Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: Second Amendment First
Somewhere out there is a picture of her and the Beast.
2 posted on
06/12/2015 2:06:47 PM PDT by
rrrod
(Just an old guy with a gun in his pocket.)
To: Second Amendment First
If she is disqualified because of her race, isn’t that discrimination?
3 posted on
06/12/2015 2:07:33 PM PDT by
The_Media_never_lie
(The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
To: Second Amendment First
4 posted on
06/12/2015 2:07:41 PM PDT by
Crazieman
(Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
To: Second Amendment First
MSM-enabled sociopaths and psychopaths
continue until the MSM-enablement CEASES.
5 posted on
06/12/2015 2:07:43 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
To: Second Amendment First
I’m a white Hispanic moonlighting as an eskimo on the weekends.
6 posted on
06/12/2015 2:08:04 PM PDT by
TurboZamboni
(Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
To: Second Amendment First
Oh the humanity...”White Privilege” is SOOO bad in America, even black leaders lose their jobs to white women! When will it end???
7 posted on
06/12/2015 2:08:12 PM PDT by
Jan_Sobieski
(Sanctification)
To: Second Amendment First
If it is such a disadvantage in America to be a minority, how come people like her and Elizabeth Warren go to such length, and even commit fraud to be counted as a minority? Huh?
To: Second Amendment First
If Ward Churchill married Rachel Dolezal and procreated, it would be the first case of a Native American and a Negress producing Caucasian children.
9 posted on
06/12/2015 2:10:26 PM PDT by
gorush
(History repeats itself because human nature is static)
To: Second Amendment First
If Bruce Jenner can call himself a woman, why can’t she call herself black?
10 posted on
06/12/2015 2:10:31 PM PDT by
zeebee
To: Second Amendment First
So now it is the height of (liberal) white American privelige to declare that one is an African American?
11 posted on
06/12/2015 2:10:42 PM PDT by
Wilhelm Tell
(True or False? This is not a tag line.)
To: Second Amendment First
Why can’t she be black?
If Bruce Jenner can be a woman, then she can be black! or a camel or a Trans-Am.
12 posted on
06/12/2015 2:12:13 PM PDT by
GeronL
To: Second Amendment First
then there’s THIS guy: https://twitter.com/GodfreyElfwick/status/609267943050997760
So what. She wants to be black. Back in the day in the Army we’d call these folks “spodas.”
As in “she spoda be black.”
That race change clinic Michael Jackson went to might still be in business...
thank you, you’re too kind. I’m here all week. Tip your waiter.
13 posted on
06/12/2015 2:12:15 PM PDT by
normbal
(normbal. somewhere in socialist occupied America)
To: Second Amendment First
Years ago, Howard Stern used to refer to people like her as “wiggers.” She’s not the only poseur though, just look at what’s in the White Hut! If we can believe the historians (and who his father really was) he’s 6.75% African Black. In both cases, looks can be very deceiving.
To: Second Amendment First
Fauxcahontas said it was OK, because someone told her...
16 posted on
06/12/2015 2:13:30 PM PDT by
DUMBGRUNT
(BINGO!)
To: Second Amendment First
I self identify as a Google billionaire. Where’s my special elite treatment and free stuff?!
17 posted on
06/12/2015 2:13:39 PM PDT by
Waryone
To: Second Amendment First
I am a white blonde haired woman that masquerades as a Cherokee/Delaware Indian at work....Darn! Someone beat me to it!!!
19 posted on
06/12/2015 2:13:43 PM PDT by
Jan_Sobieski
(Sanctification)
To: Second Amendment First
I don't see what the big deal is supposed to be. For one thing, if we let people self-identify their gender, allow roosters to marry roosters and hens to marry hens, then why shouldn't we allow people to self-identify by race?
For another, if it is so cool to have a self-identified black guy (actually 3/8th at most) run a country which is 87% non-black, then why shouldn't it be equally cool to have a non-black gal run a single chapter of the NAACP?
They don't require a blood-test to join the DAR, just proof of service of an ancestor in the American Revolution.
20 posted on
06/12/2015 2:13:45 PM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: Second Amendment First
Has she committed a crime?
Probably not.
Has she made the entire liberal educational establishment look like a bunch of absolute idiots?
Most definitely..................
26 posted on
06/12/2015 2:16:15 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
To: Second Amendment First
Still the Post can't bring itself to be honest about the topic. She took on a black identity because she wanted to share the advantages: a sense of grievance, a sense of oppression, a sense of self-righteousness, a sense of entitlement, a full-ride scholarship, and employment in well-paying jobs in the grievance industry. That's why she did it. That any of that stuff exists at all is the topic at hand and they're avoiding it like a vampire avoids holy water.
To: Second Amendment First
The damage she has done is to expose the hypocrisy and outright lunacy of the Left’s gender and racial victim agenda.
28 posted on
06/12/2015 2:16:40 PM PDT by
DaxtonBrown
(http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson