Posted on 07/18/2015 7:09:19 PM PDT by markomalley
Seems to me the Left doesn’t mind vilifying people at all.
They just don’t want their own group vilified.
They want it on the same level as racism to shut off debate.
There aren't enough lions in the stadium yet to feed him to, so he'll be placed on leave until the everything is ready.
” it gives folks the ability to act on those things”
hmmmmm like Burn this CIty Down? that sort of thing
“Give them space to destroy”
Whitey must die”
that sort of thing?
there were no stated nor implied directives to do anyone any DAMAGE in tha letter Ms PRIDE WItch!
People that lose their job for voicing their opinion, unless egrigious or threatening, should be able to sue the people harassing them for lost wages.
GAYSTAPO at it again.
Thoughtcrime. Soon to be expanded to criticism of islam, then what?
Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, we can’t have that! All bow down to the new Homosexual “tolerant” Nazis. They are coming for us all.
As it was in the Days of Lot,
so shall it also be the in the Days of the Coming of the Son of Man.
That’s what I thought also.
If he gets fired, get a good attorney, and sue Stockton blind.
They’ll settle.
Then write another letter.
He might have had a clause in his employment contract about using his official position in ways not in keeping with policy, etc., etc. But if not, he might have a case.
This is horse$hit. I worked in NY State Corrections, and wrote the newspaper all the time complaining about Mario Cuomo, as well as the court system. I never got any flak at work about it because I was speaking for myself, and not as a representative of the department. At no time in his letter, did he claim that he was speaking for the police department. For them to put him on leave for writing his own personal feelings and beliefs in a letter to the paper is an abuse of power, and whoever made that decision should be put on leave themself.
Why? Is it illegal now to send a letter to the editor?
A lawsuit that dwarfs Rodney King’s should be filed.
He insisted on signing himself with his rank and employer. Not smart if he wasn’t looking for trouble.
If he worked for me, I’d fire him. When you ask to have a letter to the editor printed with your employer’s name, you are effectively stating that your opinion reflects your employer’s opinion. I can’t think of any respectable business establishment that would allow their employees to do that sort of thing.
You have a right to an opinion not approved by the government only so long as you keep your mouth shut about it.
He didn't use his official position for anything. He wrote the letter as a citizen, not as a spokesman of the department. He isn't identified as a Lieutenant within the letter, or claim his department supports his beliefs. The title that appears under his name could have been added by the paper, and even if he wrote his title under his name when he sent the letter in, he did nothing wrong.
No one would fire him if he signed with his employer’s name and criticized Christian “bigots” who dislike homosexual acts.
You are correct I just saw that he signed the letter with rank, and employer. That’s a no no in almost all circumstances.
No matter what else you never speak for your employer. That’s why they pay people to do it right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.