Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sweet Cakes final order: Gresham Bakery must pay $135,000 (Oregon)
Oregonian ^ | 07/02/2015 | George Rede

Posted on 07/02/2015 3:11:28 PM PDT by aimhigh

Oregon Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian on Thursday ordered the owners of a former Gresham bakery to pay $135,000 in damages to a lesbian couple for refusing to make them a wedding cake.

Avakian's ruling upheld a preliminary finding earlier this year that the owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa had discriminated against the women on the basis of their sexual orientation.

(Excerpt) Read more at oregonlive.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: bakery; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; oregon; sweetcakes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: FreedomStar3028; aimhigh; Lurker; TBP; NormsRevenge
Please help these people. You can do this by contacting the Alliance Defending Freedom, which represented the bakery in Cryer vs Klein and is now handling the appeal. They are fighters! They will appeal rather than pay.

https://www.alliancedefendingfreedom.org/page/courageous-believers?referral=I0615MAR5

It's not much, but I'm throwing in a $20.

42 posted on 07/02/2015 3:34:44 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("If I have a faith that can move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." - 1 Cor 13:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028

But..but.. liberals are such *compassionate* people.. about as compassionate as cobras.


43 posted on 07/02/2015 3:34:57 PM PDT by liberalism is suicide (Communism,fascism-no matter how you slice socialism, its still baloney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

If it happens, it happens.

But the best tack to take is to lean on the Lord while also raising the issue before Caesar. Declaring it over and finished beforehand only cheers for the team in the smoking section of eternity.


44 posted on 07/02/2015 3:35:02 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

as a goose.


45 posted on 07/02/2015 3:35:40 PM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
There are no damages. Their feelings were hurt. That's not damages.

This is nothing more than political retribution. And for the dummy libs who are gleeful about this ruling, remember that different parties will one day take office and use your tactics on you and your children.

46 posted on 07/02/2015 3:36:20 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Let’s hope the bakery doesn’t fold. This definitely needs to be taken all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary. We’ll probably lose regardless, but Americans need to wake up! Gay marriage will trump the civil rights of freedom of association, free exercise of religion, and private property rights, just like those rights were sacrificed to end discrimination against blacks.


47 posted on 07/02/2015 3:36:47 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

This fine is not meant to punish them as much as it is to put them out of business,


48 posted on 07/02/2015 3:37:06 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

Some (brave) whites should go into a rib joint, using racial epithets constantly and loudly, and demand the owners serve them, no matter how offended they are by the behavior of the customers. “I love my ribs, it’s all about love, you cannot deny me my love of ribs simply because you disagree with my opinions and lifestyle.”


49 posted on 07/02/2015 3:37:17 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeepInTheHeartOfTexas

They’ll be forced to pay. After all the fight is gone. I’m not sure why they are even trying to fight it. Just leave.

It is wrong, but you are watching them be forced out of business by the state. The state will force payment out of them. They can do w/e they want.

I agree it’s wrong. It’s ridiculous. Instead of going to another bakery and buying a cake these nasty bitches cried and cried.


50 posted on 07/02/2015 3:38:17 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
The homo sexuals are too dumb to know that the worst Christians will do is not sell them cake, but in the majority Muslim countries practicing Sharia, they would be stoned to death.

At the rate we're going Sharia will be here next!
51 posted on 07/02/2015 3:38:27 PM PDT by ForAmerica (Texas Conservative Christian *born again believer in Jesus Christ* Black Man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

The bakery didn’t refuse serve homosexuals...it refused to bake a type of cake. Avakian is a dishonest snake.


52 posted on 07/02/2015 3:39:53 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
Statement from the lesbian couple (last name on one is very appropriate):

"This has been a terrible ordeal for our entire family. We never imagined finding ourselves caught up in a fight for social justice," they said. "We endured daily, hateful attacks on social media, received death threats and feared for our family's safety, yet our goal remained steadfast. We were determined to ensure that this kind of blatant discrimination never happened to another couple, another family, another Oregonian."
Ms. Bowman and Ms. Cryer

Of course, if they had gone to another bakery after they easily could have gotten their cake and have eaten it too.

53 posted on 07/02/2015 3:40:13 PM PDT by CedarDave (Bush vs. Clinton in 2016? If you have a 24-year old car, the bumper stickers are still good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“This is a judgment leveled by a bureaucracy under a bureaucratic statute. It hasn’t even been in the lowest court.”

This whole travesty was deliberately kept at the bureaucratic level and out of a courtroom where justice might have inadvertently prevailed.

And old Brad is gayer than Paul Lynde sleeping over at Liberace’s house on Oscar night.

There is a judgement coming for all these people, and it isn’t from some corrupt low-level bureaucrat either.


54 posted on 07/02/2015 3:40:59 PM PDT by Junk Silver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh; All
Regardless of pro-gay interpretations of the Equal Protections Clause of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment by pro-gay activist states and likewise actvist justices, patriots need to get familiar with more important language in Section 1 which is being wrongly ignored by both state and fed governments.
14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

55 posted on 07/02/2015 3:41:15 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftless2
The bakery didn’t refuse serve homosexuals...it refused to bake a type of cake.

They bakery makes wedding cakes for others but refused to make one for homosexuals. That's seems to be illegal under Oregon law.

56 posted on 07/02/2015 3:42:32 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: driftless2

This is the kind of thing that courts are, at least in principle, answerable to investigate.

Bureaucrats? Whoo whoo, here comes the railroad train.


57 posted on 07/02/2015 3:42:43 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

It refused to furnish a specific decoration for a specific kind of ceremony. This was not like walking into a place and purchasing a blank cake.


58 posted on 07/02/2015 3:43:54 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

+1.


59 posted on 07/02/2015 3:44:15 PM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

In this case it is a Tenth Amendment issue. There are no federal laws protecting homosexuals from discrimination, but Oregon passed their own.


60 posted on 07/02/2015 3:44:25 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson