Posted on 05/21/2015 4:06:10 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
The dystopian images of Fury Road depart significantly from the Mad Max films of the 1970s and 1980s. Fury Road presents us with a world where motherhood is commodified to suit an elite class of males who wish to share their property and life ambitions only with other men. Women are hooked up to machines that pump milk from their breasts and held inside dismal barracks, gestating heirs for warlords who show no sexual interest in women. The men of this warrior ruling class derive all their ecstasy from the company of muscular young males eager to labor and soldier for each other and for their male patrons.
I doubt anyone on the production team has read Breeders: How Gay Men Destroyed the Left. Hence I am left to conclude that the movies pretext embodies everything that anti-gay opponents of surrogacy such as myself have been warning, because there is a deep-seated but suppressed anxiety running rampant in Hollywood about just how horrible our society will become if gay men are uncritically awarded everything they demand.
The male body is reduced to its muscularity and force, the female body to its breasts and capacity for birth. The elitists who run the Citadel have decided to keep these two objectified classes separate, in precisely the way that mainstream gay culture segregates gay men from lesbians, and both from the heterosexual masses who depend on male-female cooperation to found families and populate the nation.
A number of conservatives have been puzzled by the lefts simultaneous defense of gay men and Islamists. The cognitive dissonance might belie a deeper coherence: both Islamists and gay men aspire to separate men from women, albeit in different realms, to the noted benefit of men and to the obvious rejection of women as autonomous beings with dignity/rights.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I am with you. There is nothing particularly joyful about homosexuality. I would wish that affliction/curse on anyone.
Same with the rainbow. They take something beautiful and try to make it ugly.
His wrath will follow the persecution, which is coming soon.
There is probably nothing more dangerous and sadistic than a male homosexual psychopath.
Dennis Prager wrote an article about this. Prager is probably the “wise rabbi” that the author refers to, since they both live in the San Fernando Valley of Los Angeles. Here is the Prager article: http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles2/PragerHomosexuality.php
To my knowledge the OT was first in universally condemning male homosexuality. If you are aware of an earlier condemnation, please cite it.
Though doing the same for lesbianism would have undermined male dominated polygamous marriage and concubinage prevalent at the time. It wasn’t until NT Romans 1:26 that lesbianism followed suit.
In older cultures males were omnisexual with a preference for human females. That is plain in the historical record of ancient Greece, Rome, and in present Moslem societies, especially Arab and Urdu. It is not considered “homosexuality” in those cultures unless the human female is shunned in favor of other males. It is/was, in fact considered normal in those cultures for young boys to be the sex objects of adult men until they are themselves adult men. Your discomfort with Judaeo-Christianity is curious. The “normalization” of pure homosexuality and pansexuality is being forced on modern Western Civilization now.
Or the conquest of an utterly enfeebled culture by a foreign entity and the imposition of the conqueror’s notions of morality on the survivors.
The “Green Place” essentially died as part of the ongoing natural catastrophe resulting from the war. It’s more subtle in this movie than it was in Thunderdome, but there was at least a limited nuclear exchange. Recall that once the main characters met up with the tribe of old women, they faced a 160 day ride across the Great Salt plain. The implication is that the oceans are gone, or nearly so. The planet is dying, and the Green Place is a victim of that. I recommend you go to tvtropes.org, which has a fair amount of info on the movie, including some background that came out in other materials.
I don’t know what movie this Lopez guy was watching but it wasn’t the same one I saw. Seemed to me the ‘bad guy’ was a tyrant who had his followers believing he was some kind of a god.
One of the twinkies, or whatever Lopez called them, nickname was Nux, was sure trying to kick it with the redhead.
>>the normalization of pure homosexuality and
>>pansexuality is being forced on modern Western
>>Civilization now.
It’s not the first time.
Romans 1:25+ describes a natural cycle where cultures worship themselves, pervert nature, and suffer the due penalty.
Rinse, wash, repeat.
Does natural selection favor hetero or homosexuality?
Hetero. Why is that? Because the genetic the exchange produced by sex increases the fitness of species.
The mutual masturbation selected and worshiped by reprobate perverts isn’t sex.
Thank you for that link. Its been added to my file of stuff... ;-)
If you are aware of an earlier condemnation, please cite it.
I agree. I, too, rebel against newspeak and refuse to call homosexuals “gay”— they are homosexuals or pervs. Ditto for leftists who are not “liberals” (a true liberal favors low government interference in economics) nor “progressive” (reverting to baby killing like the ancient pre-Christian Romans is not “progressive”)
Do you, find it hard to communicate your idealism, in relevant context?
Nature refutes your Biblical assertion. It selected hetero-sex-uality billions of years before the sheeple herders started perching on their the state-establishing temple steps.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.