This is true, but you are both using a different meaning for the word "Reproduce." BenLurkin didn't mean it in the biological sense, but in the predisposition sense.
Something just goes terribly wrong in the minds of these people.
I remember the old Anita Bryant slogan: Gays can’t reproduce, so they must recruit. It has been repeated here on FR countless times over the years.
What was stupid about that slogan was the linking of reproduction with seduction. It asserted that the IMPULSE TO SEDUCE arose from the same urge that mothers and fathers have to have children.
It also implied that “gays” are a distinct species. It obscured the fact that, behind every “gay” person is a set of parents who are themselves defective—usually narcissists. It displaced all responsibility for the existence of “gays” from their parents to their seducers.
My point is that seduction of young people by homosexual adults has absolutely nothing to do with an urge to “reproduce.” The slogan is stupid, and makes no point worth making.