Posted on 03/21/2015 9:56:10 PM PDT by jonatron
Nearly 400 British girls as young as eleven are believed to have been sexually exploited by Muslim rape gangs in Oxfordshire over the past 15 years, according to a chilling new report. It charges local officials with repeatedly ignoring the abuse due to a "culture of denial."
The scale of the abuse in Oxfordshire, a county in southeast England, mirrors similarly shocking accounts of the sexual exploitation of white British girls by Muslim gangs in Bristol, Derby, Rochdale, Rotherham and Telford, and implies that the problem is not isolated, but endemic.
"Between acts of abuse sometimes stretching over a number of days, the Oxford men ensured girls were guarded so that they could not escape. In addition to being abused in various locations in Oxford, some of the girls were taken to other towns and cities such as London and Bournemouth for the same purpose."
(Excerpt) Read more at gatestoneinstitute.org ...
Good point.
You can't do anything.
The People have,No Guns,No Rights,and are Second class citizens in the face of these bast*rds' sympathisers in government.
Whatever happens, it is always the Honky's Fault, regardless of the incident.
No-one can afford to do a stretch in the slammer for 'Upsetting' one of these Stone-age Pigs.
It is going to get really bad before the Army are called in to clean shop...but who will they be ordered to clean?
*Deep Breath* :)
London was full of turbans 40 years ago when I was there. I can’t imagine what it’s like now.
Why blame these Arab immigrants? They are simply emulating the prophet Mohammed who deflowered a nine year old “wife” who could not speak afterwards, lost her voice, and whose hair fell out?
( Heavy Sarc.)
Now let us see how it is practiced on a female child and who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was six years old until she reached nine years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith, which was quoted earlier, mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of nine (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89). Therefore, Muslim scholars collectively agree, by virtue of divine example, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.
According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size and age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her. Imagine a man of fifty-one removing the clothes of a six-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs? Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of nine. Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.“Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, the question forwarded to the committee by the grand scholar of the committee with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar). The inquirer asked the following:‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha - the mother of believers - may Allah be pleased with her?’After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age. That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers’” (Fatwa No. 31409).Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. These countries are notoriously known for this evil practice. There are many more such evil practices like altamatu’a bil almufakhaza (pleasure from sexual contact with her thighs), altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir). These are all different styles practiced on the female child by placing the male erected penis in different parts of the child’s body for getting sexual pleasure...
What can one say but ‘as it was in the beginning, so it always shall be’ - in a culture in which the women and female children are nothing but chattel, with less value than a camel or a goat.
Once upon a time I hoped they would remain in the desert, but more and more as time passes, I can see they want to inflict their culture and it’s cult of muhammad upon us.
By the sword.
We either prevent that, or we are lost.
Rape used to be punishable by 20 years and an annual lashing.
By the sword indeed.
We must fight them and win on these kinds of issues.
And just when you thought it couldn’t get any sicker:
Say goodbye to your culture and Land You Limey fools...
watch the youtube video of Dr Bill Warner
“why are we afraid”
Islam 1400 years spread by murder
A bit overwhelmed on this thread, aren’t you, old chap?
Cheerio, from us overfreedomed and overarmed Yanks!
;^)
Muslims don’t wear turbans. Sikhs wear turbans.
p.s England/the UK isn’t London, anymore than NY or LA are the US.
‘The People have,No Guns,No Rights,’
Wrong and wrong again.
You type that with one hand?.
Always have to get the last word in, eh, old chum?
Anyway, glad you’re back.
;^)
LOL
Hugs and kisses.
See you at the East London mega mosque.
;^)
The secularists just knew that dispensing with that icky Christianity business would bring about the golden tomorrow of rationalism. Or as Paul Johnson put it:
“When you expel the priest, you do not inaugurate the age of reason—you get the witch doctor.” That is, jungle, tribal nationalism.
It took five years to get the noise from the minarets silenced for the early morning ,and dammed antisocial, call to “prayer” after they had had the Church bells silenced completely in ‘their” area of the City. That looks like infringement of rights to me.
There are no other “ethnic” groups in this town that cause problems to the same magnitude as these creatures. We have a full spectrum of the world here, guess who stands out on the crime and offensive behaviour spectrum? Even the Indians curl up at the edges at their behaviour.
Staying calm and carrying on is ,as you know, the British way of dealing with problems. This is a sign of defeat and surrender to them. They think they are winning. In many towns and Cities ,they are!
I actually forgot you are British, lol.
To say we don’t have guns is nonsense, esp from an actual Briton. We have 2.3m legal guns in the UK. Yes, the gun laws have been bad and kneejerk, and I hope to god are repealed one day. But barring assault rifles (which almost nobody owned in 1988) and mainland handguns, the vast majority of UK guns have always been rifles and shotguns, so most thankfully weren’t banned.
CC?. Legal in NI, allowed very sparingly on mainland.
Rights?. Yes, like you, I am sick of the PC offense culture that clamps down on you and I yet is scared to attack them (although imo that is changing), but again to overstate by saying we have no rights is silly. We have them, we just need a cultural change to assert them.
Religion of Peace alert...
Dumb-Ass UK/Liberal Alert...
I spit in the face of Islam... It truly is the Whore of Babylon. They will be the reason for the Last War.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.