Terrance Patrick Bean greets President Obama, as Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber looks on.
Posted on 04/22/2015 7:33:23 AM PDT by Perseverando
Terrance Patrick Bean greets President Obama, as Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber looks on.
“It seems to me that in the gay community the people who should be running interference for NAM/BLA are the parents and friends of gays. Because if the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what 13-, 14-, and 15-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world.”
– Harry Hay, founder of the modern “gay rights” movement
None of it matters: Neither common sense, nor an abundance of victim testimony, peer-reviewed studies, nor their own loathsome admissions and actions. Nothing will move secular-”progressives” to acknowledge the undeniable interplay between homosexuality and childhood sexual abuse.
Whether it’s boy-raping “gay” priests, or boy-raping “gay” activists, the problem is systemic. Homosexual predators are targeting our boys.
You listening, Boy Scouts of America?
So here we go again. Yet another high-profile “gay” activist has been arrested for homosexual assault on a child. This time authorities bagged a big fish (a rainbow trout?) in boy-loving real estate mogul Terrance Patrick Bean. Bean co-founded the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), which is one of the world’s largest, wealthiest and most powerful anti-Christian, pro-homosexual organizations. Bean is also a major bundler for the DNC and BFFs with Barack and Michelle Obama (see video below). He helped found HRC for the sole purpose of pushing the extremist homosexual political agenda. While, not surprisingly, HRC rushed to scrub its website of any reference to his existence, even now Bean remains on this extremist group’s board of directors.
As reported in the Oregonian and a handful of other publications (don’t expect widespread media coverage on
(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.wnd.com ...
” Homosexual predators are targeting our boys”
It doesn’t matter - they would simply counter that heterosexual predators are targeting our girls, so why is one worse than the other?
From the article, "At 4:22 p.m., Bean bailed out of the downtown Portland jail, posting 10 percent, or $5,000 of his $50,000 bail, according to jail records."
I also saw that he is pleading not guilty. (Imagine that?)
Well, well, it seems "Mr. Bean" has made a lot of money in the gay porn business.
Also found another bit of info on the Daily Caller from July, 2012 with a video clip of Obama giving the shout out:
ONE of the “bundlers” who has raised $50,000 to $100,000 for the Barack Obama presidential campaign is Terrence Bean, who once controlled the biggest producer of gay porn in America.
Bean, the first gay on Sen. Obama’s National Finance Committee, is the sole trustee of the Charles M. Holmes Foundation, which owned Falcon Studios, Jock Studios and Mustang Studios, the producers of about $10 million worth of all-male pornography a year.
Now, now, we should be tolerant and openminded. There’s nothing wrong with gay porn — if you think so, that means you hate gay people, and that makes you a bigot — so there’s nothing wrong with mentioning, whenever we feel like it, that one of Obama’s fundraisers used to make gay porn. It’s a good thing. After all, everybody knows that Obama is:
Exactly.
HARRY REID KILLS PUPPIES FOR FUN!
Let him prove he doesn’t.
It doesn’t matter - they would simply counter that heterosexual predators are targeting our girls, so why is one worse than the other?
Oh right, I think I understand your point. "What difference, at this point, does it make anyway?"
Have you considered that maybe:
No, they would say they’re both wrong, not that one is more wrong than the other.
:^)
No they're not just wrong. People that prey on and molest children are evil, as are those who tolerate evil.
My point about voting democrat was that people that do evil things or tolerate them don't like "judgmental" people who believe in "right or wrong" and aren't very "tolerant" on changing norms. Hence, they vote democrat.
And those are here good points. Who says she doesn't have character?
NAMBLA and libertarianism fit well together.
*WHERE THE BOYS ARE*
A Spy dialogue with Joe Powers, spokesman for the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA)
JP: Well...certainly there is a strong Puritan stream in this country, has been from the beginning, that's always sort of tug-of-war with the more libertarian aspects of the culture
SPY: Are you a Democrat or Republican
JP: Libertarian.
SPY: Who is your favorite politician?
JP: Who do I hate the least, huh?...Barry Goldwater.
actually much of this is a development of revisionist history of the 1950 ivory tower.
In ancient Greece men caught with boys were stoned to death. The professors of the ivory tower intentionally mistranslated “student/teacher” or “mentee/mentor” in order to further their agenda. (ie ignored Alexander the Great’s wife and son. ignored his letter rebuking a Persian governor’s offer of a slave boy as a repugnant insult)
In no society was it EVER open and accepted as normal behavior.
I bet this guy pays off the victim and walks free. Disgusting
Not every “gay” man, just the half of them who fall on the macho side of the spectrum. They go for substitutes for the women they can’t deal with. The simpering fops tend to prefer big muscular “manly” studs.
Sorry, but that’s just historically untrue.
While it is clear that the exact relationship between adult lover and adolescent beloved is not entirely clear, it is also perfectly clear that there was a sexual element involved.
It is celebrated in their art, plays, poetry and other writings. The degree of openness varied over time, but there is little doubt that during the “Golden Age” of Greece the primary sexual and emotional relationships for many upper-class men were homosexual in nature.
During this period, for example, portrayals of boys/young men in art outnumbers women something like 10:1. That’s because they were the ideal of sex and beauty.
Much like the similar disproportion of women vs. men on our magazine covers.
Today, beautiful young women are what sells. Back then it was beautiful young boys.
Oh He does! I have heard that he kicks kittens to death and the things he does with gerbils! UGH!
I don’t need any polls or studies to tell me what I already know. No matter what a homosexual tells me about they’re not being a link between peophelia and homosexuality i know its a lie. History has proven ti e and time again why you din’t leave a homosexual alone with a child. Its in their very nature to molest no matter how much the fight or deny it...
> I think it’s reasonable to note that most of this is not pedophilia, which is attraction to pre-pubescent children. It’s ephebophilia, attraction to pubescent/adolescent males.
Either way you coat it, its inappropriate and damaging to the child \ adolescent \ minor enough that it can cause irreparable damage that remains all of their life. But to a homosexual that doesn’t matter. He just wants to have sex with them for his own self-gratification.
Actually they do believe in right and wrong, just not the same right and wrong we believe in.
For example they believe that it is right for men to “marry” other men and it is wrong for us to keep them from doing so.
So in their own eyes they’re being very moral.
The culture war that we’re in is all about values, and which ones are going to dominate our society. So far they’ve had incredibly good success because they’ve been much more aggressive in promoting and institutionalizing theirs than we have been in defending ours.
The question we have to ask ourselves is why have they been more successful and what are we going to do about it.
The question we have to ask ourselves is why have they been more successful and what are we going to do about it.
Maybe they've been more successful because there payoff for success is the immediate gratification of more sex, money & power for those that buy in to the hedonistic lifestyle.
On a related note, from the other day discussing homosexual recruitment of adolescent boys by gay black males in the black community and the "down low" story:
A Happy Conservative Black Woman on the Gay Agenda and Black America (Rush Limbaugh show, 4/20)
Do remember that time at Man's Country when what's his name showed up and (censored)
How can I forget?
My favorite was when you came to visit me in SF in '97. Man, now that was a good time.
“Maybe they’ve been more successful because there payoff for success is the immediate gratification of more sex, money & power for those that buy in to the hedonistic lifestyle.”
Didn’t they already have that?
The reason they’re more successful is because they’re much more willing to actively fight for what they want than we are for what we want. They’re activists, we’re passivists.
Or to put it another way, their level of discomfort with the status quo, with traditional morals, is such that it impels them to rise up and protest in the streets, stage sit ins in CEO’s and politicians offices, break windows and set fire on things if necessary to scare enough powerful people to “see” things their ways. We haven’t reached that level of discomfort.
Actually we did... temporarily - when the tea party first rose up. We did take to the streets, caused discomfort for the politicians and bureaucrats, and guess what, IT WORKED. But then we quit doing it while the other side kept at it.
Lesson learned? This war is not won by winning one battle. The struggle is constant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.