Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jindal: SCOTUS Is 'Out of Control, Let's Just Get Rid of the Court'
Townhall.com ^ | June 26, 2015 | Leah Barkoukis

Posted on 06/27/2015 4:52:25 AM PDT by Kaslin

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal slammed the Supreme Court on Friday after its ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage.

“The Supreme Court is completely out of control, making laws on their own, and has become a public opinion poll instead of a judicial body,” the 2016 presidential candidate said in a statement.

“If we want to save some money, let’s just get rid of the court,” Jindal added.

The 5-4 ruling, which forces all states to recognize same-sex marriage under the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, will fundamentally transform the institution of marriage, he later said.

“Marriage between a man and a woman was established by God, and no earthly court can alter that,” he added.

Jindal also echoed Franklin Graham warning today that the persecution of Christians is coming with this ruling.

“Hillary Clinton and the Left will now mount an all-out assault on religious freedom guaranteed in the First Amendment,” he said.

“Regardless of your views on marriage, all freedom-loving people must pledge to respect our first amendment rights,” he added.

Chief Justice John Roberts was particularly concerned with the religious freedom aspect of the ruling as well.

“Many good and decent people oppose same-sex marriage as a tenet of faith,” he wrote in his dissenting opinion, “and their freedom to exercise religion is—unlike the right imagined by the majority—actually spelled out in the Constitution.”

Christians “better be ready,” Graham warned.   


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: 2016election; bobbyjindal; election2016; fagmarriage; homosexualagenda; jindal; louisiana; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Kaslin

When ISIS takes control, I don’t think they will have a lot of use for the Supreme Court.


21 posted on 06/27/2015 5:23:16 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. All federal judges to face a retention vote of the citizens of the Districts they preside over every six years. Failure to get a 50% retention vote will cause them to be removed from the bench. Three Supreme Court Justices will be put before the people every two years.
22 posted on 06/27/2015 5:23:35 AM PDT by MCF (If my home can't be my Castle, then it will be my Alamo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The only solution I can see is that WE, conservatives, get off our asses and get out there. Unfortunately we seem to be a leaderless blob. It was heartening when the Tea Party rose up, seemingly leaderless a few years ago.

We are not headed to the loss of our country and it’s Law and Order rather Law and Order have been dismissed by men, right before our eye. It is not a future probability. It is done.


23 posted on 06/27/2015 5:24:21 AM PDT by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WHBates

We need to pull an “Obama” on the SC. Just flat out ignore them and their laws they write. If we had the presidency, senate and the house we could just not pay any attention to them. What can they do, declare war on us? They do not control the IRS, FBI or any federal law enforcement group. Issue an arrest warrant? Fine, who is going to enforce it?

Obama gets away with it every day with his daily selection of what laws he does not want to enforce. Just let the ying yangs sit in their ivory tower fussing about “the people” not obeying them. Sotomayer would get bitchy, Kagen would cry Ginsburg would turn into a mummy and Kennedy would get pissed and ride of on his bicycle.


24 posted on 06/27/2015 5:24:32 AM PDT by biff (Et Tu Boeh-ner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

“I predict that within five years, “

Why on earth do you think it will take that long. Within a year, guaranteed.


25 posted on 06/27/2015 5:27:27 AM PDT by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Pietro
Isn't it amazing that Obama talks about the need for father figures in the home, yet celebrates "Demitrius has two mommies"?

I will never get over the desecration of the WH with the gay pride colors last night.

26 posted on 06/27/2015 5:29:05 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

If Cruz wins in 2016, I think a lot of wind comes out of the liberal’s sails.

It’s possible that 4 supremes can retire in the next 8 years. With a Republican president and republican congress, it would be possible to put on justices who can reverse what the current court has done. With young justices, the rulings would stay in place for many, many years.

Ginsberg, Breyer and Kennedy can all be gone during the next administration. Can you imagine if they are replaced by justices that think like Scalia and Thomas?


27 posted on 06/27/2015 5:29:40 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Isn't it funny that Socialists never want to share their own money?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Mercat

I agree with your predictions, but I think the time-frame is going to be much quicker than you think. Things are deteriorating at an ever-exponential rate.

There’s almost a historical constant, in how unexpectedly rapid collapses occur. It ALWAYS seems to catch people off-guard.


29 posted on 06/27/2015 5:32:04 AM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: biff

That tactic works for the illegal aliens-just ignore the law. Of course, they have the backing of the federal government, and more than a few local governments (”sanctuary” cities, etc).


30 posted on 06/27/2015 5:34:15 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bert

True


31 posted on 06/27/2015 5:34:30 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: greene66

Yes, it does seem to be operating on the snowball effect-the farther it goes, the faster it goes.


32 posted on 06/27/2015 5:35:14 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Article III can be amended, and there is a proposed amendment that provides a framework for legal nullification of federal court decisions by a majority of the states.

It can be, which is what Ted Cruz has been proposing. But that's not what Jindal has been talking about.

Meanwhile, there is the Rosa Parks / Gandhi solution, which can be practiced by individuals. Doesn't save any money, but smells like freedom, to me.

And it may well come down to that.

33 posted on 06/27/2015 5:37:32 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: biff
The Supreme Court has no business writing laws. That's the job of Congress.
34 posted on 06/27/2015 5:38:21 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

People often rise to the expectations and titles given to them. :-)


35 posted on 06/27/2015 5:41:28 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat ( The ballot is a suggestion box for slaves and fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Slash budgets to the bone. Shut down government if need be.


36 posted on 06/27/2015 5:43:33 AM PDT by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Here is a fun fact about Louisisna. It’s GDP is roughly 257 billion. For comparison’s sake, it ranks in between Finland and Egypt with regards to GDP.


37 posted on 06/27/2015 5:52:17 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat ( The ballot is a suggestion box for slaves and fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is stupid. The institution is just fine. The individuals in it, as in the two other branches, allow personal opinions and gain to influence their decisions.


38 posted on 06/27/2015 5:52:59 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Kaslin: "The Supreme Court has no business writing laws.
That's the job of Congress."

Not any more.
There is now precedent x > 2.
A different Congress (which did not regard Americans
as their Enemy as they arm al Qaeda) COULD change this.
Not on this Congress. Not ever.
In fact, THIS Congress, including Boehner,
made a LOT of money by this unConstitutional Decision.

39 posted on 06/27/2015 5:53:06 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

GO BOBBY! And a speedy capital trial too!


40 posted on 06/27/2015 5:54:59 AM PDT by Viennacon (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson