To: markomalley
Good Morning FReepers. I just LOVE this guy :) :) I don’t want a primary challenge or runoff. I want TED CRUZ!! This is the BEST retort I have seen in years to a liberal argument. And I don’t even own a gun lol. I HATE that about New York CityUSSR
2 posted on
04/21/2015 4:34:09 AM PDT by
dp0622
To: markomalley
But the Times doesn’t care about those “old guys.” Most of the staff probably doesn’t even know who those guys were.
And who cares about the Constitution? It’s so yesterday.
To: markomalley
Never take a NY Times writer to a Cruz fight.
When they punch you, punch back twice as hard. Even a NYT reporter will figure it out after a while.
4 posted on
04/21/2015 4:37:01 AM PDT by
St_Thomas_Aquinas
( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
To: markomalley
The NYT is perverse. Stalin’s best friend, historically an abetter in genocide.
6 posted on
04/21/2015 4:38:43 AM PDT by
The_Media_never_lie
(The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
To: markomalley; dp0622
Well well, Cruz can lay on the rhetoric to the Leftists. Nice to see he can slug it out in the media.
Now let’s hear about his policy positions.
15 posted on
04/21/2015 4:50:03 AM PDT by
Old Sarge
(Its the Sixties all over again, but with crappy music...)
To: markomalley
I find the views of NYTimes extremely “STRANGE”...
Only the NYTimes,communists,fascists,marxist,leninist and islamists here and around the world would disagree, it is very strange to them that mere human beings should have the right to defend themselves against tyrannical government.
17 posted on
04/21/2015 4:53:57 AM PDT by
PoloSec
( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
To: markomalley
This is what passes for liberal "logic" today. A candidate, Cruz, states per the constitution that citizens have the right to be armed against a possible tyrannical government, and that makes the candidate crazy. It's not just the Slimes. It's virtually every lib rag or scribbler who laughs at the constitution.
They simply can't imagine a circumstance where the average citizen might need a firearm to protect him or herself and their family against some kind of danger. I don't think even the libs of fifty years ago were quite as crazy as the people at the Slimes and other lib rags.
To: markomalley
The only refuge left for those who prophesy the downfall of the State governments is the visionary supposition that the federal government may previously accumulate a military force for the projects of ambition. The reasonings contained in these papers must have been employed to little purpose indeed, if it could be necessary now to disprove the reality of this danger. That the people and the States should, for a sufficient period of time, elect an uninterrupted succession of men ready to betray both; that the traitors should, throughout this period, uniformly and systematically pursue some fixed plan for the extension of the military establishment; that the governments and the people of the States should silently and patiently behold the gathering storm, and continue to supply the materials, until it should be prepared to burst on their own heads, must appear to every one more like the incoherent dreams of a delirious jealousy, or the misjudged exaggerations of a counterfeit zeal, than like the sober apprehensions of genuine patriotism. I had to read this carefully three times before I could begin to understand it.
27 posted on
04/21/2015 5:14:50 AM PDT by
Blennos
To: markomalley
Read the Madison quote carefully.
Particularly where he talks about the people and the States electing a string of leaders inclined to tyranny.
He’s talking specifically about how the States elect Senators. Or at least did, before the 17th Amendment. IOW if you want to find the thing that has, more than anything else, enabled the spread of tyranny, thats the place to look.
To: markomalley
To totalitarian fodder....individual rights are strange.
29 posted on
04/21/2015 5:33:29 AM PDT by
WKUHilltopper
(And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
To: markomalley
33 posted on
04/21/2015 6:01:14 AM PDT by
Rummyfan
(Let us now try liberty)
To: markomalley; Kale; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; RitaOK; MountainDad; ...
Ted Cruz Ping!
If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
CRUZ or LOSE!
40 posted on
04/21/2015 7:26:10 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: markomalley
The more propaganda they trow out there and trash Ted Cruz the more people will stop and take notice of the liberals “ ginnned up trumped up “ “ controversy “ and listen to what Ted Cruz actually has to say.
There will be a tipping point, but it won’t be in the liberals or NYTs favore.
To: markomalley
The NY Times is an “official $hit slinger” of the LIBERAL LEFT.. period.. the end.
To: markomalley
How to extract a festering infected stinky boil ( media, liberals, commies ) with the use of tea ( tea party , truth ).
You take some tea bags and boil them, let them cool a bit, then place the tea bags on the boil for a hour or two and the tea bags will bring the infected boil to a head and extract the infection...
A home remedy... Works like Witch Hazel.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson