Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mad Max and the Dream-Work of Homosexuality
American Thinker ^ | Robert Oscar Lopez

Posted on 05/21/2015 4:06:10 AM PDT by RoosterRedux

The dystopian images of Fury Road depart significantly from the Mad Max films of the 1970s and 1980s. Fury Road presents us with a world where motherhood is commodified to suit an elite class of males who wish to share their property and life ambitions only with other men. Women are hooked up to machines that pump milk from their breasts and held inside dismal barracks, gestating heirs for warlords who show no sexual interest in women. The men of this warrior ruling class derive all their ecstasy from the company of muscular young males eager to labor and soldier for each other and for their male patrons.

I doubt anyone on the production team has read “Breeders: How Gay Men Destroyed the Left.” Hence I am left to conclude that the movie’s pretext embodies everything that “anti-gay” opponents of surrogacy such as myself have been warning, because there is a deep-seated but suppressed anxiety running rampant in Hollywood about just how horrible our society will become if gay men are uncritically awarded everything they demand.

The male body is reduced to its muscularity and force, the female body to its breasts and capacity for birth. The elitists who run the “Citadel” have decided to keep these two objectified classes separate, in precisely the way that mainstream gay culture segregates gay men from lesbians, and both from the heterosexual masses who depend on male-female cooperation to found families and populate the nation.

A number of conservatives have been puzzled by the left’s simultaneous defense of gay men and Islamists. The cognitive dissonance might belie a deeper coherence: both Islamists and gay men aspire to separate men from women, albeit in different realms, to the noted benefit of men and to the obvious rejection of women as autonomous beings with dignity/rights.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hollywood; homosexualagenda; moviereview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Old Sarge

I am with you. There is nothing particularly joyful about homosexuality. I would wish that affliction/curse on anyone.

Same with the rainbow. They take something beautiful and try to make it ugly.


61 posted on 05/21/2015 8:09:16 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty or Big Government - you can't have both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lake Living; RoosterRedux
His wrath can’t be far off at this point.

His wrath will follow the persecution, which is coming soon.

62 posted on 05/21/2015 8:10:30 AM PDT by aimhigh (1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

There is probably nothing more dangerous and sadistic than a male homosexual psychopath.


63 posted on 05/21/2015 8:13:52 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty or Big Government - you can't have both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Dennis Prager wrote an article about this. Prager is probably the “wise rabbi” that the author refers to, since they both live in the San Fernando Valley of Los Angeles. Here is the Prager article: http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles2/PragerHomosexuality.php


64 posted on 05/21/2015 8:16:00 AM PDT by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HLPhat

To my knowledge the OT was first in universally condemning male homosexuality. If you are aware of an earlier condemnation, please cite it.

Though doing the same for lesbianism would have undermined male dominated polygamous marriage and concubinage prevalent at the time. It wasn’t until NT Romans 1:26 that lesbianism followed suit.


65 posted on 05/21/2015 8:57:53 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: HLPhat

In older cultures males were omnisexual with a preference for human females. That is plain in the historical record of ancient Greece, Rome, and in present Moslem societies, especially Arab and Urdu. It is not considered “homosexuality” in those cultures unless the human female is shunned in favor of other males. It is/was, in fact considered normal in those cultures for young boys to be the sex objects of adult men until they are themselves adult men. Your discomfort with Judaeo-Christianity is curious. The “normalization” of pure homosexuality and pansexuality is being forced on modern Western Civilization now.


66 posted on 05/21/2015 9:20:00 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
"Sex [in ancient societies] is understood fundamentally not as interaction, but as a doing of some thing to someone..."

That's why I've always thought that the expression "do me" - as an invitation to sexual intercourse - has kind of a creepy connotation. It is not very far from "rape me."
67 posted on 05/21/2015 9:42:38 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
The 7 Noahide Laws would be the first condemnation of homosexuality.
68 posted on 05/21/2015 9:47:55 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (WSC: The truth is incontrovertible; malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
The Prager article points out something that I've seen from personal experience: rejecting Judeo-Christian sexual morality quickly leads - if one allows the logic of it to go unchecked - to a condition of utter promiscuity. Hence the widespread use of porn, the spread of the homosexual movement, and the coarsening of popular culture.

The blatant, public sex of "Game of Thrones" is probably the next thing we'll see. People won't be able to come up with a non-religious argument against it, and the courts will declare it a right. Eventually, things will bottom out, we will reach a state of chaos, and we'll have a rebirth of traditional morality.
69 posted on 05/21/2015 9:49:51 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Or the conquest of an utterly enfeebled culture by a foreign entity and the imposition of the conqueror’s notions of morality on the survivors.


70 posted on 05/21/2015 10:27:43 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
As I indicated, from the Old Testament, though not specific until Leviticus.
71 posted on 05/21/2015 10:40:31 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963

The “Green Place” essentially died as part of the ongoing natural catastrophe resulting from the war. It’s more subtle in this movie than it was in Thunderdome, but there was at least a limited nuclear exchange. Recall that once the main characters met up with the tribe of old women, they faced a 160 day ride across the Great Salt plain. The implication is that the oceans are gone, or nearly so. The planet is dying, and the Green Place is a victim of that. I recommend you go to tvtropes.org, which has a fair amount of info on the movie, including some background that came out in other materials.


72 posted on 05/21/2015 11:45:53 AM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

I don’t know what movie this Lopez guy was watching but it wasn’t the same one I saw. Seemed to me the ‘bad guy’ was a tyrant who had his followers believing he was some kind of a god.

One of the twinkies, or whatever Lopez called them, nickname was Nux, was sure trying to kick it with the redhead.


73 posted on 05/21/2015 3:41:59 PM PDT by Cap'n Crunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

>>the “normalization” of pure homosexuality and
>>pansexuality is being forced on modern Western
>>Civilization now.

It’s not the first time.

Romans 1:25+ describes a natural cycle where cultures worship themselves, pervert nature, and suffer the due penalty.

Rinse, wash, repeat.


74 posted on 05/21/2015 6:48:40 PM PDT by HLPhat (This space is intentionally blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

Does natural selection favor hetero or homosexuality?

Hetero. Why is that? Because the genetic the exchange produced by sex increases the fitness of species.

The mutual masturbation selected and worshiped by reprobate perverts isn’t sex.


75 posted on 05/21/2015 6:53:05 PM PDT by HLPhat (This space is intentionally blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Thank you for that link. Its been added to my file of stuff... ;-)


76 posted on 05/21/2015 10:31:59 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: HLPhat

If you are aware of an earlier condemnation, please cite it.


77 posted on 05/21/2015 10:35:55 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

I agree. I, too, rebel against newspeak and refuse to call homosexuals “gay”— they are homosexuals or pervs. Ditto for leftists who are not “liberals” (a true liberal favors low government interference in economics) nor “progressive” (reverting to baby killing like the ancient pre-Christian Romans is not “progressive”)


78 posted on 05/22/2015 12:26:46 AM PDT by Cronos (ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Do you, find it hard to communicate your idealism, in relevant context?


79 posted on 05/22/2015 12:33:48 AM PDT by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

Nature refutes your Biblical assertion. It selected hetero-sex-uality billions of years before the sheeple herders started perching on their the state-establishing temple steps.


80 posted on 05/22/2015 5:24:07 AM PDT by HLPhat (This space is intentionally blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson