Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How viable would a pipeline waterway from the wet areas to the dry areas be?
FReerepublic discussion ^ | May 10, 2015 | knarf

Posted on 05/10/2015 7:07:34 PM PDT by knarf

Hmmmm ... hundreds of thousands of immediate jobs, very little expense ... no environmental impact ... California gets water


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: California; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: california; drought; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-127 next last
To: cripplecreek

SW Pa too ... the green exploded overnight a couple of days ago.


61 posted on 05/10/2015 7:57:14 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true .... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

One of the reasons I prefer Meijer stores is the availability of lots of locally grown produce. For most of the year, all of the potatoes, carrots, onions, and apples I buy are grown within 30 miles of where I sit. I’ve also got a veggie farm at the other end of the lake that I visit a lot in the fall.


62 posted on 05/10/2015 8:00:24 PM PDT by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Being part of the CA FReeper Community, I find your Comment a bit insensitive. LOL

We are living behind Enemy Lines out here, including the Fresno Robinson Clan.

If it’s Yellow let it Mellow, if it’s Brown Vote him down.


63 posted on 05/10/2015 8:00:51 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Hillary, because it's time for a POTUS without a SCROTUS...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Modern waterworks plan for about 200gal/capita day, although tactical infantry operations might plan for 5 gal/manday.

Roman aqueducts serving Rome also provided about 200gal/capita day or about 1 cubic meter of water per person/day.


64 posted on 05/10/2015 8:01:15 PM PDT by Cvengr ( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

That depends on whether your eyes absorb light or emit dark.


65 posted on 05/10/2015 8:02:09 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knarf

I’m thinking let them die of thirst. They let most of their water run into the ocean to protect something that has survived millions of years w/o human protection.


66 posted on 05/10/2015 8:02:15 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf
"There are farmers that used to farm farms that were intentionally turned into deserts"

Most of the farming land in California was desert before they built the aqueduct system.

67 posted on 05/10/2015 8:02:25 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: knarf

California doesn’t need more water. It needs an honest pricing system for the water it has. That would chase away the wasteful and uneconomical usage of water to places where those uses are affordable. It would also chase away that part of its population dependent on the current subsidies. The challenge for the rest of the country (and points south) will be resisting the bad habits of the ex-Californians.


68 posted on 05/10/2015 8:03:51 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

The Mississippi can at times get too low and be closed to shipping, it is a vital artery. The Great Lakes cannot be tapped, again the need to keep shipping channels deep enough. Besides, that would involve Canada as well. Nope, as someone said, move the people to the water makes the most sense.


69 posted on 05/10/2015 8:04:01 PM PDT by biggerten (Love you, Mom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: knarf

If CA and its municipalities had responsible governments, this crisis would have been avoided. But instead of focusing on infrastructure and the other things that responsible governments attend to, CA has championed every zany left-wing cause imaginable. Let them parch. Maybe that will help the CA voters wake up.


70 posted on 05/10/2015 8:04:03 PM PDT by matt1234 (2015-2016 America's enemies sense obama's weakness and strike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
Most of the farming land in California was desert before they built the aqueduct system.

LOL Yup. If you had rain, you couldn't turn it into a desert if you tried.
71 posted on 05/10/2015 8:04:58 PM PDT by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Fast Moving Angel
How are you going to get it past the environmentalists?

I live in New York. Lefties here of all stripes would FREAK OUT if it was ever proposed to ship Great Lakes water to the SW. I imagine same is true in Michigan, Illinois, etc...

72 posted on 05/10/2015 8:07:50 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer
It needs an honest pricing system for the water it has. That would chase away the wasteful and uneconomical usage of water to places where those uses are affordable.

Like the "progressive" income tax. The more progressive (and filthy rich) they are....the higher their rate for water.

Perfect fit for the Californicators.

73 posted on 05/10/2015 8:08:17 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: knarf

I’ve had a few more seconds to think about it and it doesn’t matter where you take the water from you are going to be messing with a protected eco-system. Environmentalists have ruined this country. I mean people can’t even do things on their own land without permission or running afoul of government, everything is a wetland even some dry land is considered a wetland because it is wet when it rains. It makes no sense.


74 posted on 05/10/2015 8:08:19 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

This is an excellent idea but the environmentalists will block it. Why waste all of that flood water when we could divert it to where it is needed? Desalination is hideously expensive.

When I lived in Texas I used to notice a 2 degree drop when crossing the man-made lakes near Tyler,Texas and the temperature would go up as soon as I crossed onto dry land.

In 2011 it was 118 degrees in Plano, Texas and 160 degrees on the pavement.

Save the water, put it where it can be used.

Governor Connolly proposed such an idea in 1964 and was shot down but it is doable. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. They are obstructionists until they are fighting over the last glass of water and then the scales will fall from their eyes. We can live without a lot of things but we can’t live without water.


75 posted on 05/10/2015 8:10:36 PM PDT by RichardW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer

“The challenge for the rest of the country will be resisting the bad habits of the ex-Californians.”

We are in Ohio. We have water. We do not waste it. We garden. We do not water. We garden in such a way as to preserve the water we have.

We have grass, 5 acres of it, and some of it is pasture for our horses. We do not water...any of it. That is wasteful. We also do not fertilize, except with excrement from our horses. We do not use herbicides, and especially, we do not use Round-Up.

We recycle. Everything that is recyclable. Our trash hauling company makes big money off us...we have mostly empty/almost empty barrels each week.


76 posted on 05/10/2015 8:11:14 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: knarf
The surface elevation of Lake Superior, the westernmost of the Great Lakes and the highest, is 600 feet above sea level. Maybe you would like to pump that water consistently uphill across hundreds of miles to an elevation of several thousands of feet in Colorado, much less California? Cheap and easy. You betcha.
77 posted on 05/10/2015 8:18:56 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

And then dumped trillions of gallons into the ocean rather than use it because of the “Delta smelt” non-native species of trash fish.


78 posted on 05/10/2015 8:20:57 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

Used to live in CA. Still have family there.

Nothing is going to change for the better in CA until they hit rock bottom and it *really* starts to hurt, like a junkie.


79 posted on 05/10/2015 8:22:33 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Oh, and don’t forget how they tore down dams and removed water reservoirs in the name of Mother Gaia.


80 posted on 05/10/2015 8:23:43 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson