Posted on 04/18/2015 2:20:27 PM PDT by Ken H
Former Pittsburgh school police officer Robert Lellock has been arrested and charged with raping 22 male students he was hired to protect. A federal lawsuit notes that school officials should have known about the abuse, as Lellock was frequently taking boys out of the classroom to rape them in a janitor’s closet.
According to the Tribune-Review, Robert Lellock worked for the Pittsburgh public school system as a school police officer where he repeatedly sexually abused at least 22 boys. One victim claims that Lellock removed him from class at least two dozen times to rape him in a janitor’s closet. The victim, who has not been named out of privacy, is now 29-years-old and says that he was raped as a student at the school from 1998-1999.
The lawsuit claims that at least two school officials should have noticed that Lellock was repeatedly taking boys out of the classroom. The lawsuit notes that the school police officer did not have permission to remove students from class; therefore, teachers and administrators should have investigated why the man was frequently seen removing male students from the classroom.
“Not a single teacher reported him, or even questioned him. Not a single teacher made an inquiry to the office,” the lawsuit says.
(Excerpt) Read more at inquisitr.com ...
Your evidence that none of these kids reported what happened at the time is what again?
Defend your assertion.
If it wasn’t made up out of thin air.
I get it.
I think we’re on the same page.
Too much blue worship
In this case the sacred stalking horse was not football but the weird blue line.
22 boys and not one of them knifed the bastard. Scary.
Is it possible he gaydared them out as being unusually susceptible victims?
More than likely.
Cops are criminals.
...................
You really think so? All of them?
That’s how “gays” reproduce.
Absolute nonsense. Every single, solitary "gay" person is the offspring of a man and a woman.
But they are not born gay. They become that way by trauma.
This is true, but you are both using a different meaning for the word "Reproduce." BenLurkin didn't mean it in the biological sense, but in the predisposition sense.
Something just goes terribly wrong in the minds of these people.
I remember the old Anita Bryant slogan: Gays can’t reproduce, so they must recruit. It has been repeated here on FR countless times over the years.
What was stupid about that slogan was the linking of reproduction with seduction. It asserted that the IMPULSE TO SEDUCE arose from the same urge that mothers and fathers have to have children.
It also implied that “gays” are a distinct species. It obscured the fact that, behind every “gay” person is a set of parents who are themselves defective—usually narcissists. It displaced all responsibility for the existence of “gays” from their parents to their seducers.
My point is that seduction of young people by homosexual adults has absolutely nothing to do with an urge to “reproduce.” The slogan is stupid, and makes no point worth making.
Hundreds watched a girl on the beach being gang raped too. Guess our liberal 'no rules' society is turning out to be a horror...
Sadly, we really are pretty far down that rabbit hole.
___________________________________________________________________
Years later, while at New Castle Youth Development Center, the witness said he again told a counselor, who contacted state police. A trooper went to the youth's home to take his statement, but nothing came of it, he said.
Neither the state police nor Gateway responded to requests for comment.
Investigators in Lellock's case said state police purged records and troopers did not remember the victim.
http://triblive.com/news/allegheny/4478122-74/lellock-abuse-victim
What is your basis for saying he never reported it? See post #77.
You can't do that. Second hand smoke will kill him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.