cruz - but others, Jeb for sure, Rubio for sure, and maybe Walker...just may..
is it really cheap labor that drives them to “rinosity”?
Or is it hatred of Christian values?
It’s materialist careerism, IMO. Bags of money, hookers, blow, etc. Principled conservationism gets in the way of all the beltway fun stuff that they signed up for.
“Oh please. The situation in SF forced them to say that, not Donald.”
Sorry but that is total Bull Shiite. This lady would have ended up like the 200 or so Americans before her who were killed by Illegals, relegated to a Page 8 article on Monday and then forgotten. The media would not have touched her story, even under the threat of death.
You can DENY IT all you want, but find me ANY KILLING of an American by an Illegal in a similar setting that has made it to the front pages and become a national issue, and I might believe you. At this point, you are simply DESPERATE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.