Skip to comments.
American flag case: U.S. Supreme Court ends Morgan Hill flap over shirts
San Jose Mercury ^
| 03/30/2015
| Howard Mintz
Posted on 03/30/2015 2:46:30 PM PDT by artichokegrower
Turning away a legal plea literally wrapped in the American flag, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to intervene in a controversial case involving a South Bay high school's discipline of students who chose to wear flag-adorned shirts during a 2010 Cinco de Mayo celebration.
The high court's action left intact a federal appeals court ruling last year that found Live Oak High School officials had the legal right to order students wearing the American flag shirts to turn them inside out or go home.
(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: americanflag; california; flag; flags; morganhill; scotus; shirts; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Goodbye sweet America
To: artichokegrower
Who the HELL makes these decisions in this Court?
2
posted on
03/30/2015 2:50:30 PM PDT
by
fwdude
(The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
To: fwdude
3
posted on
03/30/2015 2:52:41 PM PDT
by
mrmeyer
(You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. – Robert Heinlein)
To: artichokegrower
I sugest they wear the French Flag instead.
4
posted on
03/30/2015 2:54:32 PM PDT
by
alpacadick
(alpacadick)
To: artichokegrower
This is actually a mixed decision:
1. Good - The court refused to intervene in a local matter, and let the local school board's decision stand.
2. Bad - The court allowed the free speech of some students to be curtailed by a presumed threat of retaliation by another group.
I think this was a tough call. I think most conservatives would agree that public schools have a right to impose dress codes prohibiting lewd or offensive material, but the problem in this case is that the supposedly "offensive" material is the American flag. So I'm torn by this decision.
To: Steve_Seattle
“2. Bad - The court allowed the free speech of some students to be curtailed by a presumed threat of retaliation by another group.”
There is already Supreme Court precedent (Tinker vs. Des Moines Independent School District, 1969) that says public schools can stifle students’ speech, if it is disruptive or causes disorder.
6
posted on
03/30/2015 3:02:46 PM PDT
by
Boogieman
To: Boogieman
"There is already Supreme Court precedent (Tinker vs. Des Moines Independent School District, 1969) that says public schools can stifle students speech, if it is disruptive or causes disorder."
The problem or ambiguity is, who is threatening the disorder? Is the onus on the kids wearing the American flag t-shirts, or on the kids who might be offended? Are the flag-wearers provoking disorder, or are the others threatening disorder to prevent free expression on the other side? And if we say that merely wearing the image of the American flag is a dangerous provocation, what are we saying about our country?
To: Boogieman
There are some options.
1. Home school being the best option
2. in Texas the Lt. Governor Dan Patric is backing SB 276
This bill will allow parents to take 60% of the child’s allotted money to ANY school, public, private and possibly home school. The remainder would go back to the state treasury.
This is a means to regain local control of the Education dictatorship.
8
posted on
03/30/2015 3:08:25 PM PDT
by
DanZ
To: artichokegrower
Closer than ever to the time we will need a new America; one that reinforces and reemphasizes the Founders’ Principles of Freedom, Self-Reliance, Small Government, and Constitutional Limits.
9
posted on
03/30/2015 3:11:54 PM PDT
by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2017; I pray we make it that long.)
To: Steve_Seattle
“On the kids who might be offended”
No one is offended. Anyone who says they are is lying.
It’s just simple mau-mauing the flak catchers. It’s amazing that it still works.
10
posted on
03/30/2015 3:15:48 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise. .)
To: Boogieman
(Tinker vs. Des Moines Independent School District, 1969) that says public schools can stifle students speech, if it is disruptive or causes disorder.
So I can go up to UC Berkeley (a public school) and stifle the ongoing student protests (usually about hating America) because they are disruptive and causing disorder?
To: Steve_Seattle; Boogieman
"Are the flag-wearers provoking disorder, or are the others threatening disorder to prevent free expression on the other side?"IIRC, this is exactly what is happening...the mexicans confronted the other kids over the shirts.
It's funny in a sad way that many other "holidays" are no longer celebrated in the USA, but a completely un-American, made up, irrelevant "holiday" trumps freedom of expression...a sad commentary to be sure.
12
posted on
03/30/2015 3:21:05 PM PDT
by
SZonian
(Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
To: artichokegrower
The parents should surround the school or march around the school on May 5th carrying American flags, and wearing American flag tee shirts, and making sure their child is wearing one, even if they all get tossed out. Then we’ll leave it to the court of public opinion.
13
posted on
03/30/2015 3:27:25 PM PDT
by
Ge0ffrey
To: artichokegrower
The answer is for EVERY AMerican Student to begin complaining EVERY DAY about Mexicans and Their Che,Castro, DogTaco shirts, as well as speaking in a foreign language.
14
posted on
03/30/2015 3:27:47 PM PDT
by
eyeamok
To: artichokegrower
OK,....the legal right to order students wearing the American flag shirts to turn them inside out or go home. So the Kid wears a USMC T-Shurt.<[>
15
posted on
03/30/2015 3:27:48 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: Steve_Seattle
I agree with you. However, I don't see this as a free speech issue. Most schools have a dress code and as long as they are consistent with the policy then I have no problem with enforcing not wearing a Flag shirt on certain days.
However, as a parent I would object to a school having a “Cinco de Mayo Celebration”. It is a minor holiday in Mexico but in the US it has mostly been turned into a drunk fest like St. Patrick's day. I think U.S. schools should stick to teaching and not celebrating Mexican holidays....
Also I am old school and do not think a flag should be worn as an article of clothing.
As someone posted, the best solution is home school.
To: artichokegrower
But the mexican flag is just fine.
17
posted on
03/30/2015 3:30:48 PM PDT
by
aquila48
(JennysCool)
To: Boogieman
Seems like the “ free speech “ they should stifle are the threats made by the mexicans.
18
posted on
03/30/2015 3:33:10 PM PDT
by
aquila48
(JennysCool)
To: Ge0ffrey
Actually there’s been such a protest every year since it first happened. I attended last year’s.
19
posted on
03/30/2015 3:36:04 PM PDT
by
aquila48
(JennysCool)
To: artichokegrower
Interestingly, the flip of this suit hasn't happened, prohibiting the district from permitting any further Cinco de Mayo celebrations, since they are obviously disruptive to the school, as evidenced by the school policing t-shirts on the 5th of May to ensure that no one is wearing an American flag...
20
posted on
03/30/2015 3:42:04 PM PDT
by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson