Posted on 04/28/2015 7:53:17 PM PDT by Olog-hai
As the Supreme Court heard opening arguments on gay marriage Tuesday, one anti-gay marriage protester disrupted the calm of the courtroom and issued an afterlife warning for those who support same-sex unions.
If you support gay marriage, you will burn in hell! the protester screamed before he was detained by police and escorted out of the building, CNN reports. But that didnt stop the man from continuing to shout his views about homosexuality and damnation as he was dragged out of the Supreme Court.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Did they actually manage to ID the guy as a Conservative?
I thought my mom was here on Staten Island today.
Well stated.
Westboro Baptist Church trying to muddy the waters?
What will Roberts do?
Those Democrats? If it advances the left agenda, they’d be there trying to get publicity.
Friends of Al Gore.
Alinsky himself employed this method, quite deviously. Alinsky biographer, Sanford D. Horwitt provides an anecdote using precisely this same diabolical tactic to deceive the people. From Horwitt's Let Them Call Me Rebel:Source.
"...in the spring of 1972, at Tulane University...students asked Alinsky to help plan a protest of a scheduled speech by George H. W. Bush, then U.S. representative to the United Nations - a speech likely to include a defense of the Nixon administration's Vietnam War policies. The students told Alinsky they were thinking about picketing or disrupting Bush's address. That's the wrong approach, he rejoined, not very creative - and besides causing a disruption might get them thrown out of school.He told them, instead, to go to hear the speech dressed as members of the Ku Klux Klan, and whenever Bush said something in defense of the Vietnam War, they should cheer and wave placards reading, The KKK supports Bush.' And that is what they did, with very successful, attention-getting results."
Planting major falsehoods has been a favorite Alinsky strategy from the start. His acolyte, Barack Obama, learned his Industrial Areas Foundation lessons on deceiving for power while on a side trip during his Harvard years, then taught the Alinsky power tactics at the University of Chicago.
Might know him-only kidding.
It wasn't me. I double checked.
/johnny
I’m still in Texas. OTH, my doppelganger.....
Counsel, Im not sure its necessary to get into sexual orientation to resolve the case, Roberts said. I mean, if Sue loves Joe and Tom loves Joe, Sue can marry him and Tom cant. And the difference is based upon their different sex. Why isnt that a straightforward question of sexual discrimination?
He said: Counsel, Im not sure its necessary to get into sexual orientation to resolve the case, Roberts said. I mean, if Sue loves Joe and Tom loves Joe, Sue can marry him and Tom cant. And the difference is based upon their different sex. Why isnt that a straightforward question of sexual discrimination?
Well then, we know how this will turn out.
Used to be this was a country where the people were sovereign and decided things like what was marriage.
I have an alibi.
Who knows if this was false-flag or something else.
Yep, he did so back in June of 2012.
I don't want "the people" deciding something as fundamental as marriage. Recall that "the people" built a golden calf in defiance of Almighty God. Democracy is nothing more than mob rule. The definition of marriage has always been -- and will always be -- what the Lord mandates. This American Republic was built on a Biblical Foundation as set forth by the Founders. This nation absolutely must return to God or it shall surely perish.
Of course the good theologian will ask “what do you mean by ‘loves’”?
It’s only in an Alice In Wonderland system that buggery can be deemed to be love. Something does not need to be banned to be bad, but these fine distinctions seem to escape our robed solons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.